Value Co-creation Ontology—A Service-dominant Logic Perspective

Marketing research apprises scholars in different disciplines of a paradigmatic reorientation from a traditional goods-dominant (G-D) to a service-dominant (S-D) logic. S-D logic re-conceptualizes the notion of economic exchange. The cornerstone of this reorientation is the concept of value co-creation—a collaborative process of reciprocal value creation among various actors. Owing to S-D logic’s significance, information systems (IS) research discusses its prospective implications on core elements of the IS knowledge base. However, an equivocal understanding of value co-creation’s foundations, semantics, and use emphasizes its underlying theoretical ambiguity in IS and marketing research. Through employing Methontology, a well-structured methodology to build ontologies, we develop a value co-creation ontology for IS from an S-D logic perspective. The developed ontology not only offers a multidisciplinary glossary of value co-creation’s constituent concepts, but also thoroughly depicts their relationships. The resultant ontology represents a first step toward reflecting S-D logic in IS analysis and design.

[1]  D. Dalli,et al.  Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review , 2014 .

[2]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective , 2008 .

[3]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Author ' s personal copy It ' s all B 2 B ... and beyond : Toward a systems perspective of the market , 2011 .

[4]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  Learning The Differences Between Ontologies and Conceptual Schemas Through Ontology-Driven Information Systems , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  Information Technology and Product/Service Innovation: A Brief Assessment and Some Suggestions for Future Research , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key Contributions and Future Directions , 2015, MIS Q..

[7]  C. Grönroos,et al.  Service as business logic: implications for value creation and marketing , 2011 .

[8]  Emma K. Macdonald,et al.  How Business Customers Judge Solutions: Solution Quality and Value in Use , 2016 .

[9]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Ontology-Based Evaluation of Natural Disaster Management Websites: A Multistakeholder Perspective , 2014, MIS Q..

[10]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[11]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  Ontology of collaborative manufacturing: Alignment of service-oriented framework with service-dominant logic , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Robert Johnston,et al.  The service concept: the missing link in service design research? , 2002 .

[13]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Fundamentals of service science , 2008 .

[14]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: a service‐dominant logic perspective , 2009 .

[15]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[16]  A. Payne,et al.  Managing the co-creation of value , 2008 .

[17]  Shirish C. Srivastava,et al.  Bridging the Service Divide Through Digitally Enabled Service Innovations: Evidence from Indian Healthcare Service Providers , 2015, MIS Q..

[18]  E. Gummesson Extending the service-dominant logic: from customer centricity to balanced centricity , 2008 .

[19]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: reactions, reflections and refinements , 2006 .

[20]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  The service system is the basic abstraction of service science , 2009, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[21]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective , 2015, MIS Q..

[22]  C. Grönroos Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis , 2011 .

[23]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic , 2016 .

[24]  C. Grönroos Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co‐creates? , 2008 .

[25]  A. Neely Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing , 2008 .

[26]  Rajiv Kishore,et al.  Computational Ontologies and Information Systems II: Formal Specification , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: Contributions from service-dominant logic , 2008, IBM Syst. J..

[28]  Varun Grover,et al.  Cocreating IT Value: New Capabilities and Metrics for Multifirm Environments , 2012, MIS Q..

[29]  R. G. Fichman,et al.  Digital Innovation as a Fundamental and Powerful Concept in the Information Systems Curriculum , 2014, MIS Q..

[30]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Technology as an operant resource in service (eco)systems , 2014, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[31]  P. Pasini,et al.  Service co-production and value co-creation: The case for a service-oriented architecture (SOA) , 2008 .

[32]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Health Care Customer Value Cocreation Practice Styles , 2012 .

[33]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Co‐creating unique value with customers , 2004 .

[34]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  On looking into Vargo and Lusch's concept of generic actors in markets, or “It's all B2B …and beyond!” , 2011 .

[35]  John O'Shaughnessy,et al.  The service‐dominant perspective: a backward step? , 2009 .

[36]  Kumar Rakesh Ranjan,et al.  Value co-creation: concept and measurement , 2014, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[37]  Steven L. Alter,et al.  Challenges for Service Science , 2012 .

[38]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal Ontology and Information Systems , 1998 .

[39]  Rajiv Kishore,et al.  Computational Ontologies and Information Systems I: Foundations , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System , 2015, MIS Q..

[41]  Phil Godsiff,et al.  Service Systems and Requisite Variety , 2010 .