Automation spectrum, inner / outer compatibility and other potentially useful human factors concepts for assistance and automation

Enabled by scientific, technological and societal progress, and pulled by human demands, more and more aspects of our life can be assisted or automated. One example is the transportation domain, where in the sky commercial aircraft are highly automated, and on the roads a gradual revolution takes place towards assisted, highly automated or fully automated cars and trucks. Assistance and automation can have benefits such as higher safety, lower workload, or a fascination of use. Assistance and automation can also come with downsides, especially regarding the interplay between human and technology (e.g., Bainbridge, 1983; Billings, 1997; Norman, 1990; Sarter and Woods, 1995a). In parallel to the technological progress, the science of human factors has to be continuously developed such that it can help to handle the technological complexity without adding new complexity (e.g., Hollnagel, 2007). In this overview article, some fundamental human factors issues for assistance and automation that the authors found useful in their daily work are briefly sketched. Some examples are described how those concepts could be used in the development of assistance and automation systems. While the article deals especially with assistance and automation in vehicles, the underlying concepts might also be useful in other domains.

[1]  Kenneth H. Goodrich,et al.  A Design and Interaction Concept for Aircraft with Variable Autonomy: Application of the H-Mode , 2006 .

[2]  J. Rassmusen,et al.  Information Processing and Human - Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[3]  David Woods,et al.  1. How to make automated systems team players , 2002 .

[4]  Fraedaeric Holzmann Adaptive cooperation between driver and assistant system , 2008 .

[5]  Karim A. Tahboub,et al.  A Semi-Autonomous Reactive Control Architecture , 2001, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[6]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[7]  Paul C. Schutte Distance: A Metric for Flight Deck Design and Function Allocation , 2000 .

[8]  Paul C. Schutte,et al.  The H-Metaphor as a Guideline for Vehicle Automation and Interaction , 2005 .

[9]  R. Brent Gillespie,et al.  Sharing Control Between Humans and Automation Using Haptic Interface: Primary and Secondary Task Performance Benefits , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Anna Schieben,et al.  Prospective Engineering of Vehicle Automation with Design Metaphors: Intermediate report from the H-Mode Projects , 2007 .

[11]  Joan H. Coll,et al.  Cognitive match interface design, a base concept for guiding the development of user friendly computer application packages , 2004, Journal of Medical Systems.

[12]  Ernst Dieter Dickmanns VISION FOR GROUND VEHICLES: HISTORY AND PROSPECTS , 2002 .

[13]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Designing for Flexible Interaction Between Humans and Automation: Delegation Interfaces for Supervisory Control , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[15]  D A Norman,et al.  The 'problem' with automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not 'over-automation'. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  Karl Naab,et al.  Regelsysteme zur Fahrzeugführung und -Stabilisierung in der Automobiltechnik , 1996 .

[17]  Michel Parent Advanced Urban Transport: Automation Is on the Way , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[18]  Paul Schutte,et al.  Complemation: An Alternative to Automation , 1999 .

[19]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Timothy L. Brown,et al.  DRIVING PERFORMANCE AFTER AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TRAVEL IN AN AUTOMATED HIGHWAY SYSTEM , 1998 .

[22]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators , 1978 .

[23]  Christian Löper,et al.  Links oder rechts, schneller oder langsamer? Grundlegende Fragestellungen beim Cognitive Systems Engineering von hochautomatisierter Fahrzeugführung , 2006 .

[24]  Robert B. Allen,et al.  Mental Models and User Models , 1997 .

[25]  Lisanne Bainbridge,et al.  Ironies of automation , 1982, Autom..

[26]  Charles E. Billings,et al.  Aviation Automation: The Search for A Human-centered Approach , 1996 .

[27]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Stanley: The robot that won the DARPA Grand Challenge , 2006, J. Field Robotics.

[28]  W. H. F. Barnes The Nature of Explanation , 1944, Nature.