Effective multidimensional resistivity inversion using finite-element techniques

SUMMARY This paper describes the development of a multidimensional resistivity inversion method that is validated using two- and three-dimensional synthetic pole‐pole data. We use a finite-element basis to represent both the electric potentials of each source problem and the conductivities describing the model. A least-squares method is used to solve the inverse problem. Using a leastsquares method rather than a lower-order method such as non-linear conjugate gradients, has the advantage that quadratic terms in the functional to be optimized are treated implicitly allowing for a near minimum to be found after a single iteration in problems where quadratic terms dominate. Both the source problem for a potential field and the least-squares problem are solved using (linear) pre-conditioned conjugate gradients. Coupled with the use of parallel domain decomposition solution methods, this provides the numerical tools necessary for efficient inversion of multidimensional problems. Since the electrical inverse problem is ill-conditioned, special attention is given to the use of model-covariance matrices and data weighting to assist the inversion process to arrive at a physically plausible result. The model-covariance used allows for preferential model regularization in arbitrary directions and the application of spatially varying regularization. We demonstrate, using two previously published synthetic models, two methods of improving model resolution away from sources and receivers. The first method explores the possibilities of using depth-dependent and directionally varying smoothness constraints. The second method preferentially applies additional weights to data known to contain information concerning poorly resolved areas. In the given examples, both methods improve the inversion model and encourage the reconstruction algorithm to create model structure at depth.

[1]  Stephen K. Park,et al.  Inversion of pole-pole data for 3-D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes , 1991 .

[2]  Multidomain Chebyshev spectral method for 3-D dc resistivity modeling , 1996 .

[3]  Gerald W. Hohmann,et al.  Topographic effects in resistivity and induced-polarization surveys , 1980 .

[4]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[5]  A. Dey,et al.  Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped three-dimensional structures , 1979 .

[6]  K. Spitzer A 3-D FINITE-DIFFERENCE ALGORITHM FOR DC RESISTIVITY MODELLING USING CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHODS , 1995 .

[7]  Loyce M. Adams,et al.  An M-Step preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Method for Parallel Computation , 1983, ICPP.

[8]  C. Swift,et al.  INVERSION OF TWO‐DIMENSIONAL RESISTIVITY AND INDUCED‐POLARIZATION DATA , 1978 .

[9]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .

[10]  Yoshihiro Sugimoto,et al.  Shallow high‐resolution 2-D and 3-D electrical crosshole imaging , 1999 .

[11]  2-D Electrical Modeling over Undulated Topography , 1998 .

[12]  O. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Finite elements and approximation , 1983 .

[13]  A. Weller,et al.  Monitoring Hydraulic Experiments by Complex Conductivity Tomography , 1997 .

[14]  A. Dey,et al.  Resistivity modelling for arbitrarily shaped two-dimensional structures , 1979 .

[15]  Fast resistivity/IP inversion using a low‐contrast approximation , 1996 .

[16]  Hiromasa Shima,et al.  2-D and 3-D resistivity image reconstruction using crosshole data , 1992 .

[17]  J. Nitao,et al.  Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement , 1992 .

[18]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  3-D inversion of magnetic data , 1996 .

[19]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The finite element method, fourth edition; volume 2: solid and fluid mechanics, dynamics and non-linearity , 1991 .

[20]  Robert G. Ellis,et al.  The pole-pole 3-D Dc-resistivity inverse problem: a conjugategradient approach , 1994 .

[21]  Nariida C. Smith,et al.  Two-Dimensional DC Resistivity Inversion for Dipole-Dipole Data , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  C. C. Pain,et al.  A neural network graph partitioning procedure for grid-based domain decomposition , 1999 .

[23]  Louis Allaud,et al.  Schlumberger: The history of a technique , 1977 .

[24]  W. Daily,et al.  The effects of noise on Occam's inversion of resistivity tomography data , 1996 .

[25]  Jie Zhang,et al.  3-D resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients , 1995 .

[26]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[27]  David Isaacson,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1999, SIAM Rev..

[28]  R. Barker,et al.  Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion1 , 1996 .

[29]  Alan C. Tripp,et al.  Two-dimensional resistivity inversion , 1984 .

[30]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  Inversion of 3-D DC resistivity data using an approximate inverse mapping , 1994 .

[31]  A. Binley,et al.  Flow pathways in porous media: electrical resistance tomography and dye staining image verification , 1996 .

[32]  A. Weller,et al.  Induced‐polarization modelling using complex electrical conductivities , 1996 .