Patterned iconicity in sign language lexicons

Iconicity is an acknowledged property of both gesture and sign language. In contrast to the familiar definition of iconicity as a correspondence between individual forms and their referents, we explore iconicity as a shared property among groups of signs, in what we call patterned iconicity. In this paper, we focus on iconic strategies used by hearing silent gesturers and by signers of three unrelated sign languages in an elicitation task featuring pictures of hand-held manufactured tools. As in previous gesture literature, we find that silent gesturers largely prefer a handling strategy, though some use an instrument strategy, in which the handshape represents the shape of the tool. There are additional differences in use of handling and instrument strategies for hand-held tools across the different sign languages, suggesting typological differences in iconic patterning. Iconic patterning in each of the three sign languages demonstrates how gestural iconic resources are organized in the grammars of sign languages.

[1]  Carol Padden,et al.  Tools for Language: Patterned Iconicity in Sign Language Nouns and Verbs , 2015, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Irit Meir,et al.  Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms , 2010 .

[3]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners , 2011, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.

[4]  Cecil H. Brown Lexical Acculturation and Ethnobiology: Utilitarianism versus Intellectualism , 1995 .

[5]  Brenda Schick,et al.  The Effects of Morphological Complexity on Phonological Simplification in ASL , 2013 .

[6]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Iconicity as a General Property of Language: Evidence from Spoken and Signed Languages , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[7]  Irit Meir,et al.  Competing iconicities in the structure of languages , 2013, Cognitive linguistics.

[8]  Ulrike Zeshan,et al.  Interrogative Constructions in Signed Languages: Crosslinguistic Perspectives , 2004 .

[9]  E. Kaplan,et al.  DISTURBANCE OF GESTURE AND PANTOMIME IN APHASIA. , 1963, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  B. Woll,et al.  Frequency distribution and spreading behavior of different types of mouth actions in three sign languages , 2008 .

[11]  Irit Meir,et al.  Body as subject1 , 2007, Journal of Linguistics.

[12]  Irit Meir,et al.  Sign Languages: The grammar of space in two new sign languages , 2010 .

[13]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  How handshape type can distinguish between nouns and verbs in homesign. , 2013, Gesture.

[14]  Denis Burnham,et al.  Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners' gestures without speech. , 2005, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[15]  Richard Bank,et al.  Variation in mouth actions with manual signs in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT) , 2011 .

[16]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  The noun-verb distinction in two young sign languages , 2013 .