Critical incident-based computer supported collaborative learning

Practitioners are regularly confronted with significant events which present them with learning opportunities, and yet many are unable to recognise the learning opportunity these significant events present. The ability to recognise a learning opportunity in the workplace and learn from it, is a higher-order cognitive skill which instructors should be seeking to develop in learners. The study reported in this paper developed, implemented and evaluated the efficacy of a model of teaching and learning which embodied the essence of this focus, which is entitled “Critical Incident-Based Computer Supported Collaborative Learning” (CI-CSCL) and it is driven by the premise that much greater benefit can be derived from the experiences of practitioners in authentic environments by enabling them to share their individual learning experiences among the student cohort. The study was carried out within a course in the Post-Registration Nursing (RN) degree program at the University of Southern Queensland in AUSTRALIA.Data reported in this paper was drawn from two sources; (a) students' reflections on critical incidents; and (b) a semi-structured evaluation. The reflections were examined for attributes we were attempting to engender in learners with our model of learning. The semi-structured evaluation sought open-ended responses. The analyses of data collected showed evidence of participants: seeking and offering comments; reflecting on critical incidents; describing what happened and assessing their own actions; making the connection between theory and practice; identifying and defining problems; and adopting a more structured and systematic approach to problem solving.

[1]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[2]  V. Thomas,et al.  Patient-controlled analgesia: a new method for old. , 1993, Journal of advanced nursing.

[3]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Interactive Learning Environments: A New Look at Assessment and Instruction , 1992 .

[4]  R. Mason,et al.  Mindweave : communication, computers and distance education , 1989 .

[5]  Meredith D. Gall Tools for Learning: A Guide to Teaching Study Skills , 1990 .

[6]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[7]  Improvement,et al.  Encouraging Reflective Practice in Education: An Analysis of Issues and Programs , 1990 .

[8]  Beau Jones,et al.  Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction , 1990 .

[9]  Howard S. Barrows,et al.  Practice Based Learning: Problem Based Learning Applied to Medical Education , 1994 .

[10]  J. Dewey How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[12]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[13]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[14]  Robert M. Smith How People Become Effective Learners , 1991 .

[15]  P. Goodyear,et al.  Flexible learning in higher education: the use of computer-mediated communications , 1994 .

[16]  S. Sharan Cooperative Learning in Small Groups: Recent Methods and Effects on Achievement, Attitudes, and Ethnic Relations , 1980 .

[17]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Paradigm shifts and instructional technology : An introduction , 1996 .

[18]  D. Schoen The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[19]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[20]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective , 1996 .