The use of variable-number tandem-repeat mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit typing to identify laboratory cross-contamination with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Butcher,et al. Estimation of the Rate of Unrecognized Cross-Contamination with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in London Microbiology Laboratories , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[2] S. Gillespie,et al. Molecular methods for Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain typing: a users guide. , 2003, Journal of applied microbiology.
[3] P. Hawkey,et al. Rapid Identification of Laboratory Contamination withMycobacterium tuberculosis Using Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[4] J. Bauer,et al. False-positive results from cultures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis due to laboratory cross-contamination confirmed by restriction fragment length polymorphism , 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology.
[5] R. Frothingham,et al. Genetic diversity in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex based on variable numbers of tandem DNA repeats. , 1998, Microbiology.
[6] C. Braden,et al. A Prospective, Multicenter Study of Laboratory Cross-Contamination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Cultures , 2002, Emerging infectious diseases.
[7] Ellen Jo Baron,et al. Manual of clinical microbiology , 1975 .
[8] G. Schoolnik,et al. Molecular strain typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to confirm cross-contamination in the mycobacteriology laboratory and modification of procedures to minimize occurrence of false-positive cultures , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.
[9] Albert Balows,et al. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 7th ed. , 2000 .
[10] R. G. Hewinson,et al. Discrimination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex bacteria using novel VNTR-PCR targets. , 2002, Microbiology.
[11] R. Reves,et al. Review of false-positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and recommendations for avoiding unnecessary treatment. , 2000, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
[12] W. Stead,et al. Retrospective detection of laboratory cross-contamination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures with use of DNA fingerprint analysis. , 1997, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
[13] R. Frothingham,et al. Comparison of Methods Based on Different Molecular Epidemiological Markers for Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Strains: Interlaboratory Study of Discriminatory Power and Reproducibility , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[14] J. T. Crawford,et al. Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates with Low Copy Numbers of IS6110 by Using Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Units , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[15] S. Gillespie,et al. Comparison of Variable Number Tandem Repeat and IS6110-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analyses for Discrimination of High- and Low-Copy-Number IS6110 Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[16] J. Musser,et al. Extensive Cross-Contamination of Specimens withMycobacterium tuberculosis in a Reference Laboratory , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[17] C. Locht,et al. High-resolution minisatellite-based typing as a portable approach to global analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis molecular epidemiology. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[18] E. Nardell,et al. Estimated Costs of False Laboratory Diagnoses of Tuberculosis in Three Patients , 2002, Emerging infectious diseases.
[19] M. Wilson,et al. The effect of changes in laboratory practices on the rate of false-positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 2001, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[20] R. Reves,et al. The incidence of false-positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.
[21] Philip Supply,et al. Automated High-Throughput Genotyping for Study of Global Epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Based on Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Units , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[22] D. van Soolingen,et al. Investigation of cross contamination in a Mycobacterium tuberculosis laboratory using IS6110 DNA fingerprinting. , 1998, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.
[23] P. Hawkey,et al. Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Compared to IS6110-Based Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis for Investigation of Apparently Clustered Cases of Tuberculosis , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[24] Philip Supply,et al. Variable human minisatellite‐like regions in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome , 2000, Molecular microbiology.
[25] D. van Soolingen,et al. False-Positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis Cultures in 44 Laboratories in The Netherlands (1993 to 2000): Incidence, Risk Factors, and Consequences , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[26] Y. Jin,et al. Comparison of the MB/BacT and BACTEC MGIT 960 system for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. , 2000, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.