Finger synergies during multi-finger cyclic production of moment of force

We investigated multi-finger synergies stabilizing the total moment of force and the total force when the subjects produced a quick cyclic change in the total moment of force. The seated subjects performed the task with the fingers of the dominant arm while paced by the metronome at 1.33 Hz. They were required to produce a rhythmic, sine-like change in the total pronation–supination moment of force computed with respect to the midpoint between the middle and ring fingers. The framework of the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis was used to compute indices of stabilization of the total moment and of the total force across 20 cycles. Variance of the total moment showed a cyclic pattern with peaks close to the peak rate of the moment change. Variance of the total force was maximal close to peak moment into supination. Higher magnitudes of the moment directed against the required moment direction (antagonist moment) were produced by individual fingers during supination efforts as compared to pronation efforts. Indices of multi-finger synergies showed across-trials stabilization of the total moment over the whole cycle but not of the total force. These indices were smaller during supination efforts. We conclude that the central nervous system facilitates multi-finger synergies stabilizing the total rotational action across a variety of tasks. Synergies stabilizing the total force are not seen in tasks that do not explicitly require accurate force control. Pronation efforts are performed more efficiently and with better stabilization of the action.

[1]  Michel Loève,et al.  Probability Theory I , 1977 .

[2]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Hand function and the neocortex , 1985 .

[3]  M. Arbib.  Coordinated control programs for movements of the hand , 1985 .

[4]  W. Rymer,et al.  Strategies for muscle activation during isometric torque generation at the human elbow. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  K. Newell.  Motor skill acquisition. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  S W O'Driscoll,et al.  Functional comparison of pronation and supination strengths. , 1993, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[7]  J. Zuckerman,et al.  Effects of age, testing speed, and arm dominance on isokinetic strength of the elbow. , 1997, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[8]  M L Latash,et al.  On the problem of adequate language in motor control. , 1998, Motor control.

[9]  M. Latash,et al.  Force sharing among fingers as a model of the redundancy problem , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  R. Johansson,et al.  Control of grasp stability during pronation and supination movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  R. Johansson,et al.  Control of grasp stability in humans under different frictional conditions during multidigit manipulation. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Suguru Arimoto,et al.  Dynamics and control of a set of dual fingers with soft tips , 2000, Robotica.

[14]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Force synergies for multifingered grasping , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  M. Latash,et al.  Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  B I Prilutsky,et al.  Coordination of two- and one-joint muscles: functional consequences and implications for motor control. , 2000, Motor control.

[17]  Suguru Arimoto,et al.  Principle of Superposition for Controlling Pinch Motions by Means of Robot Fingers with Soft Tips , 2000 .

[18]  Suguru Arimoto,et al.  Principles of superposition for controlling pinch motions by means of robot fingers with soft tips , 2001, Robotica.

[19]  M. Latash,et al.  Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Understanding finger coordination through analysis of the structure of force variability , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  M. Latash,et al.  Motor Control Strategies Revealed in the Structure of Motor Variability , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[22]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Force and torque production in static multifinger prehension: biomechanics and control. I. Biomechanics , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  M. Latash,et al.  Prehension synergies: Effects of object geometry and prescribed torques , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  M. Latash,et al.  Finger coordination during discrete and oscillatory force production tasks , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  M. Latash,et al.  Finger coordination in persons with Down syndrome: atypical patterns of coordination and the effects of practice , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  A mode hypothesis for finger interaction during multi-finger force-production tasks , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  M. Latash,et al.  Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and hierarchical organization of stable performance , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  M. Latash,et al.  Uncontrolled manifold analysis of single trials during multi-finger force production by persons with and without Down syndrome , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  M. Latash,et al.  Prehension Synergies , 2004, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[30]  Fan Gao,et al.  The principle of superposition in human prehension , 2004, Robotica.

[31]  J. Flanagan,et al.  The stability of precision grip forces during cyclic arm movements with a hand-held load , 1990, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  M. Latash,et al.  Motor variability within a multi-effector system: experimental and analytical studies of multi-finger production of quick force pulses , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Marc H Schieber,et al.  Human finger independence: limitations due to passive mechanical coupling versus active neuromuscular control. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Finger coordination during moment production on a mechanically fixed object , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  R. S. Johansson,et al.  Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  M. Latash,et al.  Age-related changes in finger coordination in static prehension tasks. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[37]  Halla B. Olafsdottir,et al.  Is the thumb a fifth finger? A study of digit interaction during force production tasks , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Jae Kun Shim,et al.  Rotational equilibrium during multi-digit pressing and prehension. , 2004, Motor control.

[39]  Joachim Hermsdörfer,et al.  Grip force behavior during object manipulation in neurological disorders: Toward an objective evaluation of manual performance deficits , 2005, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[40]  M. Latash,et al.  Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and principle of superposition during static prehension in three dimensions. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Keith Davids,et al.  Movement system variability , 2005 .

[42]  K. An,et al.  An analysis of symmetry of torque strength of the forearm under resisted forearm rotation in normal subjects. , 2006, The Journal of hand surgery.

[43]  M. Latash,et al.  Accurate production of time-varying patterns of the moment of force in multi-finger tasks , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.