Starting from scratch and building brick by brick in comprehension

During narrative comprehension, readers construct representations of the situation described by a text, called situation models. Theories of situation model construction and event comprehension posit two distinct types of situation model updating: incremental updating of individual situational dimensions, and global updates in which an old model is abandoned and a new one created. No research to date has directly tested whether readers update their situation models incrementally, globally, or both. We investigated whether both incremental and global updating occur during narrative comprehension. Participants typed what they were thinking while reading an extended narrative, and then segmented the narrative into meaningful events. Each typed think-aloud response was coded for whether it mentioned characters, objects, space, time, goals, or causes. There was evidence for both incremental and global updating: Readers mentioned situation dimensions more when those dimensions changed, controlling for the onset of a new event. Readers also mentioned situation dimensions more at points when a new event began than during event middles, controlling for the presence of situational change. These results support theories that claim that readers engage in both incremental and global updating during extended narrative comprehension.

[1]  R. Barker,et al.  One boy's day : a specimen record of behavior , 1951 .

[2]  Darren Newtson,et al.  The objective basis of behavior units. , 1977 .

[3]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  William F. Brewer,et al.  Memory for goal-directed events , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  K. Haberlandt,et al.  The episode schema in story processing , 1980 .

[6]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[7]  J. Mandler,et al.  On the psychological validity of story structure , 1982 .

[8]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Short-term storage in reading. , 1984 .

[9]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Surface information loss in comprehension , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  W Hirst,et al.  On the representation of events: a study of orientation, recall, and recognition. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  M. Beeman,et al.  Building and Accessing Clausal Representations: The Advantage of First Mention versus the Advantage of Clause Recency. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.

[12]  S. Greenspan,et al.  Updating situation models during narrative comprehension , 1989 .

[13]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories , 1989 .

[14]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[15]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Inferences during Reading: Converging Evidence from Discourse Analysis, Talk-Aloud Protocols, and Recognition Priming , 1993 .

[16]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. , 1995 .

[17]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  The Construction of Situation Models in Narrative Comprehension: An Event-Indexing Model , 1995 .

[18]  P. Broek,et al.  The role of readers' standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. , 1995 .

[19]  Peter Afflerbach,et al.  Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading , 1996 .

[20]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Conscious understanding during comprehension , 1996 .

[21]  Rolf A. Zwaan.  Processing Narrative Time Shifts , 1996 .

[22]  G. Radvansky,et al.  The Fate of Completed Goal Information in Narrative Comprehension , 1997 .

[23]  G. Bower,et al.  The metrics of spatial situation models. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Two Decades of Structure Building. , 1997, Discourse processes.

[25]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Constructing Multidimensional Situation Models During Reading , 1998 .

[26]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  H. Oostendorp,et al.  The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading , 1998 .

[28]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The role of situational continuity in narrative understanding. , 1999 .

[29]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Modeling causal integration and availability of information during comprehension of narrative texts. , 1999 .

[30]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Strategic processing during comprehension. , 1999 .

[31]  Paul van den Broek,et al.  The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. , 1999 .

[32]  A. Baddeley.  The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  H. Taylor,et al.  Not all narrative shifts function equally , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[34]  G. Bower,et al.  Temporal and spatial distance in situation models , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Indexing space and time in film understanding , 2001 .

[37]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Assessing Reading Skill With a Think-Aloud Procedure and Latent Semantic Analysis , 2003 .

[40]  Mike Rinck,et al.  Who when where: An experimental test of the event-indexing model , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[41]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Updating situation models. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive representation of filmic event summaries , 2004 .

[43]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  Goal Plans of Action and Inferences During Comprehension of Narratives , 2005 .

[44]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Temporal changes as event boundaries: Processing and memory consequences of narrative time shifts , 2005 .

[45]  Darcia Narvaez,et al.  Inference Generation 1 RUNNING HEAD : READER GOAL AND INFERENCE GENERATION Reading purpose , type of text and their influence on think-alouds and comprehension measures , 2005 .

[46]  Johanna K. Kaakinen,et al.  Perspective Effects on Expository Text Comprehension: Evidence From Think-Aloud Protocols, Eyetracking, and Recall , 2005 .

[47]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 2005 .

[48]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Measuring Discourse-Level Processes With Verbal Protocols and Latent Semantic Analysis , 2006 .

[49]  Mike Rinck,et al.  Assessing the influence of dimensional focus during situation model construction , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[50]  Brenton Muñoz,et al.  Typing versus thinking aloud when reading: Implications for computer-based assessment and training tools , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[51]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Human Brain Activity Time-Locked to Narrative Event Boundaries , 2007, Psychological science.

[52]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event perception: a mind-brain perspective. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[53]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  A Computational Model of Event Segmentation From Perceptual Prediction , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[54]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[55]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[56]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Segmentation in the perception and memory of events , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Chapter 9 Toward a Comprehensive Model of Comprehension , 2009 .

[58]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[59]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[60]  Tilo Kircher,et al.  Neural correlates of narrative shifts during auditory story comprehension , 2009, NeuroImage.

[61]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Reading Stories Activates Neural Representations of Visual and Motor Experiences , 2009, Psychological science.

[62]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  The Brain's Cutting-Room Floor: Segmentation of Narrative Cinema , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[63]  Gabriel A Radvansky,et al.  Reading times and the detection of event shift processing. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[64]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Age differences in the perception of hierarchical structure in events , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[65]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Prediction Error Associated with the Perceptual Segmentation of Naturalistic Events , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[66]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Assessing comprehension during reading with the Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (RSAT) , 2011, Metacognition and learning.

[67]  Deanna M. Barch,et al.  Changes in Events Alter How People Remember Recent Information , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.