Processing of binaural spatial information in human auditory cortex: Neuromagnetic responses to interaural timing and level differences

This study was designed to test two hypotheses about binaural hearing: (1) that binaural cues are primarily processed in the hemisphere contralateral to the perceived location of a sound; and (2) that the two main binaural cues, interaural timing differences and interaural level differences, are processed in separate channels in the auditory cortex. Magnetoencephalography was used to measure brain responses to dichotic pitches--a perception of pitch created by segregating a narrow band of noise from a wider band of noise--derived from interaural timing or level disparities. Our results show a strong modulation of interhemispheric M100 amplitudes by ITD cues. When these cues simulated source presentation unilaterally from the right hemispace, M100 amplitude changed from a predominant right hemisphere pattern to a bilateral pattern. In contrast, ILD cues lacked any capacity to alter the right hemispheric distribution. These data indicate that intrinsic hemispheric biases are large in comparison to any contralaterality biases in the auditory system. Importantly, both types of binaural cue elicited a circa 200 ms latency object-related negativity component, believed to reflect automatic cortical processes involved in distinguishing concurrent auditory objects. These results support the conclusion that ITDs and ILDs are processed by distinct neuronal populations to relatively late stages of cortical processing indexed by the M100. However information common to the two cues seems to be extracted for use in a subsequent stage of auditory scene segregation indexed by the object related negativity. This may place a new bound on the extent to which sound location cues are processed in separate channels of the auditory cortex.

[1]  Blake W. Johnson,et al.  Object-related brain potentials associated with the perceptual segregation of a dichotically embedded pitch. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Suha Yagcioglu,et al.  Differences between the N1 waves of the responses to interaural time and intensity disparities: scalp topography and dipole sources , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Representation of acoustic events in the primary auditory cortex. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  M. Cynader,et al.  Dichotic pitch: a new stimulus distinguishes normal and dyslexic auditory function , 1998, Neuroreport.

[5]  Raphaël V. Meylan,et al.  The spatio-temporal brain dynamics of processing and integrating sound localization cues in humans , 2006, Brain Research.

[6]  Claude Alain Breaking the wave: Effects of attention and learning on concurrent sound perception , 2007, Hearing Research.

[7]  T. Anderson,et al.  Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments , 1997 .

[8]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Cortical representation of auditory space: information-bearing features of spike patterns. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Philip H Smith,et al.  Projections of physiologically characterized spherical bushy cell axons from the cochlear nucleus of the cat: Evidence for delay lines to the medial superior olive , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  One sound or two? Object-related negativity indexes echo perception , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  M. Scherg,et al.  A Source Analysis of the Late Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Brugge,et al.  Progress in neurophysiology of sound localization. , 1985, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  J. Fell,et al.  Lateralized auditory spatial perception and the contralaterality of cortical processing as studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[14]  K. Kaga,et al.  Sound lateralization in patients with lesions including the auditory cortex: comparison of interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination and interaural intensity difference (IID) discrimination , 1996, Hearing Research.

[15]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[16]  M. Ericson,et al.  The Intelligibility of Multiple Talkers Separated Spatially in Noise , 2001 .

[17]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  A comparison of neural computations underlying stereo vision and sound localization , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[18]  Michael Erb,et al.  Processing of auditory spatial cues in human cortex: An fMRI study , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Claude Alain,et al.  Age-Related Differences in Neuromagnetic Brain Activity Underlying Concurrent Sound Perception , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Claude Alain,et al.  Neural activity associated with distinguishing concurrent auditory objects. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[22]  E. Schröger,et al.  Interaural time and level differences: integrated or separated processing? , 1996, Hearing research.

[23]  Lucas Spierer,et al.  Hemispheric competence for auditory spatial representation. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  G L Romani,et al.  Human brain activation during passive listening to sounds from different locations: An fMRI and MEG study , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[25]  M J Hautus,et al.  Neuromagnetic responses associated with perceptual segregation of pitch. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[26]  Blake W. Johnson,et al.  Event-related potentials for interaural time differences and spectral cues , 2009, Neuroreport.

[27]  L. Rayleigh,et al.  XII. On our perception of sound direction , 1907 .

[28]  E. Macaluso,et al.  High Binaural Coherence Determines Successful Sound Localization and Increased Activity in Posterior Auditory Areas , 2005, Neuron.

[29]  David Poeppel,et al.  The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling in time' , 2003, Speech Commun..

[30]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Two-image lateralization of tones and clicks. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Gerald M. Edelman,et al.  Dynamic aspects of neocortical function , 1984 .

[32]  L. McEvoy,et al.  Human auditory cortical mechanisms of sound lateralization: II. Interaural time differences at sound onset , 1993, Hearing Research.

[33]  Gerard G. Harris,et al.  Binaural Interactions of Impulsive Stimuli and Pure Tones , 1959 .

[34]  W. Jenkins,et al.  Sound localization: effects of unilateral lesions in central auditory system. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  T Wüstenberg,et al.  Asymmetric hemodynamic responses of the human auditory cortex to monaural and binaural stimulation , 2002, Hearing Research.

[36]  Jennifer M Groh,et al.  A Rate Code for Sound Azimuth in Monkey Auditory Cortex: Implications for Human Neuroimaging Studies , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Pickles An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing , 1982 .

[38]  K. Palomäki,et al.  Spatial processing in human auditory cortex: the effects of 3D, ITD, and ILD stimulation techniques. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[39]  Claude Alain,et al.  Contribution of harmonicity and location to auditory object formation in free field: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Jan W. H. Schnupp,et al.  On hearing with more than one ear: lessons from evolution , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  T. Picton,et al.  Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Blake W. Johnson,et al.  Neural activity associated with binaural processes for the perceptual segregation of pitch , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[43]  W A Yost Thresholds for segregating a narrow-band from a broadband noise based on interaural phase and level differences. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  E. Hafter,et al.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency stimuli: the inability to trade time and intensity completely. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  B. Wright,et al.  Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source location , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  D. McAlpine,et al.  A neural code for low-frequency sound localization in mammals , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  David Poeppel,et al.  Neural response correlates of detection of monaurally and binaurally created pitches in humans. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  L. Kontorovich,et al.  Evidence for separate processing in the human brainstem of interaural intensity and temporal disparities for sound lateralization , 1997, Hearing Research.

[50]  M. Schönwiesner,et al.  Representation of interaural temporal information from left and right auditory space in the human planum temporale and inferior parietal lobe. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.