[Preparation and in vitro evaluation of tissue engineered osteochondral integration of multi-layered scaffold].

Objective The tissue engineered osteochondral integration of multi-layered scaffold was prepared and the related mechanical properties and biological properties were evaluated to provide a new technique and method for the repair and regeneration of osteochondral defect. Methods According to blend of different components and proportion of acellular cartilage extracellular matrix of pig, nano-hydroxyapatite, and alginate, the osteochondral integration of multi-layered scaffold was prepared by using freeze-drying and physical and chemical cross-linking technology. The cartilage layer was consisted of acellular cartilage extracellular matrix; the middle layer was consisted of acellular cartilage extracellular matrix and alginate; and the bone layer was consisted of nano-hydroxyapatite, alginate, and acellular cartilage extracellular matrix. The biological and mechanics characteristic of the osteochondral integration of multi-layered scaffold were evaluated by morphology observation, scanning electron microscope observation, Micro-CT observation, porosity and pore size determination, water absorption capacity determination, mechanical testing (compression modulus and layer adhesive strength), biocompatibility testing [L929 cell proliferation on scaffold assessed by MTT assay, and growth of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled Sprague Dawley rats' bone marrow mesenchumal stem cells (BMSCs) on scaffolds]. Results Gross observation and Micro-CT observation showed that the scaffolds were closely integrated with each other without obvious discontinuities and separation. Scanning electron microscope showed that the structure of the bone layer was relatively dense, while the structure of the middle layer and the cartilage layer was relatively loose. The pore structures in the layers were connected to each other and all had the multi-dimensional characteristics. The porosity of cartilage layer, middle layer, and bone layer of the scaffolds were 93.55%±2.90%, 93.55%±4.10%, and 50.28%±3.20%, respectively; the porosity of the bone layer was significantly lower than that of cartilage layer and middle layer ( P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between cartilage layer and middle layer ( P>0.05). The pore size of the three layers were (239.66±35.28), (153.24±19.78), and (82.72±16.94) μm, respectively, showing significant differences between layers ( P<0.05). The hydrophilic of the three layers were (15.14±3.15), (13.65±2.98), and (5.32±1.87) mL/g, respectively; the hydrophilic of the bone layer was significantly lower than that of cartilage layer and middle layer ( P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between cartilage layer and middle layer ( P>0.05). The compression modulus of the three layers were (51.36±13.25), (47.93±12.74), and (155.18±19.62) kPa, respectively; and compression modulus of the bone layer was significantly higher than that of cartilage layer and middle layer ( P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between cartilage layer and middle layer ( P>0.05). The osteochondral integration of multi-layered scaffold was tightly bonded with each layer. The layer adhesive strength between the cartilage layer and the middle layer was (18.21±5.16) kPa, and the layer adhesive strength between the middle layer and the bone layer was (16.73±6.38) kPa, showing no significant difference ( t=0.637, P=0.537). MTT assay showed that L929 cells grew well on the scaffolds, indicating no scaffold cytotoxicity. GFP-labeled rat BMSCs grew evenly on the scaffolds, indicating scaffold has excellent biocompatibility. Conclusion The advantages of three layers which have different performance of the tissue engineered osteochondral integration of multi-layered scaffold is achieved double biomimetics of structure and composition, lays a foundation for further research of animal in vivo experiment, meanwhile, as an advanced and potential strategy for osteochondral defect repair.

[1]  C. Hung,et al.  Current strategies for integrative cartilage repair , 2017, Connective tissue research.

[2]  D. Jiang,et al.  Preparation of a biphase composite scaffold and its application in tissue engineering for femoral osteochondral defects in rabbits , 2017, International Orthopaedics.

[3]  Xin Fu,et al.  Structurally and Functionally Optimized Silk‐Fibroin–Gelatin Scaffold Using 3D Printing to Repair Cartilage Injury In Vitro and In Vivo , 2017, Advanced materials.

[4]  J. Cooper-White,et al.  Tailoring biomaterial scaffolds for osteochondral repair. , 2017, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[5]  H Weinans,et al.  The use of a cartilage decellularized matrix scaffold for the repair of osteochondral defects: the importance of long-term studies in a large animal model. , 2017, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  Hsin-Yi Lin,et al.  Collagen-PVA aligned nanofiber on collagen sponge as bi-layered scaffold for surface cartilage repair , 2017, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[7]  B. Mandal,et al.  Mimicking Hierarchical Complexity of the Osteochondral Interface Using Electrospun Silk-Bioactive Glass Composites. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[8]  A. A. Zadpoor,et al.  Solute transport at the interface of cartilage and subchondral bone plate: Effect of micro-architecture. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Ju Su,et al.  Evaluation of Magnetic Nanoparticle-Labeled Chondrocytes Cultivated on a Type II Collagen–Chitosan/Poly(Lactic-co-Glycolic) Acid Biphasic Scaffold , 2017, International journal of molecular sciences.

[10]  E. Figallo,et al.  A new bi-layered scaffold for osteochondral tissue regeneration: In vitro and in vivo preclinical investigations. , 2017, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[11]  J. Oliveira,et al.  Basic science of osteoarthritis , 2016, Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics.

[12]  Wenxue Jiang,et al.  Comparison of three-dimensional printing and vacuum freeze-dried techniques for fabricating composite scaffolds. , 2016, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[13]  F. O'Brien,et al.  Cell-free multi-layered collagen-based scaffolds demonstrate layer specific regeneration of functional osteochondral tissue in caprine joints. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[14]  Stefan Fischer,et al.  Single-step scaffold-based cartilage repair in the knee: A systematic review. , 2016, Journal of orthopaedics.

[15]  Louise Jennings,et al.  Review of the biomechanics and biotribology of osteochondral grafts used for surgical interventions in the knee , 2015, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[16]  A. Bigi,et al.  Multi-Layered Scaffolds for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering: In Vitro Response of Co-Cultured Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. , 2015, Macromolecular bioscience.

[17]  L Vikingsson,et al.  Relationship between micro-porosity, water permeability and mechanical behavior in scaffolds for cartilage engineering. , 2015, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[18]  Maurilio Marcacci,et al.  Scaffold-based cartilage treatments: with or without cells? A systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence. , 2015, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[19]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Development of novel three-dimensional printed scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. , 2015, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[20]  Fergal J O'Brien,et al.  A biomimetic multi-layered collagen-based scaffold for osteochondral repair. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[21]  Hongkai Wu,et al.  Gradient‐Regulated Hydrogel for Interface Tissue Engineering: Steering Simultaneous Osteo/Chondrogenesis of Stem Cells on a Chip , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[22]  Maurilio Marcacci,et al.  Scaffold-based repair for cartilage healing: a systematic review and technical note. , 2013, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[23]  Zohreh Izadifar,et al.  Strategic Design and Fabrication of Engineered Scaffolds for Articular Cartilage Repair , 2012, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[24]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  Osteochondral tissue engineering: scaffolds, stem cells and applications , 2012, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[25]  J H Brekke,et al.  Regeneration of articular cartilage--evaluation of osteochondral defect repair in the rabbit using multiphasic implants. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.