A computer simulation of jury decision making.

[1]  J. H. Davis.  Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[2]  Reid Hastie,et al.  Models of jury decision making: A critical review. , 1979 .

[3]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  Analyzing the Decision-Making Process of the American Jury , 1975 .

[4]  Shari Seidman Diamond,et al.  A Courtroom Experiment on Juror Selection and Decision-Making , 1974 .

[5]  H. Gerard,et al.  Conformity and group size. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Garold Stasser,et al.  Opinion Change During Group Discussion , 1977 .

[7]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Quality of Group Judgment , 1977 .

[8]  P. Suppes,et al.  Mathematical methods in small group processes , 1963 .

[9]  Harry T. Reis,et al.  Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research. , 1977 .

[10]  Robert L. Thorndike,et al.  The Effect of Discussion upon the Correctness of Group Decisions, when the Factor of Majority Influence is Allowed For , 1938 .

[11]  Stuart S. Nagel,et al.  Deductive Modeling to Determine an Optimum Jury Size and Fraction Required to Convict , 1975 .

[12]  Norbert L. Kerr.  Beautiful and Blameless: Effects of Victim Attractiveness and Responsibility on Mock Jurors' Verdicts , 1978 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[14]  John M. Levine,et al.  Consensus and conformity , 1969 .

[15]  Harry Kalven,et al.  The American Jury , 1967 .

[16]  Richard Lempert,et al.  Uncovering "Nondiscernible" Differences: Empirical Research and the Jury-Size Cases , 1975 .

[17]  A. B. Sørensen.  Mathematical Models in Sociology , 1978 .

[18]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  A study of some social factors in perception. , 1935 .

[19]  Lynn E. Miller,et al.  Reducing the effects of juror bias. , 1978 .

[20]  Rosenberg La,et al.  Group size, prior experience, and conformity. , 1961 .

[21]  T. Scheff,et al.  The Jury and the Defense of Insanity. , 1968 .

[22]  C. Nemeth,et al.  From the 50s to the 70s: Women in jury deliberations. , 1976 .

[23]  D. Graham,et al.  Experimental Studies of Social Influence in Simple Judgment Situations , 1962 .

[24]  Angelo C. Valenti,et al.  Differential effects of jury size on verdicts following deliberation as a function of the apparent guilt of a defendant. , 1975 .

[25]  J. Brehm,et al.  Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance , 1962 .

[26]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Social Status in Jury Deliberations , 1957 .

[27]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[28]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Sex Role Differentiation in Jury Deliberations , 1956 .

[29]  Kinley Larntz.  Reanalysis of Vidmar's data on the effects of decision alternatives on verdicts of simulated jurors , 1975 .

[30]  Herbert Friedman,et al.  Trial by Jury: Criteria for Convictions, Jury Size and Type I and Type II Errors , 1972 .

[31]  Bernard P. Cohen,et al.  Conflict, conformity, and social status , 1975 .

[32]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Victim consequences, sentence severity, and decision processes in mock juries. , 1977 .

[33]  Sarah Lichtenstein,et al.  Don't attribute this to Reverend Bayes. , 1978 .

[34]  Michael G. Rumsey,et al.  A Case of Rape: Sentencing Judgments of Males and Females , 1977, Psychological reports.

[35]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors. , 1976 .

[36]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules. , 1975 .

[37]  D. Byrne,et al.  The defendant's dilemma: effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  M. Rothschild,et al.  A Model of the Jury Decision Process , 1979, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[39]  B. Thornton,et al.  Effect of Rape Victim's Attractiveness in a Jury Simulation , 1977 .

[40]  John R. Anderson.  Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. , 1978 .

[41]  S. Asch.  Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments , 1951 .

[42]  Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance. , 1963 .

[43]  Bruce D. Sales,et al.  A Critical Evaluation of the Systematic Approach To Jury Selection , 1977 .

[44]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Changes in group members' decision preferences during discussion: An illustration with mock juries. , 1976 .

[45]  Ewart A. C. Thomas,et al.  Apparent Weight of Evidence, Decision Criteria, and Confidence Ratings in Juror Decision Making , 1976 .

[46]  Steven J. Brams,et al.  Optimal Jury Selection: A Game-Theoretic Model for the Exercise of Peremptory Challenges , 1978, Oper. Res..

[47]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[48]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  Modeling Jury Verdicts in the American Legal System , 1974 .

[49]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  A Study of Poisson's Models for Jury Verdicts in Criminal and Civil Trials , 1973 .

[50]  F. Restle,et al.  The road to agreement: Subgroup pressures in small group consensus processes. , 1974 .

[51]  Harry Kalven,et al.  The American Jury , 1966 .

[52]  L. Festinger.  Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance , 1964 .