Information seeking behavior of academic scientists

responses to a 15-minute Web-based survey. The survey questions were designed to quantify the transition to electronic communications and how this affects different aspects of information seeking. Significant changes in information seeking behavior were found, including increased reliance on web based resources, fewer visits to the library, and almost entirely electronic communication of information. The results can guide libraries and other information service organizations as they adapt to meet the needs of today's information searchers. Simple descriptive statistics are reported for the individual questions. Additionally, analysis of results is broken out by basic science and medical science departments. The survey tool and protocol used in this study have been adopted for use in a nationwide survey of the information seeking behavior of academic scientists. Introduction As we begin the twenty-first century, we are seeing a dramatic shift towards electronic communication of scientific scholarly information. While much of this was presaged during the computing revolution of the 1980s and 1990s, it has been the recent widespread adoption of Web-based electronic journals that has been the primary driver for change. The escalation of journal subscription costs and limited academic library budgets have paved the way for the electronic distribution of articles. Another significant factor in the adoption of e-articles has been the ease of finding articles on the Web via free search engines such as Google Scholar or from library-sponsored links in online catalogs and subscribed databases. The end result is that searching, retrieving and reading of scientific scholarly articles appears to be moving towards becoming completely electronic, with the only holdout being the preference by many for reading print copies. The transition to primarily electronic communication has the potential to significantly change the ways scholarly communication takes place. These changes range from the convenience of accessing electronic material on the reader's desktop, through the speed at which scholars can communicate new information, to accessibility to larger amounts of the material, and finally to the corresponding problem of sifting through larger amounts of potentially useful materials. While many disciplines of scholarly communication have been impacted, academic science appears to be one of the most affected disciplines. This is due to scientists' need to communicate results rapidly, their early adoption of technology , and their support for other types of digital content such as scientific databases (e.g., the Genbank database, as described in Brown, 2003). This article reports on a survey study designed …

[1]  Paul Ginsparg,et al.  First steps towards electronic research communication , 1994 .

[2]  S. D. De Groote,et al.  Measuring use patterns of online journals and databases. , 2003, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[3]  Margie Wallin,et al.  Use of formal and informal methods to gain information among faculty at an Australian regional university , 2002 .

[4]  Nila A Sathe,et al.  Print versus electronic journals: a preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes. , 2002, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[5]  C. E. Kahn,et al.  Randomized testing of alternative survey formats using anonymous volunteers on the World Wide Web. , 2001, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[6]  M. Elliott,et al.  Conducting Research Surveys Via E-Mail and The Web , 2001 .

[7]  J W Williamson,et al.  Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[8]  H. J. Arnold Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990 .

[9]  G Taubes,et al.  Publication by electronic mail takes physics by storm. , 1993, Science.

[10]  Paul Solomon,et al.  Looking for Information—A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior , 2003, Information Retrieval.

[11]  Liwen Vaughan,et al.  Profile, needs, and expectations of information professionals: What we learned from the 2003 ASIST membership survey , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Learning About the Information Seeking of Interdisciplinary Scholars and Students , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[13]  James Krikelas Information-Seeking Behavior: Patterns and Concepts. , 1983 .

[14]  J. Hurd,et al.  Information-seeking behavior of health sciences faculty: the impact of new information technologies. , 1997, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[15]  Steve Hiller The impact of information technology and online library resources on research, teaching and library use at the University Of Washington , 2002 .

[16]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Reading behaviour and electronic journals , 2002, Learn. Publ..

[17]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Models in information behaviour research , 1999, J. Documentation.

[18]  R. Jones,et al.  Health surveys in the workplace: comparison of postal, email and World Wide Web methods. , 1999, Occupational medicine.

[19]  F. W. Lancaster Toward paperless information systems , 1978 .

[20]  Julie Bichteler,et al.  Information-Seeking Behavior of Geoscientists , 1989 .

[21]  M Nylenna,et al.  Physicians' Internet activities and their perceived coping with the medical information. , 2000, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[22]  Stefanie E. Warlick,et al.  Publication Transformation: Why Authors Choose to Publish in Open Access/Free Full-text Journals , 2006 .

[23]  Gloria J. Leckie,et al.  Modeling the Information Seeking of Professionals: A General Model Derived from Research on Engineers, Health Care Professionals, and Lawyers , 1996, The Library Quarterly.

[24]  Julie M. Hurd,et al.  Information seeking behavior of faculty: use of indexes and abstracts by scientists and engineers , 1992 .

[25]  J. D. Johnson Cancer-Related Information Seeking , 1997 .

[26]  Titus Schleyer,et al.  Research Paper: Methods for the Design and Administration of Web-based Surveys , 2000, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[27]  Cecelia M. Brown The changing face of scientific discourse: Analysis of genomic and proteomic database usage and acceptance , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Judith Palmer,et al.  Scientists and Information: I. Using Cluster Analysis to identify Information Style , 1991, J. Documentation.

[29]  David Ellis,et al.  A Comparison of the Information seeking Patterns of researchers in the Physical and Social Sciences , 1993, J. Documentation.

[30]  Belver C. Griffith,et al.  Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for Psychology , 1972, Inf. Storage Retr..

[31]  Karel Vredenburg,et al.  A survey of user-centered design practice , 2002, CHI.

[32]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Scholarly communication in the digital environment: The 2005 survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes , 2005, Aslib Proc..

[33]  Cecelia M. Brown Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists , 1999 .

[34]  Olaf Gjerløw Aasland,et al.  Keeping professionally updated: Perceived coping and CME profiles among physicians , 1996 .

[35]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Patterns of Journal Use by Faculty at Three Diverse Universities , 2003, D Lib Mag..

[36]  Richard Smith What clinical information do doctors need? , 1996, BMJ.