A Neural Network Model to Translate Brain Developmental Events across Mammalian Species

Translating the timing of brain developmental events across mammalian species using suitable models has provided unprecedented insights into neural development and evolution. More importantly, these models can prove to be useful abstractions and predict unknown events across species from known empirical event timing data retrieved from published literature. Such predictions can be especially useful since the distribution of the event timing data is skewed with a majority of events documented only across a few selected species. The present study investigates the choice of single hidden layer feed-forward neural networks (FFNN) for predicting the unknown events from the empirical data. A leave-one-out cross-validation approach is used to determine the optimal number of units in the hidden layer and the decay parameter for the FFNN. It is shown that unlike the present Finlay-Darlington (FD) model, FFNN does not impose any constraints on the functional form of the model and falls under the class of semiparametric regression models that can approximate any continuous function. The results from FFNN as well as FD model also indicate that a majority of events with large absolute prediction errors correspond to those of primates and late events comprising the tail of event timing data distribution with minimal representation in the empirical data. These results also indicate that accurate prediction of primate events may be challenging.

[1]  Radhakrishnan Nagarajan,et al.  Phylogenetic Proximity Revealed by Neurodevelopmental Event Timings , 2008, Neuroinformatics.

[2]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[3]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[4]  Radhakrishnan Nagarajan,et al.  ttime: an R Package for Translating the Timing of Brain Development Across Mammalian Species , 2010, Neuroinformatics.

[5]  Richard B. Darlington,et al.  Web-based method for translating neurodevelopment from laboratory species to humans , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[6]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[7]  B. Finlay,et al.  Linked regularities in the development and evolution of mammalian brains. , 1995, Science.

[8]  M.H. Hassoun,et al.  Fundamentals of Artificial Neural Networks , 1996, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks , 1991, Neural Networks.

[10]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap CHAPMAN & HALL/CRC , 1993 .

[11]  Walter Krämer,et al.  Review of Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. by W.N. Venables and B.D. Ripley. Springer-Verlag 2002 , 2003 .

[12]  N. Rashevsky The mathematical biophysics of some mental phenomena , 1945 .

[13]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[14]  B. Finlay,et al.  The course of human events: predicting the timing of primate neural development , 2000 .

[15]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[16]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  [Regression modeling strategies]. , 2011, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[17]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[18]  W S McCulloch,et al.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity , 1990, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[19]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[20]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks , 1995 .

[21]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1992, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[22]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[23]  Salvatore Ingrassia,et al.  Neural Network Modeling for Small Datasets , 2005, Technometrics.

[24]  Raúl Rojas,et al.  Neural Networks - A Systematic Introduction , 1996 .