Reverse Engineering of Bacterial Chemotaxis Pathway via Frequency Domain Analysis

Chemotaxis is defined as a behavior involving organisms sensing attractants or repellents and leading towards or away from them. Therefore, it is possible to reengineer chemotaxis network to control the movement of bacteria to our advantage. Understanding the design principles of chemotaxis pathway is a prerequisite and an important topic in synthetic biology. Here, we provide guidelines for chemotaxis pathway design by employing control theory and reverse engineering concept on pathway dynamic design. We first analyzed the mathematical models for two most important kinds of E. coli chemotaxis pathway—adaptive and non-adaptive pathways, and concluded that the control units of the pathway de facto function as a band-pass filter and a low-pass filter, respectively, by abstracting the frequency response properties of the pathways. The advantage of the band-pass filter is established, and we demonstrate how to tune the three key parameters of it—A (max amplification), ω1 (down cut-off frequency) and ω2 (up cut-off frequency) to optimize the chemotactic effect. Finally, we hypothesized a similar but simpler version of the dynamic pathway model based on the principles discovered and show that it leads to similar properties with native E. coli chemotactic behaviors. Our study provides an example of simulating and designing biological dynamics in silico and indicates how to make use of the native pathway's features in this process. Furthermore, the characteristics we discovered and tested through reverse engineering may help to understand the design principles of the pathway and promote the design of artificial chemotaxis pathways.

[1]  H. Berg,et al.  Coordination of flagella on filamentous cells of Escherichia coli , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  Yuhai Tu,et al.  Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  D. Lauffenburger Cell signaling pathways as control modules: complexity for simplicity? , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Karen A. Fahrner,et al.  Control of direction of flagellar rotation in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P K Maini,et al.  Overview of Mathematical Approaches Used to Model Bacterial Chemotaxis I: The Single Cell , 2008, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[6]  Ann M Stock,et al.  Molecular Information Processing: Lessons from Bacterial Chemotaxis* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  A. Laub Efficient multivariable frequency response computations , 1980, 1980 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[8]  Judith P. Armitage,et al.  Behavioural responses of bacteria to light and oxygen , 1997, Archives of Microbiology.

[9]  P. K. Maini,et al.  Overview of Mathematical Approaches Used to Model Bacterial Chemotaxis II: Bacterial Populations , 2008, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[10]  Uri Alon,et al.  Response regulator output in bacterial chemotaxis , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[11]  J. Vilar,et al.  From molecular noise to behavioural variability in a single bacterium , 2004, Nature.

[12]  G. Wadhams,et al.  Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[13]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Systems biology: Reverse engineering the cell , 2008, Nature.

[15]  J. Gallivan,et al.  Guiding bacteria with small molecules and RNA. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  A model of excitation and adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Sebastian Bonhoeffer,et al.  Simulating the evolution of signal transduction pathways. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  H. Berg,et al.  Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  H. Berg,et al.  Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  Michael J. North,et al.  AgentCell: a digital single-cell assay for bacterial chemotaxis , 2005, Bioinform..

[21]  U. Alon,et al.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis , 2022 .

[22]  J. Armitage,et al.  Bacterial chemotaxis: Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Sinorhizobium meliloti--variations on a theme? , 1997, Microbiology.

[23]  James H. Cross,et al.  Reverse engineering and design recovery: a taxonomy , 1990, IEEE Software.

[24]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[25]  Karen A. Fahrner,et al.  CheZ Has No Effect on Flagellar Motors Activated by CheY13DK106YW , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[26]  Richard A. Goldstein,et al.  Evolution of Taxis Responses in Virtual Bacteria: Non-Adaptive Dynamics , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  A. Bren,et al.  How Signals Are Heard during Bacterial Chemotaxis: Protein-Protein Interactions in Sensory Signal Propagation , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[28]  S. Leibler,et al.  An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. , 2000, Science.

[29]  P. Cluzel,et al.  Relationship between cellular response and behavioral variability in bacterial chemotaxis , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  K. Papadopoulos,et al.  A method for measuring bacterial chemotaxis parameters in a microcapillary. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[31]  H. Berg,et al.  Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis , 1982, Cell.

[32]  C. Rao,et al.  Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise , 2002, Nature.