Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science.

People can make decisions to join a group based solely on exposure to that group's physical environment. Four studies demonstrate that the gender difference in interest in computer science is influenced by exposure to environments associated with computer scientists. In Study 1, simply changing the objects in a computer science classroom from those considered stereotypical of computer science (e.g., Star Trek poster, video games) to objects not considered stereotypical of computer science (e.g., nature poster, phone books) was sufficient to boost female undergraduates' interest in computer science to the level of their male peers. Further investigation revealed that the stereotypical broadcast a masculine stereotype that discouraged women's sense of ambient belonging and subsequent interest in the environment (Studies 2, 3, and 4) but had no similar effect on men (Studies 3, 4). This masculine stereotype prevented women's interest from developing even in environments entirely populated by other women (Study 2). Objects can thus come to broadcast stereotypes of a group, which in turn can deter people who do not identify with these stereotypes from joining that group.

[1]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[2]  S. Bem.  The measurement of psychological androgyny. , 1974, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[3]  H. Markus.  Self-schemata and processing information about the self. , 1977 .

[4]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  Self-Images and Cigarette Smoking in Adolescence , 1981 .

[5]  Kenneth D. Bahn,et al.  Developmental Recognition of Consumption Symbolism , 1982 .

[6]  J. Kihlstrom,et al.  Prototype matching: a strategy for social decision making. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Particularistic and universalistic evaluation in the social comparison process. , 1988 .

[9]  Birger Wernerfelt,et al.  Advertising Content When Brand Choice Is a Signal , 1990 .

[10]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. , 1992 .

[11]  J. Richards,et al.  When Gulliver travels : social context, psychological closeness, and self-appraisals , 1992 .

[12]  A. Astin.  What matters in college? : four critical years revisited , 1994 .

[13]  M. Brewer,et al.  Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  John R. Gilbert,et al.  The best jobs in america , 1994 .

[15]  Harvey S. Rosen,et al.  Following in Her Footsteps? Faculty Gender Composition and Women's Choices of College Majors , 1995 .

[16]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  The Differential Impact of Gender Ratios on Women and Men: Tokenism, Self-Confidence, and Expectations , 1995 .

[18]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  F. Gibbons,et al.  Predicting young adults' health risk behavior. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Barbara A. Gutek,et al.  Reactions to Perceived Sex Discrimination , 1996 .

[21]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Superstars and me : Predicting the impact of role models on the self , 1997 .

[22]  C. Montmarquette,et al.  How do Young People Choose College Majors , 2002 .

[23]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[24]  S. Gaulin,et al.  Superior spatial memory of women: Stronger evidence for the gathering hypothesis , 1997 .

[25]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[26]  E. Pinel,et al.  Stigma consciousness: the psychological legacy of social stereotypes. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  A. Borg.  What Draws Women to and Keeps Women in Computing? , 1999 .

[28]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .

[29]  K. Howe,et al.  The Pipeline and Student Perceptions of Schooling: Good News and Bad News , 1999 .

[30]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender-Stereotypic Images of Occupations Correspond to the Sex Segregation of Employment , 1999 .

[31]  Michael Inzlicht,et al.  A Threatening Intellectual Environment: Why Females Are Susceptible to Experiencing Problem-Solving Deficits in the Presence of Males , 2000, Psychological science.

[32]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Examining the “Male, Antisocial” Stereotype of High Computer Users , 2000 .

[33]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Unlocking the Clubhouse : Women in Computing by Allan Fisher , 2015 .

[34]  A. Bakker,et al.  Accentuate the negative : Social images in the prediction and promotion of condom use , 2001 .

[35]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[36]  S. Gosling,et al.  A room with a cue: personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Math Male , Me Female , Therefore Math Me , 2002 .

[38]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. , 2002 .

[39]  Shira Gabriel,et al.  When you and I are "we," you are not threatening: the role of self-expansion in social comparison. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  S. Spencer,et al.  Consuming Images: How Television Commercials that Elicit Stereotype Threat Can Restrain Women Academically and Professionally , 2002 .

[41]  D. Marx,et al.  Female Role Models: Protecting Women’s Math Test Performance , 2002 .

[42]  B. Buunk,et al.  Inhibitory effects of drinker and nondrinker prototypes on adolescent alcohol consumption. , 2002, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[43]  C. G. Lord,et al.  Alleviating women’s mathematics stereotype threat through salience of group achievements , 2003 .

[44]  T. Mussweiler.  Comparison processes in social judgment: mechanisms and consequences. , 2003, Psychological review.

[45]  Jennifer Crocker,et al.  When grades determine self-worth: consequences of contingent self-worth for male and female engineering and psychology majors. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  Denise Sekaquaptewa,et al.  Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance , 2003 .

[47]  N. Dasgupta,et al.  Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping , 2004 .

[48]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[49]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  B. Hannover,et al.  Self-to-Prototype Matching as a Strategy for Making Academic Choices. Why High School Students Do Not like Math and Science. , 2004 .

[51]  Dominique Muller,et al.  We can do it: the interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Motivating Boys and Motivating Girls: Does Teacher Gender Really Make a Difference? , 2005 .

[53]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  "I am us": negative stereotypes as collective threats. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  S. Spencer,et al.  Clearing the air: identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  William Aspray,et al.  Women and Information Technology : Research on Underrepresentation , 2010 .

[56]  D. Bybee,et al.  Fitting in Matters , 2006, Psychological science.

[57]  Glenn Adams,et al.  The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation , 2006 .

[58]  C. Heath,et al.  Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains , 2007 .

[59]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Priming us and them: automatic assimilation and contrast in group attitudes. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  From Stereotype Threat to Stereotype Threats: Implications of a Multi-Threat Framework for Causes, Moderators, Mediators, Consequences, and Interventions , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[61]  Jeffrey Barlow.  Dreaming in Code , 2007 .

[62]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[63]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  A question of belonging: race, social fit, and achievement. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  Dov Cohen,et al.  Precarious manhood. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[66]  William Aspray,et al.  A Critical Review of the Research on Women's Participation in Postsecondary Computing Education , 2008 .

[67]  Valerie Purdie-Vaughns,et al.  Social identity contingencies: how diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  Chad E. Forbes,et al.  An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. , 2008, Psychological review.

[69]  J. Bosson,et al.  Precarious Manhood and Displays of Physical Aggression , 2009, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[70]  V. Plaut,et al.  Is Multiculturalism or Color Blindness Better for Minorities? , 2009, Psychological science.

[71]  S. Fiske,et al.  Comprar Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology | Benjamin L. Miller | 9780470129111 | Wiley , 2009 .