An Indirect Simulation-Optimization Model for Determining Optimal TMDL Allocation under Uncertainty

An indirect simulation-optimization model framework with enhanced computational efficiency and risk-based decision-making capability was developed to determine optimal total maximum daily load (TMDL) allocation under uncertainty. To convert the traditional direct simulation-optimization model into our indirect equivalent model framework, we proposed a two-step strategy: (1) application of interval regression equations derived by a Bayesian recursive regression tree (BRRT v2) algorithm, which approximates the original hydrodynamic and water-quality simulation models and accurately quantifies the inherent nonlinear relationship between nutrient load reductions and the credible interval of algal biomass with a given confidence interval; and (2) incorporation of the calibrated interval regression equations into an uncertain optimization framework, which is further converted to our indirect equivalent framework by the enhanced-interval linear programming (EILP) method and provides approximate-optimal solutions at various risk levels. The proposed strategy was applied to the Swift Creek Reservoir’s nutrient TMDL allocation (Chesterfield County, VA) to identify the minimum nutrient load allocations required from eight sub-watersheds to ensure compliance with user-specified chlorophyll criteria. Our results indicated that the BRRT-EILP model could identify critical sub-watersheds faster than the traditional one and requires lower reduction of nutrient loadings compared to traditional stochastic simulation and trial-and-error (TAE) approaches. This suggests that our proposed framework performs better in optimal TMDL development compared to the traditional simulation-optimization models and provides extreme and non-extreme tradeoff analysis under uncertainty for risk-based decision making.

[1]  Yong Liu,et al.  A nonlinearity interval mapping scheme for efficient waste load allocation simulation‐optimization analysis , 2010 .

[2]  Gordon H. Huang,et al.  Enhanced-interval linear programming , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  CUMULATIVE UNCERTAINTY IN MEASURED STREAMFLOW AND WATER QUALITY DATA FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS , 2006 .

[4]  K. Beven,et al.  Nonparametric direct mapping of rainfall‐runoff relationships: An alternative approach to data analysis and modeling? , 2004 .

[5]  Guohe Huang,et al.  Development of a forecasting system for supporting remediation design and process control based on NAPL‐biodegradation simulation and stepwise‐cluster analysis , 2006 .

[6]  R. Wetzel Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems , 1975 .

[7]  Feng Zhou,et al.  A well‐balanced stable generalized Riemann problem scheme for shallow water equations using adaptive moving unstructured triangular meshes , 2013 .

[8]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Spatio-temporal patterns and source apportionment of coastal water pollution in eastern Hong Kong. , 2007, Water research.

[9]  R. Zou,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis for Coupled Watershed and Water Quality Modeling Systems , 2006 .

[10]  H W Lu,et al.  Health-risk-based groundwater remediation system optimization through clusterwise linear regression. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Li He,et al.  An integrated simulation, inference, and optimization method for identifying groundwater remediation strategies at petroleum-contaminated aquifers in western Canada. , 2008, Water research.

[12]  Guohe Huang,et al.  A stepwise cluster analysis method for predicting air quality in an urban environment , 1992 .

[13]  Edward I. George,et al.  Bayesian Treed Models , 2002, Machine Learning.

[14]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  New model for capturing the variations of fertilizer‐induced emission factors of N2O , 2015 .

[15]  Guohe Huang,et al.  The Interval Linear Programming: A Revisit , 2008 .

[16]  Wei Gao,et al.  Three-level trade-off analysis for decision making in environmental engineering under interval uncertainty , 2014 .

[17]  Feng Zhou,et al.  An adaptive moving finite volume scheme for modeling flood inundation over dry and complex topography , 2013 .

[18]  Guohe Huang,et al.  A Stepwise-Inference-Based Optimization System for Supporting Remediation of Petroleum-Contaminated Sites , 2007 .

[19]  H. Paerl,et al.  Controlling Eutrophication: Nitrogen and Phosphorus , 2009, Science.

[20]  Motahareh Saadatpour,et al.  Waste load allocation modeling with fuzzy goals; simulation-optimization approach , 2007 .

[21]  Scott A. Wells,et al.  CE-QUAL-W2: A Two-dimensional, Laterally Averaged, Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model, Version 3.5 , 2006 .

[22]  D. Boesch,et al.  The Gulf of Mexico's Dead Zone , 2004, Science.

[23]  Carl F. Cerco,et al.  Three-dimensional Management Model for Lake Washington, Part II: Eutrophication Modeling and Skill Assessment , 2006 .

[24]  Antonio Alonso Ayuso,et al.  Introduction to Stochastic Programming , 2009 .

[25]  Rui Zou,et al.  An adaptive neural network embedded genetic algorithm approach for inverse water quality modeling , 2007 .

[26]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Towards global empirical upscaling of FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: validation of a model tree ensemble approach using a biosphere model , 2009 .

[27]  Madan K. Jha,et al.  Simulation-Optimization Modelling for Sustainable Groundwater Management in a Coastal Basin of Orissa, India , 2009 .

[28]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[29]  Bithin Datta,et al.  Optimal operation of reservoirs for downstream water quality control using linked simulation optimization , 2008 .

[30]  Teresa B. Culver,et al.  Robust optimization for total maximum daily load allocations , 2006 .

[31]  Nikolaos V. Sahinidis,et al.  Optimization under uncertainty: state-of-the-art and opportunities , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..