Real-world Experience of Carotid Artery Stenting in Japan: Analysis of 8458 Cases from the JR-NET3 Nationwide Retrospective Multi-center Registries

We aimed to clarify the outcomes of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the Japanese population. For this purpose, we reviewed data from the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 3 (JR-NET3), a retrospective, nation-wide, multi-center, observational study of neuroendovascular treatments in Japan. Of the 9207 patients who underwent CAS between January 2010 and December 2014, 8458 satisfied the inclusion criteria for our analysis. The outcome statistics of this JR-NET3 cohort were compared to those of JR-NET1 and 2 cohorts fitting the same inclusion criteria. Of the 8458 JR-NET3 patients analyzed, 8042 (95.1%) were treated by surgeons with board certification from the Japanese Society for NeuroEndovascular Therapy. Technical success was achieved in 8417 patients (99.5%), whereas 198 patients (2.3%) had clinically significant complications (CSCs). These findings mirrored those obtained for the JR-NET1 and 2 cohorts. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for CAS-associated CSC included symptomatic lesion [odds ratio (OR), 1.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23–3.00; P = 0.003] and hypoechoic lesion on carotid artery ultrasound (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.21–2.84; P = 0.005), whereas use of closed-cell stents was a predictor of better outcome (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35–0.79; P = 0.002). The findings of JR-NET3 reflect good outcomes of CAS, but non-modifiable risk factors reflecting lesion characteristics remain of concern. Using closed-cell stents is advisable. Technological advances such as the introduction of new materials may help further improve CAS outcomes in Japanese patients.

[1]  Paul E. Stanton,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy , 1995, Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke.

[2]  A. Kuehnl,et al.  Risk of Stroke or Death Is Associated With the Timing of Carotid Artery Stenting for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Secondary Data Analysis of the German Statutory Quality Assurance Database , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[3]  A. Algra,et al.  Early Endarterectomy Carries a Lower Procedural Risk Than Early Stenting in Patients With Symptomatic Stenosis of the Internal Carotid Artery: Results From 4 Randomized Controlled Trials , 2017, Stroke.

[4]  W. Gray,et al.  Randomized Trial of Stent versus Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  S. Yoshimura,et al.  Real-world Experience of Carotid Artery Stenting in Japan: Analysis of 7,134 Cases from JR-NET1 and 2 Nationwide Retrospective Multi-center Registries , 2013, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[6]  Dong Joon Kim,et al.  Incidence of embolism associated with carotid artery stenting: open-cell versus closed-cell stents. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  R. Bersin,et al.  A meta‐analysis of proximal occlusion device outcomes in carotid artery stenting , 2012, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[8]  G. Fraedrich,et al.  The risk of carotid artery stenting compared with carotid endarterectomy is greatest in patients treated within 7 days of symptoms. , 2012, Journal of vascular surgery.

[9]  J. Schofer,et al.  The PROFI study (Prevention of Cerebral Embolization by Proximal Balloon Occlusion Compared to Filter Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting): a prospective randomized trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  M. Kanematsu,et al.  High-Intensity Signal on Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography Indicates Carotid Plaques at High Risk for Cerebral Embolism During Stenting , 2011, Stroke.

[11]  D. Andreini,et al.  Microembolization during carotid artery stenting in patients with high-risk, lipid-rich plaque. A randomized trial of proximal versus distal cerebral protection. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Michael D Hill,et al.  Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  T. Taoka,et al.  Magnetic resonance plaque imaging to predict the occurrence of the slow-flow phenomenon in carotid artery stenting procedures , 2010, Neuroradiology.

[14]  Stenting Study,et al.  Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[15]  M. Hartmann,et al.  Protection or Nonprotection in Carotid Stent Angioplasty: The Influence of Interventional Techniques on Outcome Data From the SPACE Trial , 2009, Stroke.

[16]  Johannes Trenkler,et al.  Does Carotid Stent Cell Design Matter? , 2008, Stroke.

[17]  A Cremonesi,et al.  Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[18]  Xavier Ducrocq,et al.  Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  W. Hacke,et al.  30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[20]  J. Hart,et al.  Do device characteristics impact outcome in carotid artery stenting? , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[21]  P. Faries,et al.  Cerebral ischemia associated with PercuSurge balloon occlusion balloon during carotid stenting: Incidence and possible mechanisms. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  T. Bajwa,et al.  Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  M. Eliasziw,et al.  Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery , 2004, The Lancet.

[24]  M. Amor,et al.  Retinal embolization during carotid angioplasty and stenting: Mechanisms and role of cerebral protection systems , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[25]  S S Iyer,et al.  Effect of the Distal-Balloon Protection System on Microembolization During Carotid Stenting , 2001, Circulation.

[26]  L. Murri,et al.  Characteristics of cerebral microembolism during carotid stenting and angioplasty alone. , 2001, Archives of neurology.

[27]  D. Rüfenacht,et al.  Role of the Distal Balloon Protection Technique in the Prevention of Cerebral Embolic Events During Carotid Stent Placement , 2001, Stroke.

[28]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  G. Howard,et al.  Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999‐2014 , 2018 .

[30]  I. Nakagawa,et al.  Initial experience of using the filter protection device during carotid artery stenting in Japan , 2008, Radiation Medicine.