Interpreting Indirect Replies

A model is proposed that explains how people arrive at specific interpretations of indirect replies. The model is based on Grice's (1975) conversational logic, coupled with Goffman's (1967) insights regarding face management. The model assumes that hearers, upon recognizing that a speaker has violated the relevance maxim, will generate an inference in order to make sense of the remark; this inference will then be based on the hearer's belief about why the violation occurred. Face management is assumed to be a major motivation for violating the relevance maxim, and thus it should serve as a frame for interpreting the violation. As a result, the most likely interpretation of an indirect reply is one that would be face-threatening in the situation. The results of three experiments provided support for these propositions. Specifically, relevance violations were generally interpreted as conveying nonliteral meaning. In these situations negative information was most face-threatening, and as a result the replies were usually interpreted as conveying negative information. In addition, when face management as "a reason" for a relevance violation was eliminated or contradicted, relevance violations became much more ambiguous and difficult to comprehend.

[1]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Polite responses to polite requests , 1980, Cognition.

[2]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  Disambiguation by community membership , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[3]  R. Hastie.  Causes and effects of causal attribution , 1984 .

[4]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[5]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[6]  Thomas Holtgraves,et al.  Politeness as universal: Cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use. , 1990 .

[7]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[8]  T. Holtgraves.  Communication in context: effects of speaker status on the comprehension of indirect requests. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  M. Singer,et al.  Validation of causal bridging inferences in discourse understanding. , 1992 .

[10]  Richard Jackson Harris,et al.  Psychology of Pragmatic Implication: Information Processing Between the Lines. , 1978 .

[11]  Ron Tamborini,et al.  SELECTING CRIME DRAMA AND APPREHENSION ABOUT CRIME , 1983 .

[12]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Understanding Metaphorical Comparisons: Beyond Similarity. , 1990 .

[13]  R. Kreuz,et al.  Why Do People Use Figurative Language? , 1994 .

[14]  S. Brennan,et al.  THE FEELING OF ANOTHER'S KNOWING : PROSODY AND FILLED PAUSES AS CUES TO LISTENERS ABOUT THE METACOGNITIVE STATES OF SPEAKERS , 1995 .

[15]  Joong-nam Yang,et al.  Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: general principles and differences due to culture and gender. , 1992 .

[16]  Marcelo Dascal.  Defending literal meaning , 1987 .

[17]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  How Context Makes Metaphor Comprehension Seem 'Special' , 1989 .

[18]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[19]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994 .

[20]  B. Keysar.  On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical interpretations in discourse. , 1989 .

[21]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[22]  Jerry R. Hobbs,et al.  Interpretation as Abduction , 1993, Artif. Intell..

[23]  R. Gibbs.  Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests , 1983 .

[24]  Thomas Holtgraves,et al.  The Linguistic Realization of Face Management: Implications for Language Production and Comprehension, Person Perception, and Cross-Cultural Communication , 1992 .

[25]  T. Holtgraves,et al.  Language structure in social interaction: perceptions of direct and indirect speech acts and interactants who use them. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Conversation memory: the effects of speaker status on memory for the assertiveness of conversation remarks. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  RAYMOND W. GIBBS,et al.  Literal Meaning and Psychological Theory , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Roger S. Brown,et al.  Politeness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies , 1989, Language in Society.

[29]  Leslie A. Baxter,et al.  An investigation of compliance-gaining as politeness. , 1984 .