Cerebral gliomas: diffusional kurtosis imaging analysis of microstructural differences.

PURPOSE To characterize the non-Gaussian diffusion patterns of cerebral glioma microstructure with respect to the different glioma grades by using a new method called diffusional kurtosis (DK) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this study with institutional review board approval and patient consent, diffusional measures of mean kurtosis (MK), fractional anisotropy (FA), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were compared prospectively. Data were normalized to the contralateral white matter. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare each histologic glioma subtype regarding the diffusion measurements. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to test for the parameter with the best sensitivity and specificity for glioma grade discrimination. RESULTS In 34 patients with cerebral gliomas (five World Health Organization [WHO] grade II astrocytomas, 13 WHO grade III astrocytomas, and 16 WHO grade IV glioblastomas multiforme), significantly different diffusion patterns were found among the three glioma groups. MK values increased with higher glioma malignancy, whereas ADCs tended to decrease with higher malignancy; FA values did not differ significantly among tumor groups. Significant differences between astrocytoma grades WHO II and WHO III were demonstrated only by DK values. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was highest for normalized MK (0.972) during testing to discriminate between low- and high-grade gliomas. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates specific diffusion patterns for low- and high-grade gliomas, showing that DK imaging is able to depict microstructural changes within glioma tissue and is able to help differentiate among glioma grades. (c) RSNA, 2010.

[1]  J K Smith,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of high-grade cerebral gliomas. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  C. Beaulieu,et al.  The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system – a technical review , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[3]  Mark E Bastin,et al.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging of high-grade cerebral gliomas. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  G. L. Bretthorst,et al.  Statistical model for diffusion attenuated MR signal , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  V. Wedeen,et al.  Reduction of eddy‐current‐induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice‐refocused spin echo , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of intracranial neoplasia and associated peritumoral edema: introduction of the tumor infiltration index. , 2004, Radiology.

[7]  N. Hopf,et al.  Contribution of diffusion tensor imaging to delineation of gliomas and glioblastomas , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  Hiroyuki Kabasawa,et al.  Measurement of fractional anisotropy using diffusion tensor MRI in supratentorial astrocytic tumors , 2003, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[9]  Hiroyuki Kabasawa,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging for preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in gliomas , 2005, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[10]  C. Calli,et al.  Minimum apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of brain tumors. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[11]  J. Helpern,et al.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of non‐gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  S. Cha,et al.  Update on brain tumor imaging: from anatomy to physiology. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[13]  Jens Fiehler,et al.  Low-grade and anaplastic gliomas: differences in architecture evaluated with diffusion-tensor MR imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[14]  Z. Wu,et al.  Usefulness of diffusion/perfusion-weighted MRI in patients with non-enhancing supratentorial brain gliomas: a valuable tool to predict tumour grading? , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  J. Helpern,et al.  Three‐dimensional characterization of non‐gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  Thomas L Chenevert,et al.  Diffusion imaging: insight to cell status and cytoarchitecture. , 2006, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[17]  R. Henry,et al.  Perfusion, diffusion and spectroscopy values in newly diagnosed cerebral gliomas , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[18]  S. Y. Kim,et al.  A Prospective Study on the Added Value of Pulsed Arterial Spin-Labeling and Apparent Diffusion Coefficients in the Grading of Gliomas , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[19]  D. Figarella-Branger,et al.  Infratentorial pediatric brain tumors: the value of new imaging modalities. , 2007, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[20]  P. Baraldi,et al.  Multimodal MRI in the characterization of glial neoplasms: the combined role of single-voxel MR spectroscopy, diffusion imaging and echo-planar perfusion imaging , 2007, Neuroradiology.

[21]  Paul S Tofts,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient histograms may predict low‐grade glioma subtype , 2007, NMR in biomedicine.

[22]  Ho Yun Lee,et al.  Diffusion-Tensor Imaging for Glioma Grading at 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Analysis of Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity , 2008, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[23]  C. Decaestecker,et al.  Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Cerebral Blood Volume in Brain Gliomas: Relation to Tumor Cell Density and Tumor Microvessel Density Based on Stereotactic Biopsies , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[24]  Ed X. Wu,et al.  Towards better MR characterization of neural tissues using directional diffusion kurtosis analysis , 2008, NeuroImage.

[25]  Adriana Di Martino,et al.  Age‐related non‐Gaussian diffusion patterns in the prefrontal brain , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  Liang Xuan,et al.  Estimation of the orientation distribution function from diffusional kurtosis imaging , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  R. Agid,et al.  Preoperative Grading of Presumptive Low-Grade Astrocytomas on MR Imaging: Diagnostic Value of Minimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[28]  Kevin C. Chan,et al.  Does diffusion kurtosis imaging lead to better neural tissue characterization? A rodent brain maturation study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[29]  P. Basser,et al.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. 1996. , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance.