Multidisciplinary co-design optimization of the structure and control systems for large cable shovel considering cross-disciplinary interaction

Large cable shovel is a complex mechatronic system used for primary production in the open pit mine. For such structure-control highly coupled system, the conventional sequential design strategy (structure design followed by the control optimization in sequence) cannot manage this interaction adequately and explicitly. In addition, the large cable shovel consists of large number of sub-systems and/or disciplines, which also poses challenges to the global optimal design for large cable shovel. To enhance large cable shovel’s performance, an integrated design optimization strategy combining the structure-control simultaneous design (co-design) and the multidisciplinary design optimization is established in this study to perform the global optimization for the large cable shovel. In this proposed multidisciplinary co-design, the point-to-point trajectory planning method is extended to achieve the simultaneous optimization of the structure and control system. Besides the structure and control, the dynamics/vibration and energy consumption are taken into account in this multidisciplinary co-design. The objectives are to minimize the energy consumption per volume of ore and to minimize the excavating time. By comparing the multidisciplinary co-design and the conventional sequential design, it is found that the multidisciplinary co-design can not only make large cable shovel’s structure more compact with relatively small vibration, but also generate more flexible control speeds by making the best of the power motors.

[1]  Rong-Fong Fung,et al.  Energy-saving trajectory planning for a toggle mechanism driven by a PMSM , 2013 .

[2]  Wei Sun,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization of hard rock tunnel boring machine using collaborative optimization , 2018 .

[3]  Jeremy S. Agte,et al.  Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis , 1998 .

[4]  Volkan Patoglu,et al.  Co-Design Strategies for Optimal Variable Stiffness Actuation , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[5]  Insup Lee,et al.  Co-design of control and platform with dropped signals , 2013, 2013 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS).

[6]  Samuel Frimpong,et al.  Efficient Cable Shovel Excavation in Surface Mines , 2011 .

[7]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Implementation and Performance Issues in Collaborative Optimization , 1996 .

[8]  Bin Yao,et al.  Time Optimal Contouring Control of Industrial Biaxial Gantry: A Highly Efficient Analytical Solution of Trajectory Planning , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[9]  Oleg Sergiyenko,et al.  Trajectory Tracking Control of an Excavator Arm Using Guaranteed Cost Control , 2015, ICINCO.

[10]  Wei Sun,et al.  Energy-minimum optimization of the intelligent excavating process for large cable shovel through trajectory planning , 2018, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[11]  Xuemei Ren,et al.  Structure/controller Co-design of Multi-motor Driving System with Fixed-time Dynamic Surface Backstepping Control , 2019, 2019 Chinese Control Conference (CCC).

[12]  Wei Sun,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization of tunnel boring machine considering both structure and control parameters under complex geological conditions , 2016 .

[13]  B Wei,et al.  Mechanics performance of three-degree-of-freedom excavating mechanism of an electric shovel , 2011 .

[14]  Rong-Fong Fung,et al.  Trajectory planning based on minimum absolute input energy for an LCD glass-handling robot , 2014 .

[15]  Vipulkumar Patel,et al.  STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION OF MINI HYDRAULIC BACKHOE EXCAVATOR ATTACHMENT USING FEA APPROACH , 2013 .

[16]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Response surface based, concurrent subspace optimization for multidisciplinary system design , 1996 .

[17]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Multidisciplinary and Multifidelity Design Optimization of Electric Vehicle Battery Thermal Management System , 2018, Journal of Mechanical Design.

[18]  Frederik Zahle,et al.  Aeroelastic multidisciplinary design optimization of a swept wind turbine blade , 2017 .

[19]  Rafael Palacios,et al.  Optimal vibration control and co-design of very flexible actuated structures , 2016 .

[20]  Ilian A. Bonev,et al.  Minimum-Time Trajectory Planning and Control of a Pick-and-Place Five-Bar Parallel Robot , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[21]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Integrating linear physical programming within collaborative optimization for multiobjective multidisciplinary design optimization , 2005 .

[22]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[23]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Research on Optimal Excavating Trajectory of Large Mining Shovel , 2014 .

[24]  R. Fung,et al.  Minimum-Energy Point-to-Point Trajectory Planning for a Motor-Toggle Servomechanism , 2012, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[25]  Mao Li,et al.  Surrogate based multidisciplinary design optimization of lithium-ion battery thermal management system in electric vehicles , 2017 .

[26]  Sen Yan,et al.  Co‐design of a filtering antenna based on multilayer structure , 2019, International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering.

[27]  Shu Wen Lin,et al.  A New Method of the Constraints Expression and Handling for Excavator Boom Structural Optimization , 2012 .

[28]  Xiaohui Li,et al.  Real-Time Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Urban Driving: Framework, Algorithms, and Verifications , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[29]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization , 1994, SIAM J. Optim..