EVALUATION OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES: USER SATISFACTION AND PERCEPTIONS ON THREE SHARED USE

This report describes research conducted to evaluate bicycle and pedestrian facilities (i.e., shared use trails) with user satisfaction and perception surveys. Public and community input on transportation projects is often mentioned as a necessary step in the planning process but seldom performed. The opinions and perceptions of facility users are immensely valuable in improving conditions at current trails as well as in the development and design of new trails. In this study, the research team developed on-site and mail-back survey instruments that were distributed on three shared use trails in Texas: the Brays and Buffalo Bayou Trails in Houston, and the Shoal Creek Trail in Austin. The responses to the surveys were analyzed to determine consistent themes and trends in user satisfaction and perceptions. The study found that several trail attributes contribute significantly to user satisfaction and higher levels of trail use. Adequate separation from motor vehicles was noted as a positive attribute that should be provided whenever possible on shared use trails. Trail surface quality and width was also noted as an important attribute, particularly in cases where numerous user types (e.g., bicyclists, joggers, walkers) were using the same trail. The study also revealed that many of the trail users felt that the shared use trails significantly contributed to harmonizing transportation and community goals. The survey responses indicated that the trails were used for a variety of purposes, including transportation, recreation, social interaction, and enjoyment of the natural environment. The researchers concluded that user surveys (such as those conducted in this study) are a valuable addition to other traditional transportation planning tools, and as such, can provide more and better insight into roadway and trail user behavior and motivation.

[1]  Paul H. Gobster,et al.  Perception and use of a metropolitan greenway system for recreation , 1995 .

[2]  Shawn Turner.  BICYCLE SUITABILITY CRITERIA FOR STATE ROADWAYS IN TEXAS. , 1997 .

[3]  Brian R. Little,et al.  Affective and cognitive components of global subjective well-being measures , 1985 .

[4]  Donald W. Reinfurt,et al.  THE BICYCLE COMPATIBILITY INDEX: A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPT, IMPLEMENTATION MANUAL , 1998 .

[5]  B W Landis,et al.  Bicycle System Performance Measures: the Interaction Hazard and Latent Demand Score Models , 1996 .

[6]  Larry Lyon,et al.  The quality of community and the quality of life , 1986 .

[7]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  BICYCLIST LINK EVALUATION: A STATED-PREFERENCE APPROACH , 1986 .

[8]  David Banister,et al.  ENERGY, QUALITY OF LIFE AND THE ENVIRONMENT: THE ROLE OF TRANSPORT , 1994 .

[9]  J. Eicher,et al.  A human ecological approach to quality of life: Conceptual framework and results of a preliminary study , 1980 .

[10]  Theodore H. Poister.  PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN STATE DEPARTMENTS OF TRANSPORTATION , 1997 .

[11]  Shawn Turner,et al.  Bicycle and pedestrian travel demand forecasting : summary of data collection activities , 1997 .

[12]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Modeling the psychological determinants of life quality , 1985 .

[13]  Terri Gullickson.  Social function in psychiatry: The hidden axis of classification. , 1995 .

[14]  J. Newbrough,et al.  Toward community: A third position , 1995 .

[15]  C. J. Khisty.  EVALUATION OF PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES: BEYOND THE LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPT , 1994 .

[16]  J. Crompton,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Role of Recreation, Parks and Open Space in Companies' (Re)Location Decisions , 1997 .

[17]  Stephen A. Ayidiya,et al.  Neighborhood Community and Life Satisfaction , 1991 .

[18]  Tom W. Smith.  A life events approach to developing an index of societal well-being☆ , 1992 .

[19]  G Shunk,et al.  BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING: LITERATURE REVIEW , 1997 .

[20]  Roger L. Moore.  CONFLICTS ON MULTIPLE-USE TRAILS: SYNTHESIS OF THE LITERATURE AND STATE OF THE PRACTICE , 1994 .

[21]  Joanne M. Westphal,et al.  Predicting the Effect of Alternative Trail Design on Visitor Satisfaction in Park Settings , 1986, Landscape Journal.