Performance Evaluation of PETbox: A Low Cost Bench Top Preclinical PET Scanner

PurposePETbox is a low cost bench top preclinical PET scanner dedicated to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mouse studies. A prototype system was developed at our institute, and this manuscript characterizes the performance of the prototype system.ProceduresThe PETbox detector consists of a 20 × 44 bismuth germanate crystal array with a thickness of 5 mm and cross-section size of 2.05 × 2.05 mm. Two such detectors are placed facing each other at a spacing of 5 cm, forming a dual-head geometry optimized for imaging mice. The detectors are kept stationary during the scan, making PETbox a limited angle tomography system. 3D images are reconstructed using a maximum likelihood and expectation maximization (ML–EM) method. The performance of the prototype system was characterized based on a modified set of the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards.ResultsIn-plane image spatial resolution was measured to be an average of 1.53 mm full width at half maximum for coronal images and 2.65 mm for the anterior–posterior direction. The volumetric reconstructed resolution was below 8 mm3 at most locations in the field of view (FOV). The sensitivity, scatter fraction, and noise equivalent count rate (NECR) were measured for different energy windows. With an energy window of 150 - 650 keV and a timing window of 20 ns optimized for mouse imaging, the peak absolute sensitivity was 3.99% at the center of FOV and a peak NECR of 20 kcps was achieved for a total activity of 3.2 MBq (86.8 μCi). Phantom and in vivo imaging studies were performed and demonstrated the utility of the system at low activity levels. The quantitation capabilities of the system were also characterized showing that despite the limited angle tomography, reasonably good quantification accuracy was achieved over a large dynamic range of activity levels.ConclusionsThe presented results demonstrate the potential of this new tomograph for small animal imaging.

[1]  Andrew J Reader,et al.  Performance evaluation of the 32-module quadHIDAC small-animal PET scanner. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Chin-Tu Chen,et al.  A High-Sensitivity Small-Animal PET Scanner: Development and Initial Performance Measurements , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  S. Siegel,et al.  Performance evaluation of the microPET focus: a third-generation microPET scanner dedicated to animal imaging. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  T J Spinks,et al.  The design and physical characteristics of a small animal positron emission tomograph. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  C J Thompson,et al.  Positron emission mammographic instrument: initial results. , 2000, Radiology.

[6]  S. Gambhir Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[7]  R W Silverman,et al.  Performance Characteristics of BGO Detectors for a Low Cost Preclinical PET Scanner , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  Tom K Lewellen,et al.  Recent developments in PET detector technology , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  M. Schmand,et al.  Design of a small animal PET imaging system with 1 microliter volume resolution , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[10]  Arion F. Chatziioannou,et al.  Video image based attenuation correction for PETbox, a preclinical PET tomograph , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[11]  Hongdi Li,et al.  The Engineering and Initial Results of a Transformable Low-cost High-Resolution PET Camera , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[12]  Patrick L Chow,et al.  A method of image registration for small animal, multi-modality imaging , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  High-throughput in vivo screening of targeted molecular imaging agents , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  A. Del Guerra,et al.  YAP-PET: first results of a small animal positron emission tomograph based on YAP:Ce finger crystals , 1998 .

[15]  Qinan Bao,et al.  GATE Simulation of a BGO Based High Sensitivity Small Animal PET Scanner , 2007, 2007 Joint Meeting of the 6th International Symposium on Noninvasive Functional Source Imaging of the Brain and Heart and the International Conference on Functional Biomedical Imaging.

[16]  Qinan Bao,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Inveon Dedicated PET Preclinical Tomograph Based on the NEMA NU-4 Standards , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Jurgen Seidel,et al.  Resolution uniformity and sensitivity of the NIH ATLAS small animal PET scanner: comparison to simulated LSO scanners without depth-of-interaction capability , 2001 .

[18]  R. N. Goble,et al.  Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  J.A. Correia,et al.  Performance evaluation of MMP-II:A second-generation small animal PET , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  Arion F Chatziioannou,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of absorbed dose in a mouse phantom from 18-fluorine compounds. , 2007, Medical physics.

