Evaluation of Malaria Diagnoses Using a Handheld Light Microscope in a Community-Based Setting in Rural Côte d'Ivoire.

Portable microscopy may facilitate quality diagnostic care in resource-constrained settings. We compared a handheld light microscope (Newton Nm1) with a mobile phone attachment to conventional light microscopy for the detection of Plasmodium falciparum in a cross-sectional study in rural Côte d'Ivoire. Single Giemsa-stained thick blood film from 223 individuals were prepared and read by local laboratory technicians on both microscopes under 1,000× magnification with oil. Of the 223 samples, 162 (72.6%) were P. falciparum positive, and the overall mean parasite count was 1,392/μL of blood. Sensitivity and specificity of the handheld microscope was 80.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.1-85.9%) and 100.0% (95% CI: 92.6-100.0%), respectively, with a positive and negative predictive value of 100.0% (95% CI: 96.4-100.0%) and 65.6% (95% CI: 54.9-74.9%), respectively. If sensitivity can be improved, handheld light microscopy may become a valuable public health tool for P. falciparum diagnosis.

[1]  The reliability of the microscopic diagnosis of malaria in the field and in the laboratory. , 1983, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[2]  M Longmore.  Community laboratory work and hand held microscopes. , 1986, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[3]  I. Bates,et al.  Evaluation of microscope condition in Malawi. , 2000, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[4]  I. Bates,et al.  Improving the accuracy of malaria-related laboratory tests in Ghana , 2004, Malaria Journal.

[5]  J. Webster,et al.  Field evaluation of the Meade Readiview handheld microscope for diagnosis of intestinal schistosomiasis in Ugandan school children. , 2005, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[6]  Cathy A Petti,et al.  Laboratory medicine in Africa: a barrier to effective health care. , 2006, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[7]  J. Barnwell,et al.  Ensuring quality and access for malaria diagnosis: how can it be achieved? , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[8]  J. Barnwell,et al.  Ensuring quality and access for malaria diagnosis: how can it be achieved? , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[9]  J. Mouatcho,et al.  Malaria rapid diagnostic tests: challenges and prospects. , 2013, Journal of medical microbiology.

[10]  Benjamin Speich,et al.  Mobile phone microscopy for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminth infections: a proof-of-concept study. , 2013, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[11]  Who Malaria Policy Advisory Committee and Secretariat.  Malaria Policy Advisory Committee to the WHO: conclusions and recommendations of September 2013 meeting , 2013, Malaria Journal.

[12]  I. Bogoch,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of a handheld light microscope for field diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminth infection. , 2014, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[13]  I. Bogoch,et al.  Evaluation of portable microscopic devices for the diagnosis of Schistosoma and soil-transmitted helminth infection , 2014, Parasitology.

[14]  N. Kabatereine,et al.  Towards malaria microscopy at the point-of-contact: an assessment of the diagnostic performance of the Newton Nm1 microscope in Uganda , 2014, Parasitology.

[15]  Evans Duah,et al.  Diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium infection with a mobile phone-mounted Foldscope and a reversed-lens CellScope in Ghana. , 2015, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[16]  Daniel A. Fletcher,et al.  Point-of-care quantification of blood-borne filarial parasites with a mobile phone microscope , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[17]  Steve Feng,et al.  Rapid imaging, detection and quantification of Giardia lamblia cysts using mobile-phone based fluorescent microscopy and machine learning. , 2015, Lab on a chip.