Megastudies : What do millions ( or so ) of trials tell us about lexical processing ?

[1]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Practice Effects in Large-Scale Visual Word Recognition Studies: A Lexical Decision Study on 14,000 Dutch Mono- and Disyllabic Words and Nonwords , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[2]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Accessing Different Types of Lexical Semantic Information: Evidence From Priming , 1995 .

[3]  David A. Balota,et al.  Bringing Computational Models of Word Naming Down to the Item Level , 1997 .

[4]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  M. Posner,et al.  Positron Emission Tomographic Studies of the Processing of Singe Words , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Smart Phone, Smart Science: How the Use of Smartphones Can Revolutionize Research in Cognitive Science , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[8]  David A. Balota,et al.  The semantic priming project , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[9]  Lloyd G. Humphreys,et al.  Research on individual differences requires correlational analysis, not ANOVA , 1978 .

[10]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving Beyond the Mean in Studies of Mental Chronometry , 2011 .

[11]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. , 1993 .

[13]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  T. McNamara.  Semantic Priming: Perspectives from Memory and Word Recognition , 2005 .

[15]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  P. T. Fox,et al.  Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing , 1988, Nature.

[18]  Zachary Estes,et al.  The unexplained nature of reading. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[20]  W S Murray,et al.  Serial mechanisms in lexical access: the rank hypothesis. , 2004, Psychological review.

[21]  Daragh E. Sibley,et al.  Error, error everywhere: A look at megastudies of word reading , 2009 .

[22]  D. Balota,et al.  Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words , 2009 .

[23]  M. Glanzer,et al.  The regularities of recognition memory. , 1993, Psychological review.

[24]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[25]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[26]  R. Baayen,et al.  Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words , 2006 .

[27]  H. H. Clark.  The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[28]  Daragh E. Sibley,et al.  Individual Differences in Visual Word Recognition: Insights from the English Lexicon Project , 2012 .

[29]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Contextual Diversity, Not Word Frequency, Determines Word-Naming and Lexical Decision Times , 2006, Psychological science.

[30]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and in priming in lexical decision and naming , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[33]  D. Jared.  Spelling-Sound Consistency and Regularity Effects in Word Naming , 2002 .

[34]  D. Balota,et al.  Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[37]  Curt Burgess,et al.  The effect of corpus size in predicting reaction time in a basic word recognition task: Moving on from Kučera and Francis , 1998 .

[38]  K. Hutchison.  The effect of asymmetrical association on positive and negative semantic priming , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Recognition memory for 2,578 monosyllabic words , 2010, Memory.

[40]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Tangible Words are Recognized Faster: The Grounding of Meaning in Sensory and Perceptual Systems , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[41]  D. Balota,et al.  The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? ☆ , 1985 .

[42]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[43]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. , 2004, Psychological review.

[44]  D. Balota,et al.  Age-related differences in lexical access, spreading activation, and simple pronunciation. , 1988, Psychology and aging.

[45]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  Siti Syuhada Binte Faizal,et al.  The Malay Lexicon Project: A database of lexical statistics for 9,592 words , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[47]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[49]  S. Goldinger.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[50]  L. Katz,et al.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison. , 1987 .

[51]  W. Kintsch,et al.  High-dimensional semantic space accounts of priming q , 2006 .

[52]  G. Leech,et al.  Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: based on the British National Corpus , 2001 .

[53]  Boris New,et al.  SEMANTIC AND ASSOCIATIVE PRIMING IN THE MENTAL LEXICON , 2003 .

[54]  Marc Brys,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009 .

[55]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Predicting semantic priming at the item level , 2008 .

[56]  S. Monsell,et al.  Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound : Strategic anticipation of lexical status , 1992 .

[57]  D C Rubin,et al.  Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[58]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  The activation of semantic memory: Effects of prime exposure, prime-target relationship, and task demands , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[59]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  How semantic is automatic semantic priming , 1992 .

[60]  J. Grainger,et al.  Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: a megastudy. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[62]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[63]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[64]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. , 1987 .

[65]  Dan Chateau,et al.  Spelling–sound consistency effects in disyllabic word naming , 2003 .

[66]  Curt Burgess,et al.  From simple associations to the building blocks of language: Modeling meaning in memory with the HAL model , 1998 .

[67]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Item performance in visual word recognition , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[68]  A. Cutler.  Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? , 1981, Cognition.

[69]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[70]  Gordon D A Brown,et al.  Modeling lexical decision: the form of frequency and diversity effects. , 2008, Psychological review.

[71]  K I Forster,et al.  The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[72]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Familiarity breeds differentiation: a subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. , 1998, Psychological review.

[73]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[74]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Effects of association and imageability on phonological mapping , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[75]  Mark S. Seidenberg.  The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.

[76]  John N. Williams.  Is Automatic Priming Semantic , 1996 .

[77]  S. Lupker,et al.  Strategic Control in a Naming Task: Changing Routes or Changing Deadlines? , 1997 .

[78]  M. Taft.  The body of the BOSS : subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words , 1992 .

[79]  K. McRae,et al.  Automatic semantic similarity priming. , 1998 .

[80]  Gordon D A Brown,et al.  Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies , 2007, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[81]  S. Pinker.  Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language , 1999 .

[82]  Jacob Cohen.  The Cost of Dichotomization , 1983 .

[83]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  The rank hypothesis and lexical decision: a reply to Adelman and Brown (2008). , 2008, Psychological review.

[84]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[85]  Christopher A. Kurby,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Semantic Size Does Not Matter: " Bigger " Words Are Not Recognized Faster , 2022 .

[86]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[87]  Dennis Norris,et al.  The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.

[88]  K. Paap,et al.  Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race , 1991 .