Study of double combination evaluation of urban comprehensive disaster risk

Aiming at solving the difficult problem of inconsistent single-method evaluation results in comprehensive disaster risk assessment, this paper presents an evaluation method based on a combination of the ranking value and the evaluation value. First, the seven methods of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE), the set pair analysis (SPA), the improved grey target analysis (IGT), the fuzzy stochastic simulation (FSS), the grey relational degree analysis (GRA), the extension matter element evaluation (EME), and the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) are used to conduct urban comprehensive disaster risk assessment. Second, to ensure the degree of correlation between individual evaluation methods and make full use of more information to achieve the purpose of complementary advantages, the Kendall synergy coefficient, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, and the comprehensive support coefficient are used as the single-method compatibility consistency test standards. The combined evaluation methods of the cyclic correction model and support model are used to combine the single evaluation results, and the highly coordinated comprehensive disaster risk ranking value and evaluation value are obtained through repeated tests, thus constructing a highly scientific and reasonable dual combination evaluation model. Finally, through analysis and comparison of the final combined ranking and evaluation values of 31 provinces, municipalities directly under the central government and autonomous regions in China under the dual combination mode, it is verified that the dual combination idea can obtain evaluation results with high convergence and credibility, solve the problem of inconsistent evaluation results of multiple methods, provide a new research idea and method for measuring the comprehensive disaster risk of cities, and provide a scientific basis for efficiently serving comprehensive risk prevention management and various urban planning and construction work.

[1]  X. Ding,et al.  Flood risk assessment based on hydrodynamic model and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation with GIS technique , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[2]  Zheng Han,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of geological hazard safety along railway engineering using a novel method: a case study of the Sichuan-Tibet railway, China , 2020 .

[3]  Peijun Shi,et al.  Research on integrated disaster risk governance in the context of global environmental change , 2010 .

[4]  Yaolong Liu,et al.  The assessment of traffic accident risk based on grey relational analysis and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method , 2017, Natural Hazards.

[5]  Gao Jiao-jia Fuzzy stochastic simulation method for comprehensive risk assessment of regional natural disaster , 2014 .

[6]  Zhenghong Tang,et al.  An examination of midwestern US cities’ preparedness for climate change and extreme hazards , 2018, Natural Hazards.

[7]  Chaofeng Liu,et al.  A study on dynamic evaluation of urban integrated natural disaster risk based on vague set and information axiom , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[8]  Fang Weihua,et al.  Research on Global Environmental Change and Integrated Disaster Risk Governance , 2009 .

[9]  Mark Pelling,et al.  Disaster risk, climate change and international development: scope for, and challenges to, integration. , 2006, Disasters.

[10]  P. Shi,et al.  Living with global climate diversity—suggestions on international governance for coping with climate change risk , 2012, International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.

[11]  Changqing Song,et al.  Spatial distribution patterns of global natural disasters based on biclustering , 2018, Natural Hazards.

[12]  X. Guan,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of urban flood-bearing risks based on combined compound fuzzy matter-element and entropy weight model , 2020, Natural Hazards.