Effectiveness of kinesiotaping and Acu-TENS on maternal and neonatal outcomes in the first stage of labor among primigravidas

Background: The common reason for rise in elective Caesarean Section (CS) rate among primigravidas is maternal request due to labor pain fear. Many non-pharmacological pain relief strategies are available to help women cope with labor pain, providing a positive and satisfactory birth experience. The objective of this study was to evaluate effects of KT and Acu-TENS on maternal and neonatal outcomes in primigravidas. Methods: 40 full-term primigravidas with an age range of 20-40 years were enrolled into the study by convenience sampling method and divided into 2 groups. Group A received KT and Group B received Acu-TENS. Both groups received breathing exercises. Pain assessment at various cervical dilatation levels were carried out for all participants before and after treatment using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Duration of active phase in first stage labor, mode of delivery and neonatal well-being were measured following delivery. Results: Group A experienced VAS score reduction significantly more than Group B, p=0.004; <0.05. There was no significant change in active phase duration of first stage labor between Group A and Group B, p=0.319; >0.05. CS rate was increased in Group A [35% (7/20)] than in Group B [25% (5/20)], but neonatal outcomes were not different. Conclusions: This study proves that KT produced significantly better pain relief than Acu-TENS in first stage labor among primigravidas. Acu-TENS showed reduction in active phase duration of first stage labor than KT. Both interventions can safely be used non-invasively for labor pain relief.

[1]  H. Dahlen,et al.  Complementary therapies for labour and birth study: a randomised controlled trial of antenatal integrative medicine for pain management in labour , 2016, BMJ Open.

[2]  Jun Zhang,et al.  The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014 , 2016, PloS one.

[3]  M. Kamalifard,et al.  The efficacy of massage therapy and breathing techniques on pain intensity and physiological responses to labor pain. , 2012, Journal of caring sciences.

[4]  A. Urooj,et al.  Influence of Maternal Factors on Mode of Delivery and Birth Weight in Urban Pregnant Women , 2009 .

[5]  Ann L. Bianchi,et al.  A practical approach to labor support. , 2008, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[6]  D. Kang,et al.  Effects of SP6 acupressure on labor pain and length of delivery time in women during labor. , 2004, Journal of alternative and complementary medicine.

[7]  K. Trout The neuromatrix theory of pain: implications for selected nonpharmacologic methods of pain relief for labor. , 2004, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[8]  G. Yıldırım,et al.  The effect of breathing and skin stimulation techniques on labour pain perception of Turkish women. , 2004, Pain research & management.

[9]  Sylvia T. Brown,et al.  Women’s Evaluation of Intrapartum Nonpharmacological Pain Relief Methods Used during Labor , 2001, Journal of Perinatal Education.

[10]  L. Papile The Apgar score in the 21st century. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Evans,et al.  Neonatal wellbeing after elective caesarean delivery with general, spinal, and epidural anaesthesia. , 1993, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[12]  E. W. Smith The Relationship Between One and Five-Minute Agpar Scores and Linguistic Functioning as Measured by the Test of Language Development , 1982 .

[13]  A. Rimm,et al.  Rising cesarean section rate. , 1981, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  B. Barlowe,et al.  Physiotherapy in obstetrics and gynaecology. , 1978, British medical journal.