Risk Assessment and Risk Minimization in Nanomedicine: A Need for Predictive, Alternative, and 3Rs Strategies

The use of nanomaterials in medicine has grown very rapidly, leading to a concern about possible health risks. Surely, the application of nanotechnology in medicine has many significant potentialities as it can improve human health in at least three different ways: by contributing to early disease diagnosis, improved treatment outcomes and containment of health care costs. However, toxicology or safety assessment is an integral part of any new medical technology and the nanotechnologies are no exception. The principle aim of nanosafety studies in this frame is to enable safer design of nanomedicines. The most urgent need is finding and validating novel approaches able to extrapolate acute in vitro results for the prediction of chronic in vivo effects and to this purpose a few European initiatives have been launched. While a “safe-by-design” process may be considered as utopic, “safer-by-design” is probably a reachable goal in the field of nanomedicine.

[1]  Igor Linkov,et al.  A weight of evidence approach for hazard screening of engineered nanomaterials , 2014, Nanotoxicology.

[2]  C. Grady,et al.  What makes clinical research ethical? , 2000, JAMA.

[3]  K. Stockdale,et al.  Ethics in the OR , 1993 .

[4]  Peter Kearns,et al.  Physico-chemical properties of manufactured nanomaterials - Characterisation and relevant methods. An outlook based on the OECD Testing Programme , 2018, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[5]  A Worth,et al.  Towards an alternative testing strategy for nanomaterials used in nanomedicine: Lessons from NanoTEST , 2015, Nanotoxicology.

[6]  Jeremy C Simpson,et al.  High-content analysis for drug delivery and nanoparticle applications. , 2015, Drug discovery today.

[7]  Daniel L Villeneuve,et al.  Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[8]  Claudia Giachino,et al.  Stem Cell Tracking with Nanoparticles for Regenerative Medicine Purposes: An Overview , 2015, Stem cells international.

[9]  Sonja Boland,et al.  Toxicity evaluation of engineered nanoparticles for medical applications using pulmonary epithelial cells , 2015, Nanotoxicology.

[10]  Susan Wijnhoven,et al.  Risk assessment frameworks for nanomaterials: Scope, link to regulations, applicability, and outline for future directions in view of needed increase in efficiency , 2018 .

[11]  Nancy M. P. King,et al.  Nanomedicine First-in-Human Research: Challenges for Informed Consent , 2012, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[12]  Lang Tran,et al.  ITS-NANO - Prioritising nanosafety research to develop a stakeholder driven intelligent testing strategy , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[13]  Fritz Allhoff,et al.  The Coming Era of Nanomedicine , 2009, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[14]  Xiang Wang,et al.  Nanomaterial toxicity testing in the 21st century: use of a predictive toxicological approach and high-throughput screening. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[15]  J A Shatkin,et al.  Alternative Testing Strategies for Nanomaterials: State of the Science and Considerations for Risk Analysis , 2016, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  Guangchao Chen,et al.  Current Knowledge on the Use of Computational Toxicology in Hazard Assessment of Metallic Engineered Nanomaterials , 2017, International journal of molecular sciences.

[17]  Michael Riediker,et al.  Therapeutic nanoparticles in clinics and under clinical evaluation. , 2013, Nanomedicine.

[18]  Lutz Mädler,et al.  Use of metal oxide nanoparticle band gap to develop a predictive paradigm for oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation. , 2012, ACS nano.

[19]  D. Golde The stem cell. , 1991, Scientific American.

[20]  David A Winkler,et al.  Recent advances, and unresolved issues, in the application of computational modelling to the prediction of the biological effects of nanomaterials. , 2016, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[21]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  Biological impact assessment of nanomaterial used in nanomedicine. Introduction to the NanoTEST project , 2015, Nanotoxicology.

[22]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Inflammatory findings on species extrapolations: humans are definitely no 70-kg mice , 2013, Archives of Toxicology.

[23]  T. Hartung Toxicology for the twenty-first century , 2009, Nature.

[24]  J. Lovrić,et al.  Nanotherapeutics in the EU: an overview on current state and future directions , 2014, International journal of nanomedicine.

[25]  Eleonore Fröhlich,et al.  Role of omics techniques in the toxicity testing of nanoparticles , 2017, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.

[26]  Bryant C Nelson,et al.  Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology. , 2017, Mutagenesis.

[27]  Linda F. Hogle,et al.  Concepts of Risk in Nanomedicine Research , 2012, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[28]  Emil Cimpan,et al.  An impedance-based high-throughput method for evaluating the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles , 2013 .

[29]  David B Resnik,et al.  Ethics in nanomedicine. , 2007, Nanomedicine.

[30]  A E Nel,et al.  Implementation of alternative test strategies for the safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials , 2013, Journal of internal medicine.

[31]  M Ferrari,et al.  Nanomedicine and Society , 2009, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[32]  Volker Wagner,et al.  The emerging nanomedicine landscape , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[33]  David M. Shaw,et al.  Defining Nano, Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine: Why Should It Matter? , 2016, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[34]  I. Kola,et al.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[35]  Alex John London,et al.  Predicting Harms and Benefits in Translational Trials: Ethics, Evidence, and Uncertainty , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[36]  Gerald T. Ankley,et al.  Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment: Adverse outcome pathways in ecological risk assessment , 2011 .

[37]  Hugh J. Byrne,et al.  Concern-driven integrated approaches to nanomaterial testing and assessment – report of the NanoSafety Cluster Working Group 10 , 2013, Nanotoxicology.

[38]  Sebastian Hoffmann,et al.  Integrated Testing Strategy (ITS) - Opportunities to better use existing data and guide future testing in toxicology. , 2010, ALTEX.

[39]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  Immunotoxicity, genotoxicity and epigenetic toxicity of nanomaterials: New strategies for toxicity testing? , 2017, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[40]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  Dose-dependent transitions in mechanisms of toxicity. , 2004, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[41]  Qasim Chaudhry,et al.  Aligning nanotoxicology with the 3Rs: What is needed to realise the short, medium and long-term opportunities? , 2017, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[42]  R. Duncan,et al.  Nanomedicine(s) under the microscope. , 2011, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[43]  Jo Anne Shatkin,et al.  A multi-stakeholder perspective on the use of alternative test strategies for nanomaterial safety assessment. , 2013, ACS nano.

[44]  Gurumurthy Ramachandran,et al.  Handling Worker and Third-Party Exposures to Nanotherapeutics during Clinical Trials , 2012, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[45]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Safety assessment for nanotechnology and nanomedicine: concepts of nanotoxicology , 2010, Journal of internal medicine.

[46]  Arthur G Erdman,et al.  The big picture on nanomedicine: the state of investigational and approved nanomedicine products. , 2013, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.