Sustainable retrofit potential in lower quality office stock in the central business district

Given the relationship between energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and climate change, the built environment has significant potential to lessen overall emissions. With around half of all greenhouse gas emissions attributed to the built environment; it has a significant role to play in mitigating global warming. With large percentages of office stock structurally vacant in some city centres and only 1 or 2% of new buildings added to the total stock each year; the scope for reductions lay with adaptation of existing buildings. The stock with the highest levels of vacancy and obsolescence offers the highest potential of all. Many cities are now aiming to become carbon neutral. Successful retrofit demands that social, technological, environmental, economic and legislative criteria are addressed. Buildings have to meet user and community needs. City centres comprise a range of different type of office stock with regards to age, size, location, height, tenure and quality. All buildings present challenges and opportunities with regards to retrofit and sustainability and integrating retrofit measures that reduce energy, water and resource consumption. Using a selection of low grade office buildings to develop retrofit profiles, this paper addresses the questions; (a) what is the nature of retrofits in relation to low quality office building stock in the Central Business District (CBD) and, (b) what is the extent and scope for sustainable retrofits to low quality office buildings. Using Melbourne CBD retrofit events of low quality office buildings were analysed between 1998 and 2008 to identify the scope and extent for integrating sustainability into retrofits projects.

[1]  Christopher Gorse,et al.  Refurbishment and Upgrading of Buildings , 2000 .

[2]  A. Tallon,et al.  City Centre Regeneration through Residential Development: Contributing to Sustainability , 2005 .

[3]  Thomas A. Markus,et al.  Building conversion and rehabilitation: Designing for change in building use , 1979 .

[4]  Sara Wilkinson,et al.  The Business Case for incorporating Sustainability in Office Buildings: the Adaptive Reuse of Existing Buildings , 2008 .

[5]  R. Garnaut,et al.  The Garnaut Climate Change Review , 2008 .

[6]  Gregory Howard Snyder SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH ADAPTIVE REUSE: THE CONVERSION OF INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS , 2005 .

[7]  Peter A. Bullen Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings , 2007 .

[8]  David Kincaid,et al.  Adapting Buildings for Changing Uses: Guidelines for Change of Use Refurbishment , 2003 .

[9]  Jessica M Kersting INTEGRATING PAST AND PRESENT: THE STORY OF A BUILDING THROUGH ADAPTIVE REUSE , 2006 .

[10]  R. M. Ball,et al.  Re use potential and vacant industrial premises: revisiting the regeneration issue in Stoke-on-Trent , 2002 .

[11]  R. Garnaut,et al.  The Garnaut Climate Change Review: final report. , 2008 .

[12]  Peter Swallow Managing unoccupied buildings and sites , 1997 .

[13]  Stewart Brand,et al.  How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They're Built , 1997 .

[14]  Sara Wilkinson,et al.  Sustainability and within use office building adapations: A comparison of Dutch and Australian practices , 2011 .

[15]  D. Boyd,et al.  The limits of intelligent office refurbishment , 1993 .