The Moderating Effects of Group Work on the Relationship Between Motivation and Cognitive Load

Semi-formal learning is used to describe learning that is directed towards the goals of a formal learning institution but outside of the learning structure of a specific class. Students studying online may form semi-formal groups to increase their knowledge of the content by interacting with other learners taking the same class. This study of cyber university students (n = 2042) involved looking at the relationship between semi-formal learning groups and levels of germane load.  Furthermore, this study sought to understand what role group work plays in moderating the relationship between motivation and germane load. This study found that highly motivated students had higher levels of germane load, and that group work negatively moderated that relationship. In other words, while all students benefited from group work, students with lower levels of motivation benefited more than students with high levels of motivation. This research fills an important gap by showing the value this type of group work can have for all learners, particularly those who may otherwise struggle.

[1]  Robyn M. Gillies,et al.  Co-operative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups , 2003 .

[2]  Spencer Kagan,et al.  The Structural Approach to Cooperative Learning. , 1990 .

[3]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation , 2006 .

[4]  W. Joolingen,et al.  Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: relations between students’ achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement , 2008 .

[5]  W. Carss.  The Effects of using Think-Pair-Share during Guided Reading Lessons , 2007 .

[6]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[7]  Krista E. DeLeeuw,et al.  A Comparison of Three Measures of Cognitive Load: Evidence for Separable Measures of Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Load , 2008 .

[8]  Jennifer A. Lyke,et al.  Cognition in Context: Students’ Perceptions of Classroom Goal Structures and Reported Cognitive Strategy Use in the College Classroom , 2006 .

[9]  D. Stipek.  Motivation and instruction. , 1996 .

[10]  Joel Cooper,et al.  A Persuasive Example of Collaborative Learning , 2002 .

[11]  Christopher Lange,et al.  The Effects of Lecture Diversity on Germane Load , 2017 .

[12]  D. Schugurensky,et al.  The forms of informal learning: towards a conceptualization of the field , 2000 .

[13]  Mina Tsay,et al.  A Case Study of Cooperative Learning and Communication Pedagogy: Does Working in Teams Make a Difference? , 2010 .

[14]  N. Kerr,et al.  Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. , 1996 .

[15]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[16]  Linda Blake,et al.  The effects of video on cognitive load and social presence in multimedia-learning , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  T. Gog,et al.  Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load , 2014 .

[18]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[19]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  The Role of Goal Orientation and Self-Efficacy in Learning from Web-Based Worked Examples , 2009 .

[20]  Slava Kalyuga.  Cognitive Load Theory: How Many Types of Load Does It Really Need? , 2011 .

[21]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Measuring cognitive load in introductory CS: adaptation of an instrument , 2014, ICER '14.

[22]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative Learning: Improving University Instruction by Basing Practice on Validated Theory. , 2014 .

[23]  P. Pintrich.  A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[24]  Theo J. Bastiaens,et al.  The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[25]  Gill Clough,et al.  Mobile learning: Two case studies of supporting inquiry learning in informal and semiformal settings , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment , 1997, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[27]  Russell Butson,et al.  Challenges of Effective Collaboration in a Virtual Learning Environment among Undergraduate Students , 2014 .

[28]  James C. Lester,et al.  The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .

[29]  Hanna Järvenoja,et al.  Research on Motivation in Collaborative Learning: Moving Beyond the Cognitive–Situative Divide and Combining Individual and Social Processes , 2010 .

[30]  Stephanie C Payne,et al.  A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  Christopher Lange,et al.  Informal cooperative learning in small groups: The effect of scaffolding on participation , 2016 .

[32]  Chang Zhu,et al.  Student Satisfaction, Performance, and Knowledge Construction in Online Collaborative Learning , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[33]  Dc Washington,et al.  Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: (NCES -044). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education for Education Statistics. , 2009 .

[34]  D. Garrison,et al.  The Development of a Community of Inquiry over Time in an Online Course: Understanding the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive and Teaching Presence. , 2008 .

[35]  Kathleen M. T. Collins,et al.  Performance of cooperative learning groups in a postgraduate education research methodology course , 2009 .

[36]  R. Scott Tindale,et al.  Shared Information, Cognitive Load, and Group Memory , 2002 .

[37]  C. Wolters.  Advancing Achievement Goal Theory: Using Goal Structures and Goal Orientations to Predict Students' Motivation, Cognition, and Achievement. , 2004 .

[38]  Kim Jesper Herrmann,et al.  The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention , 2013 .

[39]  Maria Puzziferro.  Online Technologies Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated Learning as Predictors of Final Grade and Satisfaction in College-Level Online Courses , 2008 .

[40]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Kadir Kozan,et al.  The predictive power of the presences on cognitive load , 2015 .

[42]  Marold Wosnitza.  Contemporary Motivation Research: From Global to Local Perspectives , 2009 .

[43]  T. Jong.  Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought , 2010 .

[44]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies , 2010, Medical education.

[45]  Nicolas Debue,et al.  What does germane load mean? An empirical contribution to the cognitive load theory , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[46]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  The Role of Mobile Devices in Facilitating Collaborative Inquiry in situ , 2008, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[47]  B. P. Granger,et al.  Enhancing Training Outcomes in the Context of e-Learning: The Impact of Objective Learner Control, Training Content Complexity, Cognitive Load, Learning Goal Orientation, and Metacognitive Strategies , 2012 .

[48]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[49]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving , 2001 .

[50]  T. Gog,et al.  Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[51]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .

[52]  J. Meece,et al.  Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities , 1988 .

[53]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Management of information in small groups. , 1996 .

[54]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[55]  Li Yuan,et al.  MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education , 2013 .

[56]  Christopher Lange,et al.  The Relationship between Social Presence and Critical Thinking: Results from Learner Discourse in an Asynchronous Learning Environment. , 2016 .

[57]  F. Paas,et al.  A Cognitive Load Approach to Collaborative Learning: United Brains for Complex Tasks , 2009 .

[58]  Ho Seub Lee,et al.  Analysis of Various Influences and Factors on Academic Persistence of Cyber University Students , 2015 .

[59]  Özgen Korkmaz,et al.  A validity and reliability study of the Online Cooperative Learning Attitude Scale (OCLAS) , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[60]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  The role of academic motivation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[61]  Christopher Lange,et al.  The Effects of Instructor Control of Online Learning Environments on Satisfaction and Perceived Learning. , 2016 .

[62]  Norman Vaughan,et al.  Moving to Their Own Beat: Exploring How Students Use Web 2.0 Technologies to Support Group Work outside of Class Time. , 2011 .

[63]  T. Waits.  Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2000-2001. E.D. Tabs. , 2003 .

[64]  J. Nichols,et al.  Cooperative Learning and Student Motivation. , 1994 .

[65]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[66]  L. G. Pee,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in Information Systems Development: A Social Interdependence Perspective , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[67]  K. G. Collier.  Peer-Group Learning in Higher Education: The Development of Higher Order Skills. , 1980 .