Use of public performance reports: a survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

CONTEXT Publicly released performance reports ("report cards") are expected to foster competition on the basis of quality. Proponents frequently cite the need to inform patient choice of physicians and hospitals as a central element of this strategy. OBJECTIVE To examine the awareness and use of a statewide consumer guide that provides risk-adjusted, in-hospital mortality ratings of hospitals that provide cardiac surgery. DESIGN Telephone survey conducted in 1996. SETTING Pennsylvania, where since 1992, the Pennsylvania Consumer Guide to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft [CABG] Surgery has provided risk-adjusted mortality ratings of all cardiac surgeons and hospitals in the state. PARTICIPANTS A total of 474 (70%) of 673 eligible patients who had undergone CABG surgery during the previous year at 1 of 4 hospitals listed in the Consumer Guide as having average mortality rates between 1% and 5% were successfully contacted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patients' awareness of the Consumer Guide, their knowledge of its ratings, their degree of interest in the report, and barriers to its use. RESULTS Ninety-three patients (20%) were aware of the Consumer Guide, but only 56 (12%) knew about it before surgery. Among these 56 patients, 18 reported knowing the hospital rating and 7 reported knowing the surgeon rating, 11 said hospital and/or surgeon ratings had a moderate or major impact on their decision making, but only 4 were able to specify either or both correctly. When the Consumer Guide was described to all patients, 264 (56%) were "very" or "somewhat" interested in seeing a copy, and 273 (58%) reported that they probably or definitely would change surgeons if they learned that their surgeon had a higher than expected mortality rate in the previous year. A short time window for decision making and a limited awareness of alternative hospitals within a reasonable distance of home were identified as important barriers to use. CONCLUSIONS Only 12% of patients surveyed reported awareness of a prominent report on cardiac surgery mortality before undergoing cardiac surgery. Fewer than 1% knew the correct rating of their surgeon or hospital and reported that it had a moderate or major impact on their selection of provider. Efforts to aid patient decision making with performance reports are unlikely to succeed without a tailored and intensive program for dissemination and patient education.

[1]  Russell L. Stogsdill,et al.  A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1996, JAMA.

[2]  J. Quinn Health care report cards. How good are the HMOs your company chooses? , 1994, Newsweek.

[3]  D B Nash,et al.  How Pennsylvania hospitals have responded to publicly released reports on coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 1998, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[4]  A M Epstein,et al.  Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care. A survey of cardiovascular specialists. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  E. Hannan,et al.  Improving the Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in New York State , 1994 .

[6]  P. Cleary,et al.  What information do consumers want and need? , 1996, Health affairs.

[7]  H. Luft,et al.  Evaluating individual hospital quality through outcome statistics. , 1986, JAMA.

[8]  E L Hannan,et al.  Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. , 1994, JAMA.

[9]  J. Hibbard,et al.  Will quality report cards help consumers? , 1997, Health affairs.

[10]  A. Localio,et al.  The public release of hospital and physician mortality data in Pennsylvania. A case study. , 1997, Medical care.

[11]  Paul R. Rosenbaum,et al.  Evaluation of the complication rate as a measure of quality of care in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 1995 .

[12]  Thomas Jw,et al.  Validating risk-adjusted mortality as an indicator for quality of care. , 1993 .

[13]  M. Mcmullan HCFA's Consumer Information Commitment , 1996, Health care financing review.

[14]  H S Luft,et al.  Chance, continuity, and change in hospital mortality rates. Coronary artery bypass graft patients in California hospitals, 1983 to 1989. , 1993, JAMA.

[15]  H. Luft,et al.  The California Hospital Outcomes Project: using administrative data to compare hospital performance. , 1995, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[16]  D. Fogg Health care report cards. , 1998, AORN journal.

[17]  K N Lohr,et al.  A strategy for quality assurance in Medicare. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  A. Epstein,et al.  Performance reports on quality--prototypes, problems, and prospects. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  A. Comarow America's top HMOs. Behind the HMO rankings. Our second set of ratings covers 223 plans in 46 states. , 1997, U.S. news & world report.

[20]  S. Robinson,et al.  Understanding the quality challenge for health consumers: the Kaiser/AHCPR Survey. , 1997, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[21]  D. Podolsky America's best hospitals. , 1991, U.S. news & world report.

[22]  Felix Hernandez,et al.  A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1991 .

[23]  N. Wintfeld,et al.  Report cards on cardiac surgeons. Assessing New York State's approach. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  E. Hannan,et al.  Public release of cardiac surgery outcomes data in New York: what do New York state cardiologists think of it? , 1997, American heart journal.

[25]  Evaluation of the Complication Rate as a Measure of Quality of Care in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , 1996 .

[26]  D. Longo,et al.  Consumer reports in health care. Do they make a difference in patient care? , 1997, JAMA.