Phrasing Questions

In a constructive learning setting, a robot builds up beliefs about the world by interacting – interacting with the world, and with other agents. Asking questions is key in such a setting. It provides a mechanism for interactively exploring possibilities, to extend and explain the robot’s beliefs. The paper focuses on how to linguistically phrase questions in dialogue. How well the point of a question gets across depends on how it is put. It needs to be effective in making transparent the agent’s intentions and beliefs behind raising the question, and in helping to scaffold the dialogue such that the desired answers can be obtained. The paper proposes an algorithm for deciding what to include in formulating a question. Its formulation is based on the idea of considering transparency and scaffolding as referential aspects

[1]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  The Evolution of Sharedplans , 1999 .

[2]  John D. Kelleher,et al.  Incremental Generation of Spatial Referring Expressions in Situated Dialog , 2006, ACL.

[3]  John D. Kelleher,et al.  Structural descriptions in human-assisted robot visual learning , 2006, HRI '06.

[4]  John D. Kelleher,et al.  Mediating between Qualitative and Quantitative Representations for Task-Orientated Human-Robot Interaction , 2007, IJCAI.

[5]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  Lexical Acquisition with and without Metacommunication , 2007 .

[6]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Graph-Based Generation of Referring Expressions , 2003, CL.

[7]  Pierre Lison,et al.  Situated Dialogue Processing for Human-Robot Interaction , 2010, Cognitive Systems.

[8]  Michael Brenner,et al.  Continual planning for cross-modal situated clarification in human-robot interaction , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[9]  Andrea L. Thomaz,et al.  Socially guided machine learning , 2006 .

[10]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Clarification dialogues in human-augmented mapping , 2006, HRI '06.

[11]  Judith Masthoff,et al.  Generating Referring Expressions: Making Referents Easy to Identify , 2007, Computational Linguistics.

[12]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  On the Means for Clarification in Dialogue , 2001, SIGDIAL Workshop.

[13]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  Resolving questions, I , 1995 .

[14]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Situated Dialogue and Spatial Organization: What, Where… and Why? , 2007 .

[15]  Jason Baldridge,et al.  Coupling CCG and Hybrid Logic Dependency Semantics , 2002, ACL.

[16]  B. Sherman,et al.  Semantics of Interrogatives , 2006 .

[17]  Nick Hawes,et al.  Incremental , multi-level processing for comprehending situated dialogue in human-robot interaction , 2007 .

[18]  Matthew Purver The Theory and Use of Clarification Requests in Dialogue , 2004 .

[19]  Nick Hawes,et al.  Interactive Learning and Cross-Modal Binding-A Combined Approach ∗ , 2007 .

[20]  Bernhard Nebel,et al.  Continual planning and acting in dynamic multiagent environments , 2006 .

[21]  Gerhard Sagerer,et al.  A computational model of multi-modal grounding , 2006, ACL 2006.

[22]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Discourse structure and intention recognition. , 2000 .

[23]  Patrick Blackburn,et al.  Representation, Reasoning, and Relational Structures: a Hybrid Logic Manifesto , 2000, Log. J. IGPL.

[24]  Staffan Larsson,et al.  Issue-based Dialogue Management , 2002 .

[25]  Robert Dale,et al.  Computational Interpretations of the Gricean Maxims in the Generation of Referring Expressions , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Albert-Ludwigs A Continual Multiagent Planning Approach to Situated Dialogue , 2008 .