This work presents an extensible stylesheet language transformation (XSLT)-based approach for automatic generation of the Web ontology language (OWL) from an UML model. Similar solutions that treat this problem are mostly partial because do not use full metamodel potentials. They only show UML usability for ontology development, its transformations into semantic Web languages (e.g. RDF Schema, DAML, DAML+OIL), but its models must be further refined using ontology-specialized tool. None of these approaches enables instance modeling and generation of OWL. Here, we show an architecture that consists of: the ontology definition metamodel defined using meta object facility (MOF) - based on the OWL, as well as the related ontology UML profile (OUP). A transformation, we present here, extends this metamodeling architecture and transforms an ontology from its OUP definition (i.e. XML metadata interchange - XMI) into OWL description. Accordingly, we illustrate how an OUP-developed ontology can be shared with ontological engineering tools (i.e. Protege).
[1]
Stephen Cranefield,et al.
UML for ontology development
,
2002,
The Knowledge Engineering Review.
[2]
Vladan Devedzic,et al.
Understanding ontological engineering
,
2002,
CACM.
[3]
Frank van Harmelen,et al.
Ontology languages for the Semantic Web
,
2005
.
[4]
Vladan Devedzic,et al.
Ontology Modeling and MDA
,
2005,
J. Object Technol..
[5]
Bran Selic,et al.
The Pragmatics of Model-Driven Development
,
2003,
IEEE Softw..
[6]
Conrad Bock,et al.
UML without Pictures
,
2003,
IEEE Softw..
[7]
Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,et al.
What are ontologies, and why do we need them?
,
1999,
IEEE Intell. Syst..
[8]
Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.
Ontology Specification Languages for the Semantic Web
,
2002,
IEEE Intell. Syst..
[9]
Thomas R. Gruber,et al.
A translation approach to portable ontology specifications
,
1993,
Knowl. Acquis..
[10]
Vladan Devedzic,et al.
Reusing Petri Nets Through the Semantic Web
,
2004,
ESWS.