Performance of an image analysis processing system for hen tracking in an environmental preference chamber.

Image processing systems have been widely used in monitoring livestock for many applications, including identification, tracking, behavior analysis, occupancy rates, and activity calculations. The primary goal of this work was to quantify image processing performance when monitoring laying hens by comparing length of stay in each compartment as detected by the image processing system with the actual occurrences registered by human observations. In this work, an image processing system was implemented and evaluated for use in an environmental animal preference chamber to detect hen navigation between 4 compartments of the chamber. One camera was installed above each compartment to produce top-view images of the whole compartment. An ellipse-fitting model was applied to captured images to detect whether the hen was present in a compartment. During a choice-test study, mean ± SD success detection rates of 95.9 ± 2.6% were achieved when considering total duration of compartment occupancy. These results suggest that the image processing system is currently suitable for determining the response measures for assessing environmental choices. Moreover, the image processing system offered a comprehensive analysis of occupancy while substantially reducing data processing time compared with the time-intensive alternative of manual video analysis. The above technique was used to monitor ammonia aversion in the chamber. As a preliminary pilot study, different levels of ammonia were applied to different compartments while hens were allowed to navigate between compartments. Using the automated monitor tool to assess occupancy, a negative trend of compartment occupancy with ammonia level was revealed, though further examination is needed.

[1]  Patrick Wambacq,et al.  Development and application of computer vision systems for use in livestock production , 1991 .

[2]  C-C Yang,et al.  Machine vision system for on-line wholesomeness inspection of poultry carcasses. , 2010, Poultry science.

[3]  I Leinonen,et al.  The effects of welfare-enhancing system changes on the environmental impacts of broiler and egg production. , 2014, Poultry science.

[4]  J. B. Kjaer,et al.  Food, wood, or plastic as substrates for dustbathing and foraging in laying hens: A preference test. , 2010, Poultry science.

[5]  F. Tuyttens,et al.  Observer bias in animal behaviour research: can we believe what we score, if we score what we believe? , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Richard S Gates,et al.  Commissioning an animal preference chamber for behavioral studies with laying hens exposed to atmospheric ammonia , 2013 .

[7]  H. H. Kristensen,et al.  Ammonia and poultry welfare: a review , 2000 .

[8]  R C Newberry,et al.  The effect of cage and house design on egg production and egg weight of White Leghorn hens: an epidemiological study. , 2012, Poultry science.

[9]  F. Estellés,et al.  The influence of the lighting program on broiler activity and dust production. , 2009, Poultry science.

[10]  Hongwei Xin,et al.  Development and application of a novel environmental preference chamber for assessing responses of laboratory mice to atmospheric ammonia. , 2008, Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS.

[11]  Ephraim Maltz,et al.  Automatic lameness detection based on consecutive 3D-video recordings , 2014 .

[12]  Daniel Berckmans,et al.  A COMPUTER VISION METHOD FOR ON-LINE BEHAVIORAL QUANTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALLY CAGED POULTRY , 2006 .

[13]  Daniel Berckmans,et al.  Automatic Identification of Marked Pigs in a Pen Using Image Pattern Recognition , 2013, MDA.

[14]  D. Sergeant,et al.  Computer visual tracking of poultry , 1998 .

[15]  M. Dawkins,et al.  Using behaviour to assess animal welfare , 2004, Animal Welfare.

[16]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Direct Least Square Fitting of Ellipses , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[17]  Glogerley Tatiana Sales An investigation of laying hen interactions with ammoniated environments by means of preference testing , 2012 .

[18]  O. J. Cotterill,et al.  Influence of Ammonia on Egg White Quality , 1954 .

[19]  Claudia Bahr,et al.  Automatic monitoring of pig locomotion using image analysis , 2014 .

[20]  Gong Zhang,et al.  Separation of Touching Grain Kernels in an Image by Ellipse Fitting Algorithm , 2005 .

[21]  Daniel Berckmans,et al.  Development of an early warning system for a broiler house using computer vision , 2013 .

[22]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Local Determination of a Moving Contrast Edge , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[23]  John D. Storey The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value , 2003 .

[24]  F N Reece,et al.  Effect of atmospheric ammonia on laying hen performance. , 1982, Poultry science.

[25]  I. Duncan,et al.  Animal Rights – Animal Welfare: A Scientist’s Assessment , 1981 .

[26]  F. N. Reece,et al.  Effect of atmospheric ammonia on pullets at point of lay. , 1984, Poultry science.

[27]  D Berckmans,et al.  Computer-assisted image analysis to quantify daily growth rates of broiler chickens , 2003, British Poultry Science.

[28]  R C Newberry,et al.  Hen welfare in different housing systems. , 2011, Poultry science.

[29]  Michael H. Dickinson,et al.  Multi-camera real-time three-dimensional tracking of multiple flying animals , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[30]  R. D. Kirkden,et al.  Using preference, motivation and aversion tests to ask scientific questions about animals’ feelings , 2006 .

[31]  Daniel Berckmans,et al.  The automatic monitoring of pigs water use by cameras , 2013 .

[32]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .