Choice of cross size in stereology—a cautionary note

The stereological method of cross-counting based on the Cavalieri principle is widely used in neuroimaging to estimate the volume of cerebral structures. Although superficially simple, the stereological technique is validated by arcane mathematical proofs, so the cross size is determined by most investigators on a pragmatic basis with the assumption that the volume calculated is independent of the cross size used. We used three cross sizes (8×8, 5×5 and 3×3 voxels) to estimate the brain volume of six healthy control subjects. The volume estimate using a cross size of 3×3 was 9% larger than with a cross size of 5×5 and the latter was 15% larger than with a cross size of 8×8. We conclude that cross size significantly affects whole brain volume estimates and this result is presumably applicable to other structures whose cross-sectional areas form complex shapes. Investigators should be aware of this fact, especially when trying to make direct comparisons between volume estimates derived from the stereological method using different cross sizes.

[1]  H J Gundersen,et al.  The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction * , 1987, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  Orest B. Boyko,et al.  In vivo assessment of pituitary volume with magnetic resonance imaging and systematic stereology: Relationship to dexamethasone suppression test results in patients , 1992, Psychiatry Research.

[3]  K. Krishnan,et al.  In vivo stereological assessment of human cerebellar volume: effects of gender and age. , 1991, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  K. Ranga R. Krishnan,et al.  Relative accuracy and reproducibility of regional MRI brain volumes for point-counting methods , 1994, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[5]  G. Christensen,et al.  Stereological MRI volumetry of the frontal lobe , 1996, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[6]  K. Krishnan,et al.  A magnetic resonance imaging study of putamen nuclei in major depression , 1991, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[7]  Neil Roberts,et al.  An exploratory study of the relationship between face recognition memory and the volume of medial temporal lobe structures in healthy young males. , 1998, Behavioural neurology.

[8]  Bonaventura Cavalieri,et al.  Geometria degli indivisibili , 1966 .

[9]  K. Ranga R. Krishnan,et al.  A comparison of stereology and segmentation techniques for volumetric measurements of lateral ventricles in magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[10]  Yvette I. Sheline,et al.  Amygdala core nuclei volumes are decreased in recurrent major depression , 1998, Neuroreport.

[11]  G H Whitehouse,et al.  Automatic analysis of cerebral atrophy. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  The assessment of postmortem brain volume; a comparison of stereological and planimetric methodologies , 1999, Neuroradiology.

[13]  J. Csernansky,et al.  Hippocampal atrophy in recurrent major depression. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  M. Horstink,et al.  MR volume estimation of subcortical brain lesions and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid: a simple and accurate stereologic method. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  K. Krishnan,et al.  A magnetic resonance image study of age-related changes in human putamen nuclei. , 1991, Neuroreport.

[16]  M J Puddephat,et al.  The benefit of stereology for quantitative radiology. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  S H Lisanby,et al.  Diminished subcortical nuclei volumes in Parkinson's disease by MR imaging. , 1993, Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum.

[18]  Klaus P. Ebmeier,et al.  Memory impairment in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors is associated with global reduction in brain volume, not focal hippocampal injury. , 2000, Stroke.

[19]  L. Terenius,et al.  Naloxone-induced reversal of schizophrenic hallucinations , 2005, Journal of Neural Transmission.