The staining pattern of brilliant blue G during macular hole surgery: a clinicopathologic study.

PURPOSE To describe the intraoperative staining pattern of the internal limiting membrane (ILM)-specific dye Brilliant Blue G (BBG) in a cohort of patients with idiopathic macular holes; to analyze the associations of the staining pattern with pre- and postoperative variables and to correlate the staining pattern with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the excised ILM. METHODS Fifty-five consecutive patients were studied. The staining pattern was divided into three subtypes based on the intraoperative appearance. The presence of a narrow rim of nonstaining around the macular hole (MH) edge was noted and measured. In the final 21 patients, the excised ILM was examined with TEM. RESULTS The pattern of staining observed was categorized as uniform in 33 patients (60%), patchy nonstaining in 17 (31%), and no visible staining in 5 (9%). The staining pattern correlated with the MH stage. In the patients with uniform or patchy staining, a nonstaining rim was observed in 26 (52%) of the 50. The presence of a rim was associated with a greater hole diameter and lower postoperative visual acuity. The stain pattern correlated significantly with the amount of cellular tissue on the vitreous side of the ILM on TEM, with a greater proportion of multicellular layer membranes and new collagen in the incomplete staining groups. CONCLUSIONS A variety of nonstaining patterns around macular holes can be observed using BBG, and these patterns correlate to the amount of cellular tissue on the vitreous side of the ILM seen histologically. These patterns could be used to guide the ILM peeling requirement or extent in future studies.

[1]  F. Pichi,et al.  Early and late inner retinal changes after inner limiting membrane peeling , 2014, International Ophthalmology.

[2]  N. Scott,et al.  Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[3]  A. Meguro,et al.  Staining internal limiting membrane with a mixture of BBG and sodium hyaluronate , 2012, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[4]  F. Folgar,et al.  Characterization of vitreoretinal interface disorders using OCT in the interventional phase 3 trials of ocriplasmin. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Stanley Chang Controversies regarding internal limiting membrane peeling in idiopathic epiretinal membrane and macular hole. , 2012, Retina.

[6]  J. Stephenson,et al.  A comparison of several methods of macular hole measurement using optical coherence tomography, and their value in predicting anatomical and visual outcomes , 2012, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[7]  J. Dawczynski,et al.  Ultrastructure of the Membrana Limitans Interna after Dye-Assisted Membrane Peeling , 2011, Ophthalmologica.

[8]  A. Kampik,et al.  Sequential epiretinal membrane removal with internal limiting membrane peeling in brilliant blue G-assisted macular surgery , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[9]  W. Prime,et al.  Does the presence of an epiretinal membrane alter the cleavage plane during internal limiting membrane peeling? , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[10]  A. Kampik,et al.  PATHOLOGY OF THE MACULAR HOLE RIM IN FLAT-MOUNTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE SPECIMENS , 2009, Retina.

[11]  T. Williamson,et al.  Predicting visual success in macular hole surgery , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[12]  Y. Mizutani,et al.  Double staining with brilliant blue G and double peeling for epiretinal membranes. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[13]  S. Priglinger,et al.  VITAL DYES FOR MACULAR SURGERY: A Comparative Electron Microscopy Study of the Internal Limiting Membrane , 2009, Retina.

[14]  S. Uffer,et al.  ULTRASTRUCTURAL CHANGES OF THE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE REMOVED DURING INDOCYANINE GREEN ASSISTED PEELING VERSUS CONVENTIONAL SURGERY FOR IDIOPATHIC MACULAR EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE , 2009, Retina.

[15]  S. Priglinger,et al.  An in vivo evaluation of Brilliant Blue G in animals and humans , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[16]  Y. Hata,et al.  Cellular migration associated with macular hole: a new method for comprehensive bird's-eye analysis of the internal limiting membrane. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  Y. Goto,et al.  BRILLIANT BLUE G SELECTIVELY STAINS THE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE/BRILLIANT BLUE G–ASSISTED MEMBRANE PEELING , 2006, Retina.

[18]  P. Massin,et al.  Relationship between macular hole size and the potential benefit of internal limiting membrane peeling , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[19]  Christos Haritoglou,et al.  Ultrastructure of the vitreomacular interface in full-thickness idiopathic macular holes: a consecutive analysis of 100 cases. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  G. Soubrane,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the use of indocyanine green for peeling the internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery , 2006, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[21]  A. Reichenbach,et al.  Peeling of the basal membrane in the human retina: ultrastructural effects. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[22]  A. Kampik,et al.  Indocyanine green can distinguish posterior vitreous cortex from internal-limiting membrane during vitrectomy with removal of epiretinal membrane. , 2003, Retina.

[23]  C Haritoglou,et al.  Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  P. Massin,et al.  Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[25]  A. Kampik,et al.  Indocyanine green selectively stains the internal limiting membrane. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  J D Gass,et al.  Reappraisal of biomicroscopic classification of stages of development of a macular hole. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  金森 きよ子 Coomassie Brilliant Blue G 250による蛋白定量法-2-自動化法への応用 , 1980 .

[28]  A. Kampik,et al.  Plasmin-assisted vitrectomy eliminates cortical vitreous remnants , 2002, Eye.