Conscious Vision Proceeds from Global to Local Content in Goal-Directed Tasks and Spontaneous Vision

The reverse hierarchy theory (Hochstein and Ahissar, 2002) makes strong, but so far untested, predictions on conscious vision. In this theory, local details encoded in lower-order visual areas are unconsciously processed before being automatically and rapidly combined into global information in higher-order visual areas, where conscious percepts emerge. Contingent on current goals, local details can afterward be consciously retrieved. This model therefore predicts that (1) global information is perceived faster than local details, (2) global information is computed regardless of task demands during early visual processing, and (3) spontaneous vision is dominated by global percepts. We designed novel textured stimuli that are, as opposed to the classic Navon's letters, truly hierarchical (i.e., where global information is solely defined by local information but where local and global orientations can still be manipulated separately). In line with the predictions, observers were systematically faster reporting global than local properties of those stimuli. Second, global information could be decoded from magneto-encephalographic data during early visual processing regardless of task demands. Last, spontaneous subjective reports were dominated by global information and the frequency and speed of spontaneous global perception correlated with the accuracy and speed in the global task. No such correlation was observed for local information. We therefore show that information at different levels of the visual hierarchy is not equally likely to become conscious; rather, conscious percepts emerge preferentially at a global level. We further show that spontaneous reports can be reliable and are tightly linked to objective performance at the global level. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Is information encoded at different levels of the visual system (local details in low-level areas vs global shapes in high-level areas) equally likely to become conscious? We designed new hierarchical stimuli and provide the first empirical evidence based on behavioral and MEG data that global information encoded at high levels of the visual hierarchy dominates perception. This result held both in the presence and in the absence of task demands. The preferential emergence of percepts at high levels can account for two properties of conscious vision, namely, the dominance of global percepts and the feeling of visual richness reported independently of the perception of local details.

[1]  Olivier R. Joubert,et al.  The Time-Course of Visual Categorizations: You Spot the Animal Faster than the Bird , 2009, PloS one.

[2]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Intermodal selective attention in monkeys. I: distribution and timing of effects across visual areas. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Act Quickly, Decide Later: Long-latency Visual Processing Underlies Perceptual Decisions but Not Reflexive Behavior , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Global Versus Local Processing in the Absence of Low Spatial Frequencies , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  P. Schyns,et al.  Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Michael S. Ambinder,et al.  Change blindness , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[8]  J Wilson,et al.  Spatial Frequency and Selective Attention to Local and Global Information , 1987, Perception.

[9]  E. William Yund,et al.  Spatial frequency and attention: Effects of level-, target-, and location-repetition on the processing of global and local forms , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  David Navon,et al.  The forest revisited: More on global precedence , 1981 .

[11]  A. Oliva,et al.  From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .

[12]  E. Yund,et al.  An ERP study of the global precedence effect: the role of spatial frequency , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  E W Yund,et al.  The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized stimuli , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  David Whitney,et al.  Ensemble perception: Summarizing the scene and broadening the limits of visual processing. , 2012 .

[15]  Mika Koivisto,et al.  Is reentry critical for visual awareness of object presence? , 2012, Vision Research.

[16]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[17]  Michael A. Cohen,et al.  Consciousness cannot be separated from function , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  A. Oliva,et al.  Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[20]  D R Badcock,et al.  Low-Frequency Filtering and the Processing of Local—Global Stimuli , 1990, Perception.

[21]  G L Shulman,et al.  The Role of Spatial-Frequency Channels in the Perception of Local and Global Structure , 1986, Perception.

[22]  M. Bar A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  G. Fairweather,et al.  Relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic programs: A multicriteria comparison of four programs for three different patient groups. , 1960 .

[24]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  J. Bullier Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[26]  H. Neumann,et al.  The Role of Attention in Figure-Ground Segregation in Areas V1 and V4 of the Visual Cortex , 2012, Neuron.

[27]  M S Landy,et al.  Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[28]  Abel G. Oliva,et al.  Gist of a scene , 2005 .

[29]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[30]  Zohar Z. Bronfman,et al.  We See More Than We Can Report , 2014, Psychological science.

[31]  R. Desimone,et al.  A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  L. Lagasse,et al.  Effects of good form and spatial frequency on global precedence , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  R. Kimchi Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  J. Changeux,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.5 May 2006 Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy , 2022 .

[35]  A. Treisman,et al.  Statistical processing: computing the average size in perceptual groups , 2005, Vision Research.

[36]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[37]  A. Oliva,et al.  Flexible, Diagnosticity-Driven, Rather Than Fixed, Perceptually Determined Scale Selection in Scene and Face Recognition , 1997, Perception.

[38]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Attending to global versus local stimulus features modulates neural processing of low versus high spatial frequencies: an analysis with event-related brain potentials , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[39]  C. N. Boehler,et al.  Rapid recurrent processing gates awareness in primary visual cortex , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  A. Oliva,et al.  The Representation of Simple Ensemble Visual Features Outside the Focus of Attention , 2008, Psychological science.

[41]  P. Perona,et al.  What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene? , 2007, Journal of vision.

[42]  A. Oliva,et al.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations , 1999, Cognition.

[43]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[44]  Carole Peyrin,et al.  On the Specific Role of the Occipital Cortex in Scene Perception , 2012 .

[45]  B. Fischer,et al.  Visual field representations and locations of visual areas V1/2/3 in human visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[46]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Individual differences in ensemble perception reveal multiple, independent levels of ensemble representation. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[47]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  M. Landy,et al.  Discrimination of orientation-defined texture edges , 1995, Vision Research.

[49]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  Attentive tracking of objects vs. substances , 2010 .

[50]  J. Bergen,et al.  Texture segregation and orientation gradient , 1991, Vision Research.

[51]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Two distinct modes of sensory processing observed in monkey primary visual cortex (V1) , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[53]  Jason M Haberman,et al.  Efficient summary statistical representation when change localization fails , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[54]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[55]  P. Roelfsema Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[56]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Anchoring visual subjective experience in a neural model: The coarse vividness hypothesis , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  How Rich Is Consciousness? the Partial Awareness Hypothesis Opinion , 2022 .

[58]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  The Neural Substrates and Timing of Top–Down Processes during Coarse-to-Fine Categorization of Visual Scenes: A Combined fMRI and ERP Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  M R Lamb,et al.  Do response time advantage and interference reflect the order of processing of global- and local-level information? , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.