On-pump coronary artery bypass graft operation: Is one crossclamp application better than two?

[1]  G. Stone,et al.  Incidence, predictors, and impact of neurological events in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the ACUITY trial. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  J. Messenger,et al.  Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Is Associated With Worse Arterial and Saphenous Vein Graft Patency and Less Effective Revascularization: Results From the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Trial , 2012, Circulation.

[3]  B. Seifert,et al.  Aortic no-touch technique makes the difference in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2011, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  P. Bannon,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting with and without manipulation of the ascending aorta--a meta-analysis. , 2011, Heart, lung & circulation.

[5]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  M. Vallely,et al.  Anaortic techniques reduce neurological morbidity after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. , 2008, Heart, lung & circulation.

[7]  M. Navaratnarajah,et al.  For patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at higher risk of stroke is the single cross-clamp technique of benefit in reducing the incidence of stroke? , 2008, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery.

[8]  T. Yan,et al.  Anaortic off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: The criterion standard for minimization of neurologic injury. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.