A quick, easy and non‐intrusive method for underwater volume and surface area evaluation of benthic organisms by 3D computer modelling

Summary In order to understand physiological, ecological and biological processes, it is often crucial to determine an organism's volume and surface area (SA). Most of the available methods require sacrificing the organism or at least removing it from its natural habitat, in order to measure these parameters. Advances in computer vision algorithms now allow us to determine these parameters using non-destructive, three-dimensional modelling. The addition of cloud computing and the availability of freeware make this tool widely accessible. Photographs of corals and sponges were taken in natura and used to create digital 3D models using the ‘structure-from-motion’ technique. Modelling was done online using 123D Catch freeware (Autodesk Inc.). Volume and SA of the corals and sponges were calculated from these 3D models. Comparing in situ 3D modelling to current measuring methods (e.g. water displacement, paraffin dipping) showed that volume calculation by 3D modelling gave fast results accurate to within 8% of estimated true volume. Using cloud computing enabled the creation of a 3D model in <30 min. SA accuracy was found to differ significantly, depending on the shape of the modelled object, with an accuracy ranging widely from 2% to 18%. We found that in situ volume and SA measurements created by 3D modelling enable easy, fast and non-intrusive studies of benthic aquatic organisms, without removing the subject organisms from their habitat, thus enabling continuous study of natural growth over extended time periods. The freely available freeware, along with ease of use, makes this method accessible to many areas of research.

[1]  Reinhard Koch,et al.  Visual Modeling with a Hand-Held Camera , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[2]  Jaap van der Meer,et al.  Metabolic theories in ecology , 2006 .

[3]  Livio De Luca,et al.  Automated Image-Based Procedures for Accurate Artifacts 3D Modeling and Orthoimage Generation , 2011 .

[4]  O. Hoegh-Guldberg,et al.  Increasing the accuracy of surface area estimation using single wax dipping of coral fragments , 2010, Coral Reefs.

[5]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  Image‐based 3D Modelling: A Review , 2006 .

[6]  D. Nistér.  Automatic passive recovery of 3D from images and video , 2004 .

[7]  Sandy Raimondo,et al.  Estimating 3-dimensional colony surface area of field corals , 2007 .

[8]  Marco Gaiani,et al.  Virtualized Architectural Heritage: New Tools and Techniques , 2000, IEEE Multim..

[9]  John Stimson,et al.  The temporal pattern and rate of release of zooxanthellae from the reef coral Pocillopora damicornis (Linnaeus) under nitrogen-enrichment and control conditions , 1991 .

[10]  M. Isabel Ribeiro,et al.  3D environment modelling using laser range sensing , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[11]  W. Scherle,et al.  A simple method for volumetry of organs in quantitative stereology. , 1970, Mikroskopie.

[12]  David Nist.  Automatic Passive Recovery of 3D from Images and Video , 2004 .

[13]  J. Marsh,et al.  Primary productivity of reef-building calcareous red algae , 1970 .

[14]  J. Bythell,et al.  Three-dimensional morphometric measurements of reef corals using underwater photogrammetry techniques , 2001, Coral Reefs.

[15]  Thomas P. Kersten,et al.  Image-Based Low-Cost Systems for Automatic 3D Recording and Modelling of Archaeological Finds and Objects , 2012, EuroMed.

[16]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Automatic 3D model acquisition and generation of new images from video sequences , 1998, 9th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 1998).

[17]  M. Lo Brutto,et al.  Computer Vision Tools for 3D Modelling in Archaeology , 2012 .

[18]  S. Cocito,et al.  3-D reconstruction of biological objects using underwater video technique and image processing , 2003 .

[19]  Antonio Vettore,et al.  Effective 3D modeling of heritage sites , 2003, Fourth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2003. 3DIM 2003. Proceedings..

[20]  Michael D. Abràmoff,et al.  Image processing with ImageJ , 2004 .

[21]  G. Holmes,et al.  Estimating three-dimensional surface areas on coral reefs , 2008 .

[22]  Ron Johnstone,et al.  Using three-dimensional surface area to compare the growth of two Pocilloporid coral species , 2008 .

[23]  D. Reichle,et al.  Relation of Body Size to Food Intake, Oxygen Consumption, and Trace Element Metabolism in Forest Floor Arthropods , 1968 .

[24]  Dieter Fritsch,et al.  Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[25]  Sabry F. El-Hakim,et al.  Detailed 3D reconstruction of large-scale heritage sites with integrated techniques , 2004, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[26]  O. Hoegh‐Guldberg,et al.  A comparative study of methods for surface area and three‐dimensional shape measurement of coral skeletons , 2010 .

[27]  Miriam Cabrelles,et al.  Range‐Based Versus Automated Markerless Image‐Based Techniques For Rock Art Documentation , 2014 .

[28]  M. Parsons,et al.  Characterizing Coral Condition Using Estimates of Three-dimensional Colony Surface Area , 2006, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[29]  C. Wild,et al.  Coral surface area quantification–evaluation of established techniques by comparison with computer tomography , 2008, Coral Reefs.

[30]  Cettina Santagati,et al.  IMAGE-BASED MODELING TECHNIQUES FOR ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE 3D DIGITALIZATION: LIMITS AND POTENTIALITIES , 2013 .

[31]  Z. Dubinsky,et al.  A photographic, computerized method for in situ growth measurements in reef-building cnidarians , 2004, Coral Reefs.