Correction of presbyopia in hyperopia with a center-distance, paracentral-near technique using the Technolas 217z platform.

PURPOSE To analyze the results of hyperopic patients treated with a peripheral presbyLASIK algorithm for the correction of presbyopia. METHODS The study included 44 eyes of 22 hyperopic patients treated with a peripheral presbyLASIK technique using a Technolas 217z excimer laser. Mean patient age was 56 years (range: 47 to 72 years), mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was +1.21 +/- 0.77 diopters (D) (range: +0.50 to +4.00 D), and mean spectacle near addition was +1.76 +/- 0.42 D (range: +1.00 to +2.75 D). The Peripheral Multifocal LASIK (PML) ablation pattern creates a multifocal corneal profile over a 6.5-mm diameter, performing the distance correction first in a 6-mm optical zone and then near correction in a 6.5-mm zone. Main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) for near and distance, spherical equivalent refraction, contrast sensitivity, and corneal aberrations. RESULTS Six months postoperatively, mean binocular UCVA was 1.06 +/- 0.13 for distance and 0.84 +/- 0.14 for near. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.42 D (range: -1.12 to +0.87 D). Two (4.5%) eyes lost 1 line of BSCVA for distance and near vision, and 20 (45%) eyes gained 1 line of distance BSCVA. Contrast sensitivity decreased for 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles/degree. Corneal aberration analysis showed a slight increase in coma and decrease in spherical aberration. CONCLUSIONS The peripheral presbyLASIK technique used in this study is a safe and efficient treatment that may improve functional near vision in presbyopic patients with low and moderate hyperopia (from +0.50 to +3.00 D).

[1]  F. Malecaze,et al.  Scleral expansion bands for presbyopia. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[2]  J. Garbus,et al.  Topographic analysis and visual acuity after radial keratotomy. , 1988, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  S D Klyce,et al.  Topographic analysis and visual acuity after radial keratotomy. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology-glaucoma.

[4]  S. Jain,et al.  Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery. , 1996, Survey of ophthalmology.

[5]  Alain P Telandro Pseudo-accommodative cornea: a new concept for correction of presbyopia. , 2004, Journal of refractive surgery.

[6]  W. Charman,et al.  Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses: mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[7]  David Mas,et al.  Optical analysis of presbyLASIK treatment by a light propagation algorithm. , 2007, Journal of refractive surgery.

[8]  F G Holz,et al.  [PresbyLASIK: treatment approaches with the excimer laser]. , 2006, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[9]  L J Maguire,et al.  A multifocal lens effect as a complication of radial keratotomy. , 1989, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[10]  Jorge L Alió,et al.  Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: Comparative clinical study , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  Sudi Patel,et al.  Correction of presbyopia by technovision central multifocal LASIK (presbyLASIK). , 2006, Journal of refractive surgery.

[12]  J. Garbus,et al.  Multifocal corneal topographic changes with excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.