Modeling of one-dimensional smoldering of polyurethane in microgravity conditions

Abstract Results are presented from a model of forward smoldering combustion of polyurethane foam in microgravity. The transient one-dimensional numerical-model is based on that developed at the University of Texas at Austin. The conservation equations of energy, species, and mass in the porous solid and in the gas phases are numerically solved. The solid and the gas phases are not assumed to be in thermal or in chemical equilibrium. The chemical reactions modeled consist of foam oxidation and pyrolysis reactions, as well as char oxidation. The model has been modified to account for new polyurethane kinetics parameters and radial heat losses to the surrounding environment. The kinetics parameters are extracted from thermogravimetric analyses published in the literature and using Genetic Algorithms as the optimization technique. The model results are compared with previous tests of forward smoldering combustion in microgravity conducted aboard the NASA Space Shuttle. The model calculates well the propagation velocities and the overall smoldering characteristics. Direct comparison of the solution with the experimental temperature profiles shows that the model predicts well these profiles at high temperature, but not as well at lower temperatures. The effect of inlet gas velocity is examined, and the minimum airflow for ignition is identified. It is remarkable that this one-dimensional model with simplified kinetics is capable of predicting cases of smolder ignition but with no self-propagation away from the igniter region. The model is used for better understanding of the controlling mechanisms of smolder combustion for the purpose of fire safety, both in microgravity and normal gravity, and to extend the unique microgravity data to wider conditions avoiding the high cost of space-based experiments.

[1]  Angela Casu,et al.  Reaction kinetics and morphological changes of a rigid polyurethane foam during combustion , 2003 .

[2]  M. A. Decker,et al.  Dynamics of smoulder waves near extinction , 2004 .

[3]  David C. Walther,et al.  Space shuttle based microgravity smoldering combustion experiments , 1999 .

[4]  J Matthew,et al.  Star-Crossed Orbits: Inside the U.S.-Russian Space Alliance (review) , 2003 .

[5]  G. D. Byrne,et al.  VODE: a variable-coefficient ODE solver , 1989 .

[6]  T. J. Ohlemiller,et al.  A model of smoldering combustion applied to flexible polyurethane foams , 1979 .

[7]  T. Ohlemiller Modeling of smoldering combustion propagation , 1985 .

[8]  A. Bayliss,et al.  Two routes to chaos in condensed phase combustion , 1990 .

[9]  C. Chao,et al.  Comparison of the Thermal Decomposition Behavior of a Non-Fire Retarded and a Fire Retarded Flexible Polyurethane Foam with Phosphorus and Brominated Additives , 2001 .

[10]  C. Blasi Mechanisms of Two-Dimensional Smoldering Propagation Through Packed Fuel Beds , 1995 .

[11]  Robert Friedman,et al.  Risks and issues in fire safety on the Space Station , 1993 .

[12]  Ofodike A. Ezekoye,et al.  Kinetic and Fuel Property Effects on Forward Smoldering Combustion , 2000 .

[13]  Christopher R. Houck,et al.  A Genetic Algorithm for Function Optimization: A Matlab Implementation , 2001 .

[14]  Rafael Bilbao,et al.  Kinetics of the thermal decomposition of polyurethane foams in nitrogen and air atmospheres , 1996 .

[15]  Guillermo Rein,et al.  Forced forward smoldering experiments in microgravity , 2004 .

[16]  Jose L. Torero,et al.  Forward smolder of polyurethane foam in a forced air flow , 1996 .