Some False Starts in the Construction of a Research Methodology for Artificial Life

This article briefly reviews some guidelines for building a r esearch methodology in Artificial Life given by Miller (Miller, 1995). A formal argument is presented to p int at some problems arising from the systematic application of these guidelines given the curre nt state of affairs in Theoretical Biology, and some practical arguments are proposed against the downsizi ng trategy adopted by Miller.

[1]  P. Bak,et al.  Complexity, contingency, and criticality. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Edward Fredkin,et al.  Digital mechanics , 1991 .

[3]  H. Crichton-Miller.  Adaptation , 1926 .

[4]  Dave Cliff,et al.  On simulating the evolution of communication , 1996 .

[5]  Walter Fontana,et al.  Beyond Digital Naturalism , 1993, Artificial Life.

[6]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  R. Lewontin.  The organism as the subject and object of evolution , 1983 .