Stream communities across a rural–urban landscape gradient

Rapid urbanization throughout the world is expected to cause extensive loss of biodiversity in the upcoming decades. Disturbances associated with urbanization frequently operate over multiple spatial scales such that local species extirpations have been attributed both to localized habitat degradation and to regional changes in land use. Urbanization also may shape stream communities by restricting species dispersal within and among stream reaches. In this patch-dynamics view, anthropogenic disturbances and isolation jointly reduce stream biodiversity in urbanizing landscapes. We evaluated predictions of stream invertebrate community composition and abundance based on variation in environmental conditions at five distinct spatial scales: stream habitats, reaches, riparian corridors and watersheds and their spatial location within the larger three-river basin. Despite strong associations between biodiversity loss and human density in this study, local stream habitat and stream reach conditions were poor predictors of community patterns. Instead, local community diversity and abundance were more accurately predicted by riparian vegetation and watershed landscape structure. Spatial coordinates associated with instream distances provided better predictions of stream communities than any of the environmental data sets. Together, results suggest that urbanization in the study region was associated with reduced stream invertebrate diversity through the alteration of landscape vegetation structure and patch connectivity. These findings suggest that maintaining and restoring watershed vegetation corridors in urban landscapes will aid efforts to conserve freshwater biodiversity.

[1]  L. Meester,et al.  METACOMMUNITY STRUCTURE: SYNERGY OF BIOTIC INTERACTIONS AS SELECTIVE AGENTS AND DISPERSAL AS FUEL , 2004 .

[2]  W. Gurney,et al.  Emergence and lateral dispersal of adult Plecoptera and Trichoptera from Broadstone Stream, U.K. , 1999 .

[3]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship , 2002, Nature.

[4]  J. Allan,et al.  The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales , 1997 .

[5]  Carl Richards,et al.  Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota , 1996 .

[6]  Katie A. Barnas,et al.  Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts , 2005, Science.

[7]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Coexistence in Metacommunities: The Regional Similarity Hypothesis , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[8]  J. David Allan,et al.  Stream Ecology , 1995, Springer Netherlands.

[9]  J. Heino,et al.  Identifying the scales of variability in stream macroinvertebrate abundance, functional composition and assemblage structure , 2004 .

[10]  M. Barbour,et al.  Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton , 1999 .

[11]  A. Huryn,et al.  Multi-scale determinants of secondary production in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) streams , 1998 .

[12]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[13]  G. Wiggins Larvae of the North American caddisfly genera (Trichoptera) , 1978 .

[14]  M. C. Urban Disturbance heterogeneity determines freshwater metacommunity structure , 2004 .

[15]  K. Parris Environmental and spatial variables influence the composition of frog assemblages in sub-tropical eastern Australia , 2004 .

[16]  Awwa,et al.  Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater , 1999 .

[17]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  SPATIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR LINKING WATERSHED LAND COVER TO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS IN STREAMS , 2005 .

[18]  B. R. Davies,et al.  Beyond catchment considerations in the conservation of lotic biodiversity , 2003 .

[19]  M. Palmer,et al.  Dispersal as a regional process affecting the local dynamics of marine and stream benthic invertebrates. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  John Lyons,et al.  Watershed, reach, and riparian influences on stream fish assemblages in the Northern Lakes and Forest Ecoregion, U.S.A. , 2003 .

[21]  J. Meyer,et al.  Streams in the Urban Landscape , 2001 .

[22]  G. Likens,et al.  Stable isotopes identify dispersal patterns of stonefly populations living along stream corridors , 2005 .

[23]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices , 2002 .

[24]  John A. Young,et al.  Influences of upland and riparian land use patterns on stream biotic integrity , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[25]  Jon Norberg,et al.  Biodiversity in metacommunities: Plankton as complex adaptive systems? , 2004 .

[26]  C. Frissell,et al.  Topology of Extinction and Endangerment of Native Fishes in the Pacific Northwest and California (U.S.A.) , 1993 .

[27]  C. Hawkins,et al.  Biodiversity of stream insects: variation at local, basin, and regional scales. , 1998, Annual review of entomology.

[28]  J. Karr Defining and measuring river health , 1999 .

[29]  H. B. N. Hynes,et al.  The Ecology of Running Waters , 1971 .

[30]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4) , 1998 .

[31]  C. Braak,et al.  Unimodal models to relate species to environment , 1988 .

[32]  P. Legendre,et al.  ANALYZING BETA DIVERSITY: PARTITIONING THE SPATIAL VARIATION OF COMMUNITY COMPOSITION DATA , 2005 .

[33]  K. Cummins,et al.  An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America , 1981 .

[34]  Richard H. Norris,et al.  The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction , 2003 .

[35]  W. Fagan,et al.  RARITY, FRAGMENTATION, AND EXTINCTION RISK IN DESERT FISHES , 2002 .

[36]  J. David Allan,et al.  Assessing Biotic Integrity of Streams: Effects of Scale in Measuring the Influence of Land Use/Cover and Habitat Structure on Fish and Macroinvertebrates , 1999, Environmental management.

[37]  R. Ourso,et al.  Identification of linear and threshold responses in streams along a gradient of urbanization in Anchorage, Alaska* , 2003, Hydrobiologia.

[38]  W. Hilsenhoff An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America , 1997 .

[39]  J. C. Morse Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera), 2nd ed. , 1997 .

[40]  A. Rosemond,et al.  Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanisation ( Georgia , , 2003 .

[41]  M. Wiley,et al.  Relative influence of variables at multiple spatial scales on stream macroinvertebrates in the Northern Lakes and Forest ecoregion, U.S.A. , 2003 .

[42]  C. Frissell,et al.  A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context , 1986 .

[43]  B. Peckarsky,et al.  Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America , 1990 .

[44]  B. Malmqvist Aquatic invertebrates in riverine landscapes , 2002 .

[45]  R. Zack Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America , 1991 .

[46]  Margaret A. Palmer,et al.  INVERTEBRATE BIODIVERSITY IN AGRICULTURAL AND URBAN HEADWATER STREAMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT , 2005 .

[47]  R. Briers,et al.  Riparian forestry management and adult stream insects , 2004 .

[48]  W. Fagan CONNECTIVITY, FRAGMENTATION, AND EXTINCTION RISK IN DENDRITIC METAPOPULATIONS , 2002 .

[49]  J. Allan Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems , 2004 .

[50]  D. M. Rosenberg,et al.  Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. , 1994 .

[51]  Stephen James Ormerod,et al.  Dispersal of adult aquatic insects in catchments of differing land use , 2004 .

[52]  B. Malmqvist,et al.  Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[53]  J. Lyons,et al.  Impacts of Urbanization on Stream Habitat and Fish Across Multiple Spatial Scales , 2001, Environmental management.

[54]  D. Jenkins,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary significance of dispersal by freshwater invertebrates , 2003 .