Send Orders of Reprints at Reprints@benthamscience.net Comparison of Extreme Offshore Structural Response from Two Alterna- Tive Stretching Techniques

Linear random wave theory (LRWT) has successfully explained most properties of real sea waves with the ex- ception of some nonlinear effects for surface elevation and water particle kinematics. Due to its simplicity, it is frequently used to simulate water particle kinematics at different nodes of an offshore structure from a reference surface elevation record; however, predicted water particle kinematics from LRWT suffer from unrealistically large high-frequency compo- nents in the vicinity of mean water level (MWL). To overcome this deficiency, a common industry practice for evaluation of wave kinematics in the free surface zone consists of using linear random wave theory in conjunction with empirical techniques (such as Wheeler and vertical stretching methods) to provide a more realistic representation of near-surface wave kinematics. It is well known that the predicted kinematics from these methods are different; however, no systematic study has been conducted to investigate the effect of this on the magnitude of extreme responses of an offshore structure. In this paper, probability distributions of extreme responses of an offshore structure from Wheeler and vertical stretching methods are compared. It is shown that the difference is significant; consequently, further research is required to deter- mine which method is more reliable.

[1]  J. D. Wheeler,et al.  METHOD FOR CALCULATING FORCES PRODUCED BY IRREGULAR WAVES , 1970 .

[2]  G. Lindgren,et al.  Some Properties of a Normal Process Near a Local Maximum , 1970 .

[3]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Comparison of experimental irregular water wave elevation and kinematic data with new hybrid wave model predictions , 1996 .

[4]  G. Najafian.  Probability models for offshore structural response due to Morison wave loading: Part II: Inertia-only and total responses , 2007 .

[5]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Field Verification of Linear and Nonlinear Hybrid Wave Models for Offshore Tower Response Prediction , 1997 .

[6]  G. Z. Forristall,et al.  An Empirical Model For Random Directional Wave Kinematics Near The Free Surface , 1986 .

[7]  G. Najafian,et al.  Probability models for offshore structural response due to Morison wave loading Part I: Drag-only response , 2007 .

[8]  Geir Moe,et al.  HYDRODYNAMIC DAMPING OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES IN WAVES AND CURRENTS , 1980 .

[9]  W. Pierson,et al.  A proposed spectral form for fully developed wind seas based on the similarity theory of S , 1964 .

[10]  L. Borgman,et al.  Ocean wave simulation for engineering design , 1967 .

[11]  T. Sarpkaya,et al.  Mechanics of wave forces on offshore structures , 1981 .

[12]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Hybrid wave model for unidirectional irregular waves—part II. Comparison with laboratory measurements , 1996 .

[13]  Mark A. Donelan,et al.  A simple method for calculating the velocity field beneath irregular waves , 1992 .

[14]  George Z. Forristall,et al.  Irregular wave kinematics from a kinematic boundary condition fit (KBCF) , 1985 .

[15]  J. R. Morison,et al.  The Force Exerted by Surface Waves on Piles , 1950 .

[16]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Hybrid wave model for unidirectional irregular waves—part I. Theory and numerical scheme , 1996 .