论文信息 - A comparison of magnetic and radiographic imaging artifact after using three types of metal rods: stainless steel, titanium, and vitallium. - 字舞流文

A comparison of magnetic and radiographic imaging artifact after using three types of metal rods: stainless steel, titanium, and vitallium.

P. Knott | S. Mardjetko | Patrick T Knott | Steven M Mardjetko | Richard H Kim | Timothy M Cotter | Megan M Dunn | Shivani T Patel | Matthew J Spencer | Alan S Wilson | David S Tager | M. Dunn | R. Kim | T. Cotter | D. Tager

[1] L. Everson. MRI of the Musculoskeletal System. 2nd ed , 1991 .

[2] N. Ebraheim,et al. The effect of metallic implants on magnetic resonance imaging. A brief note. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3] R A Novelline,et al. Comparison of CT Imaging Artifacts from Craniomaxillofacial Internal Fixation Devices , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4] B. Rosen,et al. Comparison of artifact from craniomaxillofacial internal fixation devices : magnetic resonance imaging , 1994 .

[5] J A Patton,et al. MR imaging instrumentation and image artifacts. , 1994, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6] P. Sullivan,et al. Cranio‐Orbital Reconstruction: Safety and Image Quality of Metallic Implants on CT and MRI Scanning , 1994, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7] Buddy D. Ratner,et al. Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine , 1996 .

[8] T. Berquist. MRI of the Musculoskeletal System , 2000 .

[9] Kenneth A Buckwalter,et al. Multichannel CT: evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopedic hardware. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10] S. Eustace,et al. Imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopedic hardware: comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.