[21]  S. Cherry,et al.  High-resolution PET detector design: modelling components of intrinsic spatial resolution , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Jurgen Seidel,et al.  Performance evaluation of the GE healthcare eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Andrew L Goertzen,et al.  Imaging of Weak-Source Distributions in LSO-Based Small-Animal PET Scanners , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  S. Cherry,et al.  Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Performance evaluation of the LabPET™ APD-based digital PET scanner , 2009, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[26]  E. Anashkin,et al.  Performance Evaluation of a PEM Scanner Using the NEMA NU 4—2008 Small Animal PET Standards , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[27]  Markus Cremer,et al.  Evaluation of the TierPET system , 1998 .

[28]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  Development of a Single Detector Ring Micro Crystal Element Scanner: QuickPET II , 2005, Molecular imaging.

[29]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  The ClearPET™ project: development of a 2nd generation high-performance small animal PET scanner , 2005 .

[30]  Alessandra Boschi,et al.  YAP-(S)PET small animal scanner: Quantitative results , 2003 .

[31]  R. Leahy,et al.  Optimization and performance evaluation of the microPET II scanner for in vivo small-animal imaging , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Marc C. Huisman,et al.  Performance evaluation of the Philips MOSAIC small animal PET scanner , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[33]  Yuan-Chuan Tai,et al.  Instrumentation aspects of animal PET. , 2005, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[34]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Molecular imaging of lymphoid organs and immune activation using positron emission tomography with a new 18F-labeled 2′-deoxycytidine analog , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[35]  A. P. Jeavons,et al.  A 3D HIDAC-PET camera with sub-millimetre resolution for imaging small animals , 1998 .

[36]  Hongdi Li,et al.  The Engineering and Initial Results of a Transformable Low-cost Ultra-high Resolution PET Camera , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[37]  K. Murthy,et al.  "ANIPET" a versatile PET scanner for imaging small animals , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[38]  Arion F. Chatziioannou,et al.  Image reconstruction for PETbox, a benchtop preclinical PET tomograph , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[39]  Q. Bao,et al.  Performance evaluation of PETbox: A low cost bench top PET scanner dedicated to high throughput preclinical imaging , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[40]  James F. Young,et al.  MicroPET: a high resolution PET scanner for imaging small animals , 1996, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[41]  S. Larson,et al.  Imaging transgene expression with radionuclide imaging technologies. , 2000, Neoplasia.

[42]  Sanjiv S. Gambhir,et al.  Small Animal Imaging Center Design: The Facility at the UCLA Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging , 2005, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[43]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Design evaluation of A-PET: A high sensitivity animal PET camera , 2003 .

[44]  S. Cherry,et al.  MicroPET II: design, development and initial performance of an improved microPET scanner for small-animal imaging. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[45]  George Sgouros,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of (86)Y-Trastuzumab for (90)Y dosimetry in an ovarian carcinoma model: correlative MicroPET and MRI. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Clinical Imaging Characteristics of the Positron Emission Mammography Camera: PEM Flex Solo II , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[47]  B. Hasegawa,et al.  Radiation dose estimate in small animal SPECT and PET. , 2004, Medical physics.

[48]  J. Seidel,et al.  Initial results from a PET/planar small animal imaging system , 1998 .

[49]  A Rodríguez-Ruano,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of a coplanar multimodality scanner for rodent imaging. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[50]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[51]  M E Phelps,et al.  Positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  Bin He,et al.  Comparison of conventional, model-based quantitative planar, and quantitative SPECT image processing methods for organ activity estimation using In-111 agents , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[53]  D Malakoff,et al.  The Rise of the Mouse, Biomedicine's Model Mammal , 2000, Science.

[54]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  Fundamental limits of positron emission mammography , 2003 .

[55]  Roger Lecomte,et al.  Initial results from the Sherbrooke avalanche photodiode positron tomograph , 1996 .

[56]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  PET imaging of somatostatin receptors: design, synthesis and preclinical evaluation of a novel 18F-labelled, carbohydrated analogue of octreotide , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.