Detection of compound mode of action by computational integration of whole-genome measurements and genetic perturbations

BackgroundA key problem of drug development is to decide which compounds to evaluate further in expensive clinical trials (Phase I- III). This decision is primarily based on the primary targets and mechanisms of action of the chemical compounds under consideration. Whole-genome expression measurements have shown to be useful for this process but current approaches suffer from requiring either a large number of mutant experiments or a detailed understanding of the regulatory networks.ResultsWe have designed an algorithm, CutTree that when applied to whole-genome expression datasets identifies the primary affected genes (PAGs) of a chemical compound by separating them from downstream, indirectly affected genes. Unlike previous methods requiring whole-genome deletion libraries or a complete map of gene network architecture, CutTree identifies PAGs from a limited set of experimental perturbations without requiring any prior information about the underlying pathways. The principle for CutTree is to iteratively filter out PAGs from other recurrently active genes (RAGs) that are not PAGs. The in silico validation predicted that CutTree should be able to identify 3–4 out of 5 known PAGs (~70%). In accordance, when we applied CutTree to whole-genome expression profiles from 17 genetic perturbations in the presence of galactose in Yeast, CutTree identified four out of five known primary galactose targets (80%). Using an exhaustive search strategy to detect these PAGs would not have been feasible (>1012 combinations).ConclusionIn combination with genetic perturbation techniques like short interfering RNA (siRNA) followed by whole-genome expression measurements, CutTree sets the stage for compound target identification in less well-characterized but more disease-relevant mammalian cell systems.

[1]  M. Johnston A model fungal gene regulatory mechanism: the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1987, Microbiological reviews.

[2]  Jonathan Knowles,et al.  A guide to drug discovery: Target selection in drug discovery , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[3]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Estimating coarse gene network structure from large-scale gene perturbation data. , 2002, Genome research.

[5]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Chemogenomic profiling: identifying the functional interactions of small molecules in yeast. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Jesper Tegnér,et al.  Reverse engineering gene networks using singular value decomposition and robust regression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  T. Owa [Drug target validation and identification of secondary drug target effects using DNA microarrays]. , 2007, Tanpakushitsu kakusan koso. Protein, nucleic acid, enzyme.

[8]  D. Lohr,et al.  Transcriptional regulation in the yeast GAL gene family: a complex genetic network , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[9]  C. Ball,et al.  Saccharomyces Genome Database. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[10]  J. Hasty,et al.  Reverse engineering gene networks: Integrating genetic perturbations with dynamical modeling , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Functional Discovery via a Compendium of Expression Profiles , 2000, Cell.

[12]  R. J. Reece,et al.  The insertion of two amino acids into a transcriptional inducer converts it into a galactokinase. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J. C. Hinshaw,et al.  Discovering Modes of Action for Therapeutic Compounds Using a Genome-Wide Screen of Yeast Heterozygotes , 2004, Cell.

[14]  Vivek Mittal,et al.  Improving the efficiency of RNA interference in mammals , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[15]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[16]  Gustavo Stolovitzky,et al.  Reconstructing biological networks using conditional correlation analysis , 2005, Bioinform..

[17]  P. Brown,et al.  Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. , 1997, Science.

[18]  J. Collins,et al.  Chemogenomic profiling on a genome-wide scale using reverse-engineered gene networks , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  J. Collins,et al.  Inferring Genetic Networks and Identifying Compound Mode of Action via Expression Profiling , 2003, Science.

[20]  I. Kola,et al.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[21]  W. Bandlow,et al.  Permanent Nucleosome Exclusion from the Gal4p-inducible YeastGCY1 Promoter* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[23]  Roger E Bumgarner,et al.  Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. , 2001, Science.

[24]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes , 2004, Nature.

[25]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Science.