Topographic migration of 2D and 3D ground-penetrating radar data considering variable velocities

We present a 2D/3D topographic migration scheme for ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data which is able to account for variable velocities by using the root mean square (rms) velocity approximation. We test our migration scheme using a synthetic 2D example and compare our migrated image to the results obtained using common GPR migration approaches. Furthermore, we apply it to 2D and 3D field data. These examples are recorded across common subsurface settings including surface topography and variations in the GPR subsurface velocity field caused by a shallow ground water table. In such field settings, our migration strategy provides well focused images of commonoffset GPR data without the need for a detailed interval velocity model. The synthetic and field examples demonstrate that our topographic migration scheme allows for accurate GPR imaging in the presence of variations in surface topography and subsurface velocity.

[2]  M. Al-Chalabi,et al.  SERIES APPROXIMATION IN VELOCITY AND TRAVELTIME COMPUTATIONS , 1973 .

[3]  William A. Schneider,et al.  INTEGRAL FORMULATION FOR MIGRATION IN TWO AND THREE DIMENSIONS , 1978 .

[4]  C. H. Dix.  SEISMIC VELOCITIES FROM SURFACE MEASUREMENTS , 1955 .

[5]  Oz Yilmaz,et al.  Migration velocity analysis by wave-field extrapolation , 1984 .

[6]  Etienne Robein,et al.  e-book: Velocities, Time-imaging and Depth-imaging: Principles and Methods , 2003 .

[7]  U. Böniger,et al.  Integrated data analysis at an archaeological site: A case study using 3D GPR, magnetic, and high-resolution topographic data , 2010 .

[8]  M. Turhan Taner,et al.  Velocity spectra-digital computer derivation and applications of velocity functions , 1969 .

[9]  Jens Tronicke,et al.  Joint application of surface electrical resistivity- and GPR-measurements for groundwater exploration on the island of Spiekeroog—northern Germany , 1999 .

[10]  Harry M. Jol,et al.  Ground penetrating radar : theory and applications , 2009 .

[11]  Alan G. Green,et al.  Acquisition and processing strategies for 3D georadar surveying a region characterized by rugged topography , 2005 .

[12]  R. J. Castle,et al.  A theory of normal moveout , 1994 .

[13]  Pilar Villamor,et al.  Detailed shallow geometry and vertical displacement estimates of the Maleme Fault Zone, New Zealand, using 2D and 3D georadar , 2006 .

[14]  A. P. Annan.  11. Ground-Penetrating Radar , 2005 .

[15]  J. W. Wiggins.  Kirchhoff integral extrapolation and migration of nonplanar data , 1984 .

[16]  J. Tronicke,et al.  Global inversion of GPR traveltimes to assess uncertainties in CMP velocity models , 2014 .

[17]  D. Daniels.  Ground Penetrating Radar , 2005 .

[18]  Harry M. Jol,et al.  Ground Penetrating Radar in Sediments , 2003 .

[19]  José M. Carcione,et al.  On the acoustic-electromagnetic analogy , 1995 .

[20]  Alan G. Green,et al.  Topographic migration of georadar data: Implications for acquisition and processing , 2000 .

[21]  Jens Tronicke,et al.  On the Potential of Kinematic GPR Surveying Using a Self-Tracking Total Station: Evaluating System Crosstalk and Latency , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.