Getting some perspective: using process descriptions to index document history

Process descriptions are used in workflow and related systems to describe the flow of work and organisational responsibility in business processes, and to aid in coordination. However, the division of a working process into a sequence of steps provides only a partial view of the work involved. In many cases, the performance of individual tasks in a larger process may depend on interpretations and understandings of how other aspects of the work were conducted. We present an example from an ethnographic investigation of one particular organisation, and introduce a mechanism, which we call “Perspectives,” for dealing with it. A “Perspective” uses the process description to provide an index into the history of a document moving through a process. Perspectives allow workflow systems to manage and present information about the execution of specific process instances within the general frame of abstract process descriptions.

[1]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[2]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Office procedure as practical action: models of work and system design , 1983, TOIS.

[3]  Keith D. Swenson,et al.  A Business Process Environment Supporting Collaborative Planning , 1994 .

[4]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Taking the work out of workflow: Mechanisms for document-centered collaboration , 1999, ECSCW.

[5]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities , 1998, CSCW '98.

[6]  Stefan Jablonski,et al.  A comprehensive approach to flexibility in workflow management systems , 1999, WACC '99.

[7]  Carla Simone,et al.  Computational Mechanisms of Interaction for CSCW , 1993 .

[8]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Taking the work out of workflow: mechanisms for document-centered collaboration , 1999 .

[9]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Workspace Awareness in Real-Time Distributed Groupware: Framework, Widgets, and Evaluation , 1996, BCS HCI.

[10]  R. Harper,et al.  Inside the IMF: An Ethnography of Documents, Technology, and Organizational Action , 1997 .

[11]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Freeflow: mediating between representation and action in workflow systems , 1996, CSCW '96.

[12]  Dan Shapiro,et al.  Faltering from ethnography to design , 1992, CSCW '92.

[13]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  SOCIAL EVALUATION OF THE USER INTERFACE: WHO DOES THE WORK AND WHO GETS THE BENEFIT? , 1987 .

[14]  Sunil K. Sarin,et al.  Experiences with workflow management: issues for the next generation , 1994, CSCW '94.

[15]  Stefan Jablonski,et al.  A comprehensive approach to flexibility in workflow management systems , 1999 .

[16]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[17]  Simon M. Kaplan,et al.  Flexible, active support for collaborative work with ConversationBuilder , 1992, CSCW '92.

[18]  WWAC: WinWin abstraction based decision coordination , 1999, WACC.

[19]  Eric Freeman,et al.  Lifestreams: Organizing your Electronic Life* , 1995 .

[20]  Allan MacLean,et al.  Crossing the Border: Document Coordination and the Integration of Processes in a Distributed Organisation , 1998 .

[21]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Plans as Situated Action: An Activity Theory Approach to Workflow Systems , 1997, ECSCW.

[22]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Exploding the interface: experiences of a CSCW network , 1993, INTERCHI.