Response Entropy Increases During Painful Stimulation

Frontal electromyography (FEMG) may increase during painful stimulation and indicate patient arousal. The Datex-Ohmeda Entropy Module calculates state entropy (SE) of the electroencephalogram (EEG; 0.8-32 Hz) and response entropy (RE) of EEG and FEMG (0.8-47 Hz). We determined whether RE increases above SE (RE − SE), an indication of FEMG, increase during painful stimuli and if this is related to paralysis or level of anesthesia. With the unanesthetized baseline measurement, SE was 89 ± 2 and RE was 98 ± 2. During paralysis and anesthesia with either 0.8% (n = 10) or 1.4% (n = 10) isoflurane, SE decreased to 63 ± 7 and 34 ± 14, respectively, and the RE − SE difference decreased 90%. Before recovery from paralysis, arterial catheter or head pin placement increased RE − SE above unanesthetized levels in eight patients (five treated with 0.8% and three with 1.4% isoflurane), consistent with an increase in FEMG. The elevated RE − SE difference was related to a significant increase in SE, blood pressure, and heart rate. After recovery from paralysis, tetanic stimulation of the ulnar nerve increased the RE − SE difference above unanesthetized levels in 8 of 20 patients (6 treated with 0.8% and 2 with 1.4% isoflurane). In these patients, SE increased significantly. The remaining 12 patients did not show an increase in RE − SE during tetanic stimulation and SE did not increase. We conclude that increased RE during painful stimulation was not dependent on recovery from paralysis but was seen more often in patients anesthetized with 0.8% compared with 1.4% isoflurane. This suggests that RE reflects FEMG and may be useful to identify inadequate anesthesia and patient arousal during painful stimuli.

[1]  W. Barcellos,et al.  A comparison of the response of hand and facial muscles to non‐depolarising relaxants , 1988, Anaesthesia.

[2]  Ali Mofeez,et al.  Biasing Effect Of The Electromyogram On Bis: A Controlled Study During High-Dose Fentanyl Induction , 2002, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[3]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Human brain oscillatory activity phase‐locked to painful electrical stimulations: A multi‐channel EEG study , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[4]  G. Fraser,et al.  Validating the Sedation-Agitation Scale with the Bispectral Index and Visual Analog Scale in adult ICU patients after cardiac surgery , 2001, Intensive Care Medicine.

[5]  Toshiki Yoshimine,et al.  Neuromagnetic gamma-band activity in the primary and secondary somatosensory areas , 2003, Neuroreport.

[6]  D A Steyn-Ross,et al.  Comparison of changes in electroencephalographic measures during induction of general anaesthesia: influence of the gamma frequency band and electromyogram signal. , 2001, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  T. Tammisto,et al.  Spontaneous EMG activity for detection of arousal during general anaesthesia--comparison between recordings from frontal and neck musculature. , 1991, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[8]  M. Struys,et al.  Comparison of spontaneous frontal EMG, EEG power spectrum and bispectral index to monitor propofol drug effect and emergence , 1998, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[9]  W W Mapleson,et al.  Age-related iso-MAC charts for isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane in man. , 2003, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[11]  M Paloheimo,et al.  Assessment of anaesthetic adequacy with upper facial and abdominal wall EMG. , 1989, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[12]  A. Yli-Hankala,et al.  Auditory steady-state response, upper facial EMG, EEG and heart rate as predictors of movement during isoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia. , 1994, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  A. Yli-Hankala,et al.  Description of the Entropy™ algorithm as applied in the Datex‐Ohmeda S/5™ Entropy Module , 2004, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.