Environmental Performance Index at the Provincial Level for China 2006–2011

Abstract In recent years, China has experienced rapid economic development and thousands of people escaped from poverty. However, this high-speed development has also led to increased pressure on the environment. Although the Chinese government has focused on solving environmental problems for the past few decades, it appears to have had little effect. Environmental performance evaluation (EPE) is a quantifiable environmental management tool that can evaluate environmental protection effects and provide guidance to improve government efficiency. We use EPE to evaluate China’s environmental performance at the provincial level between 2006 and 2011. In this study, the theme framework and driver force-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) framework models are used to build the composite index (CI) for environmental performance. This index includes 39 indicators in four categories that were selected based on data that can be acquired from China’s Statistical Bureau. The results indicate that the environmental performance index (EPI) of 30 provincial administrative regions (PARs) from 2006 to 2011 ranges from 44.12 (Shanxi, 2006) to 80.87 (Beijing, 2010), from poor to good, respectively. To help develop more effective policies to improve China’s regional environmental performance, cluster analysis (CLA) is applied to divide the 30 PARs into 3 sub-regions. Recommendations for improving the environmental performance of different sub-regions are made to help guide the Chinese government to adjust environmental governance approaches to local conditions.

[1]  Rotchanatch Darnsawasdi,et al.  Performance evaluation of lake basin water governance using composite index , 2016 .

[2]  A. Sagar,et al.  The human development index: a critical review , 1998 .

[3]  Michael Freudenberg,et al.  Composite Indicators of Country Performance: A Critical Assessment , 2003 .

[4]  Jeff Kuo,et al.  Review of PSR framework and development of a DPSIR model to assess greenhouse effect in Taiwan , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[5]  Li Qun Study on Regional Environmental Performance Based on Non-Radial DEA Model , 2009 .

[6]  Ravi Kanbur,et al.  China’s Regional Disparities: Experience and Policy , 2011 .

[7]  Kuangnan Fang,et al.  Evaluation of regional environmental efficiencies in China based on super-efficiency-DEA , 2015 .

[8]  C. Jasch Environmental performance evaluation and indicators , 2000 .

[9]  Melissa J. Dobbie,et al.  Robustness and sensitivity of weighting and aggregation in constructing composite indices , 2013 .

[10]  Rudolf de Groot,et al.  A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets , 2008 .

[11]  J. Bouma,et al.  Environmental impacts of innovative dairy farming systems aiming at improved internal nutrient cycling: A multi-scale assessment. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  M. Kortelainen,et al.  Dynamic environmental performance analysis: A Malmquist index approach , 2008 .

[13]  Jin-Nan Wang,et al.  China tackles the health effects of air pollution , 2013, The Lancet.

[14]  Weihua Zeng,et al.  Regional environmental efficiency in China: Analysis based on a regional slack-based measure with environmental undesirable outputs , 2016 .

[15]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA window analysis for environmental assessment in a dynamic time shift: Performance assessment of U.S. coal-fired power plants , 2013 .

[16]  Weiqian Zhang,et al.  Environmental performance evaluation of implementing EMS (ISO 14001) in the coating industry: case study of a Shanghai coating firm , 2014 .

[17]  M. Santamouris,et al.  Investigating and analysing the energy and environmental performance of an experimental green roof system installed in a nursery school building in Athens, Greece , 2007 .

[18]  Zhen Liu,et al.  Regional Environmental Performance Evaluation: A Case of Western Regions in China , 2012 .

[19]  O. Myhre,et al.  Development of environmental performance indicators supported by an environmental information system: Application to the Norwegian defence sector , 2013 .

[20]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  Have Chinese cities achieved the win–win between environmental protection and economic development? From the perspective of environmental efficiency , 2015 .

[21]  Alex S. Mayer,et al.  Classification of watersheds into integrated social and biophysical indicators with clustering analysis , 2014 .

[22]  Chris P. Nielsen,et al.  Clearing the Air: The Health and Economic Damages of Air Pollution in China , 2009 .

[23]  中華人民共和国国家統計局 China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[24]  Malin Song,et al.  Evaluation of environmental efficiency in China using data envelopment analysis , 2015 .

[25]  Hua Zheng,et al.  [Assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability of Hainan Island, China]. , 2009, Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology.

[26]  Sara González-García,et al.  Environmental performance assessment of hardboard manufacture , 2009 .