Conditional lexicographic orders in constraint satisfaction problems

The lexicographically-ordered CSP (“lexicographic CSP” or “LO-CSP” for short) combines a simple representation of preferences with the feasibility constraints of ordinary CSPs. Preferences are defined by a total ordering across all assignments, such that a change in assignment to a given variable is more important than any change in assignment to any less important variable. In this paper, we show how this representation can be extended to handle conditional preferences in two ways. In the first, for each conditional preference relation, the parents have higher priority than the children in the original lexicographic ordering. In the second, the relation between parents and children need not correspond to the importance ordering of variables. In this case, by obviating the “overwhelming advantage” effect with respect to the original variables and values, the representational capacity is significantly enhanced. For problems of the first type, any of the algorithms originally devised for ordinary LO-CSPs can also be used when some of the domain orderings are dependent on assignments to “parent” variables. For problems of the second type, algorithms based on lexical orders can be used if the representation is augmented by variables and constraints that link preference orders to assignments. In addition, the branch-and-bound algorithm originally devised for ordinary LO-CSPs can be extended to handle CSPs with conditional domain orderings.

[1]  Jon Doyle,et al.  Preferential Semantics for Goals , 1991, AAAI.

[2]  Ronen I. Brafman,et al.  Preference‐Based Constrained Optimization with CP‐Nets , 2004, Comput. Intell..

[3]  Nic Wilson,et al.  Lexicographically-ordered constraint satisfaction problems , 2009, Constraints.

[4]  Ronen I. Brafman,et al.  Reasoning With Conditional Ceteris Paribus Preference Statements , 1999, UAI.

[5]  Eugene C. Freuder,et al.  Ordinal Constraint Satisfaction , 1992 .

[6]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  LEXICOGRAPHIC ORDERS, UTILITIES AND DECISION RULES: A SURVEY , 1974 .

[7]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[8]  Ronen I. Brafman,et al.  CP-nets: Reasoning and Consistency Testing , 2002, KR.

[9]  Nic Wilson,et al.  Consistency and Constrained Optimisation for Conditional Preferences , 2004, ECAI.

[10]  Ronen I. Brafman,et al.  On Graphical Modeling of Preference and Importance , 2011, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[11]  Ulrich Junker,et al.  Preference-Based Search and Multi-Criteria Optimization , 2002, Ann. Oper. Res..

[12]  Thomas Schiex,et al.  Valued Constraint Satisfaction Problems: Hard and Easy Problems , 1995, IJCAI.

[13]  Miroslaw Truszczynski,et al.  The computational complexity of dominance and consistency in CP-nets , 2005, IJCAI.

[14]  Richard J. Wallace,et al.  Interpretation of Preferences Based on Extended Conditional Lexicographic Orders � , 2022 .

[15]  Ronen I. Brafman,et al.  CP-nets: A Tool for Representing and Reasoning withConditional Ceteris Paribus Preference Statements , 2011, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[16]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[17]  Ronen I. Brafman,et al.  Introducing Variable Importance Tradeoffs into CP-Nets , 2002, UAI.

[18]  Nic Wilson,et al.  Conditional lexicographic orders in constraint satisfaction problems , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[19]  Nic Wilson,et al.  Extending CP-Nets with Stronger Conditional Preference Statements , 2004, AAAI.

[20]  Nic Wilson,et al.  An Efficient Upper Approximation for Conditional Preference , 2006, ECAI.